The XOR channels on Marvell SoCs have a Window Override Control
register that allow to do some fancy things with addresses. Those
features are not used by the driver, but some U-Boot versions anyway
modify those registers.
For some reason, the U-Boot on OpenBlocks AX3-4 was setting an invalid
value in those registers when the addition 2 GB DRAM chip was plugged
into the board, causing the XOR driver to fail in using the XOR
engines.
By setting those registers to 0 during the driver initialization, we
ensure that the registers are configured according with the driver
operation model.
Thanks to Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com> for his help in debugging
this problem.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Even though the driver cannot be unloaded at the moment, it is still
good to properly free the IRQ handlers in the channel removal function.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
The pool_size is always PAGE_SIZE, and since it is a software
configuration paramter (and not a hardware description parameter), we
cannot make it part of the Device Tree binding, so we'd better remove
it from the platform_data as well.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Now that mv_xor_device is no longer used to designate the per-channel
DMA devices, use it know to designate the XOR engine themselves
(currently composed of two XOR channels).
So, now we have the nice organization where:
- mv_xor_device represents each XOR engine in the system
- mv_xor_chan represents each XOR channel of a given XOR engine
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Even though the DMA engine infrastructure has support for multiple
channels per device, the mv_xor driver registers one DMA engine device
for each channel, because the mv_xor channels inside the same XOR
engine have different capabilities, and the DMA engine infrastructure
only allows to express capabilities at the DMA engine device level.
The mv_xor driver has therefore been registering one DMA engine device
and one DMA engine channel for each XOR channel since its introduction
in the kernel. However, it kept two separate internal structures,
mv_xor_device and mv_xor_channel, which didn't make a lot of sense
since there was a 1:1 mapping between those structures.
This patch gets rid of this duplication, and merges everything into
the mv_xor_chan structure.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
The mv_xor_device structure embeds a 'struct dma_device', which is
named 'common', a not very meaningful name. Rename it to 'dmadev',
which will help avoid confusions later as we merge the mv_xor_device
and mv_xor_chan structures together.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
The mv_xor_chan structure embeds a 'struct dma_chan', which is named
'common', a not very meaningful name. Rename it to 'dmachan', which
will help avoid confusions later as we merge the mv_xor_device and
mv_xor_chan structures together.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
It was only used in places where we could get the 'struct device *'
pointer through a different way.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
The 'shared' word no longer makes sense in a number of places as we
renamed the 'mv_xor_shared' driver to 'mv_xor'.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Extend the XOR engine driver (currently called "mv_xor_shared") so
that XOR channels can be passed in the platform_data structure, and be
registered from there.
This will allow the users of the driver to be converted to the single
platform_driver variant of the mv_xor driver.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
The driver currently pokes into the platform_data structure during its
normal operation to get the pool_size value. Poking into the
platform_data structure is not nice when moving to the Device Tree, so
this commit adds a new pool_size field in the mv_xor_device structure,
which gets initialized at ->probe() time. The driver then uses this
field instead of the platform_data.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Some orion platforms can gate the XOR driver clock. If the clock
exisits, unable/disable it as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Tested-by: Jamie Lentin <jm@lentin.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Every DMA engine implementation declares a last completed dma cookie
in their private dma channel structures. This is pointless, and
forces driver specific code. Move this out into the common dma_chan
structure.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
[imx-sdma.c & mxs-dma.c]
Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@linux.intel.com>
mv_xor's is_complete_cookie is only ever written to, but never read.
This is silly, remove the write-only structure member.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
[imx-sdma.c & mxs-dma.c]
Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@linux.intel.com>
Drop mv_xor's use of tx_list from struct dma_async_tx_descriptor in
preparation for removal of this field.
Cc: Saeed Bishara <saeed@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
The XOR engine found in Marvell's SoCs and system controllers
provides XOR and DMA operation, iSCSI CRC32C calculation, memory
initialization, and memory ECC error cleanup operation support.
This driver implements the DMA engine API and supports the following
capabilities:
- memcpy
- xor
- memset
The XOR engine can be used by DMA engine clients implemented in the
kernel, one of those clients is the RAID module. In that case, I
observed 20% improvement in the raid5 write throughput, and 40%
decrease in the CPU utilization when doing array construction, those
results obtained on an 5182 running at 500Mhz.
When enabling the NET DMA client, the performance decreased, so
meanwhile it is recommended to keep this client off.
Signed-off-by: Saeed Bishara <saeed@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@marvell.com>
Acked-by: Maciej Sosnowski <maciej.sosnowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Thomas Petazzoni