Michael Olbrich reported that his test program fails when built with
-O2 -mcpu=cortex-a8 -mfpu=neon, and a kernel which supports v6 and v7
CPUs:
volatile int x = 2;
volatile int64_t y = 2;
int main() {
volatile int a = 0;
volatile int64_t b = 0;
while (1) {
a = (a + x) % (1 << 30);
b = (b + y) % (1 << 30);
assert(a == b);
}
}
and two instances are run. When built for just v7 CPUs, this program
works fine. It uses the "vadd.i64 d19, d18, d16" VFP instruction.
It appears that we do not save the high-16 double VFP registers across
context switches when the kernel is built for v6 CPUs. Fix that.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Tested-By: Michael Olbrich <m.olbrich@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Convert #include "..." to #include <path/...> in kernel system headers.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
MVFR0 and MVFR1 are only available starting with ARM1136 r1p0 release
according to "B.5 VFP changes" in DDI0211F_arm1136_r1p0_trm.pdf. This is
also when TLS register got added, so we can use HAS_TLS also to test for
MVFR0 and MVFR1.
Otherwise VFPFMRX and VFPFMXR access fails and we get:
Internal error: Oops - undefined instruction: 0 [#1]
PC is at no_old_VFP_process+0x8/0x3c
LR is at __und_svc+0x48/0x80
...
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Move platform independent header files to arch/arm/include/asm, leaving
those in asm/arch* and asm/plat* alone.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Russell King