The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-51-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-49-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-38-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-48-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-47-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-46-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-45-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-44-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
Cc: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Acked-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-43-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-42-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-41-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-40-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-39-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-37-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-36-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-35-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-33-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-32-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-30-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-29-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-28-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-27-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-26-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-24-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-23-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-22-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-21-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-20-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-19-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-18-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-17-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-16-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-15-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-14-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
While at it, remove forward-declaration of atmel_console - it wasn't
needed even at the moment the driver was first time introduced:
commit 1e6c9c2878 ("[ARM] 3242/2: AT91RM9200 support for 2.6 (Serial)")
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>
Cc: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-13-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-12-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-11-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-10-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-9-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-8-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-7-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
In contrast to 8250/8250_of, legacy_serial on powerpc does fill
(struct plat_serial8250_port). The reason is likely that it's done on
device_initcall(), not on probe. So, 8250_core is not yet probed.
Propagate value from platform_device on 8250 probe - in case powepc
legacy driver it's initialized on initcall, in case 8250_of it will be
initialized later on of_platform_serial_setup().
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-6-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This reverts commit 54edb42534.
The offending commit caused serdev core to always be built-in, something
which breaks the build of dependent modules when serdev is being built
as a module:
ERROR: "__serdev_device_driver_register" [drivers/gnss/gnss-ubx.ko] undefined!
...
make[2]: *** [/home/johan/work/omicron/src/linux/scripts/Makefile.modpost:94: __modpost] Error 1
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191218131154.13702-1-johan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This reverts commit 751d001733.
The wrong commit got added to the tty-next tree, the correct one is in
the tty-linus branch.
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Engraf <david.engraf@sysgo.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The SUPPORT_SYSRQ ifdeffery is not nice as:
- May create misunderstanding about sizeof(struct uart_port) between
different objects
- Prevents moving functions from serial_core.h
- Reduces readability (well, it's ifdeffery - it's hard to follow)
In order to remove SUPPORT_SYSRQ, has_sysrq variable has been added.
Initialise it in driver's probe and remove ifdeffery.
Cc: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Acked-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-5-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The samsung_tty driver was trying to abuse the struct uart_port by using
two "empty" bytes for its own use. That's not ok, and was found by
removing those fields from the structure.
Move the variables into the port-specific structure, which is where
everything else for this port already is. There is no space wasted here
as there was an empty "hole" in the structure already for these bytes.
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
Cc: Hyunki Koo <kkoos00@naver.com>
Cc: HYUN-KI KOO <hyunki00.koo@samsung.com>
Cc: Shinbeom Choi <sbeom.choi@samsung.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191217140232.GA3489190@kroah.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
sysrq_toggle_support() can be called in parallel, in return calling
input_(un)register_handler(), which fortunately is safe to call
in parallel and regardless of registered/unregistered status of
sysrq_handler.
Remove sysrq_handler_registered as it doesn't have any function there
and may confuse reader about possible race.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213000657.931618-2-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Dmitry Safonov