Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Vitaly Bordug 1461b4ea2b [PATCH] ppc32: ppc_sys fixes for 8xx and 82xx
This patch fixes a numbers of issues regarding to that both 8xx and 82xx
began to use ppc_sys model:
	- Platform is now identified by default deviceless SOC, if no
BOARD_CHIP_NAME is specified in the bard-specific header. For the list
of supported names refer to (arch/ppc/syslib/) mpc8xx_sys.c and
mpc82xx_sys.c for 8xx and 82xx respectively.
	- Fixed a bug in identification by name - if the name was not found,
it returned -1 instead of default deviceless ppc_spec.
	- fixed devices amount in the 8xx platform system descriptions

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@ru.mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
2005-10-29 14:49:29 +10:00
Kumar Gala d054b5acfe [PATCH] ppc32: Add proper prototype for cpm2_reset()
Added a proper prototype for cpm2_reset() which gets rid of a build
warning.

Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-27 16:25:55 -07:00
Vitaly Bordug a6dbba77a9 [PATCH] ppc32: Support for 82xx PQII on-chip PCI bridge
This patch adds on-chip PCI bridge support for the PQ2 family.  The
incomplete existent code is updated with interrupt handling stuff and
board-specific bits for 8272ADS and PQ2FADS; the related files were renamed
(from m8260_pci to m82xx_pci) to be of more generic fashion.  This is
tested with 8266ADS and 8272ADS, should work on PQ2FADS as well.

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@ru.mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-05-28 16:46:15 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00