On a CB_RECALL the callback service thread flushes the inode using
filemap_flush prior to scheduling the state manager thread to return the
delegation. When pNFS is used and I/O has not yet gone to the data server
servicing the inode, a LAYOUTGET can preceed the I/O. Unlike the async
filemap_flush call, the LAYOUTGET must proceed to completion.
If the state manager starts to recover data while the inode flush is sending
the LAYOUTGET, a deadlock occurs as the callback service thread holds the
single callback session slot until the flushing is done which blocks the state
manager thread, and the state manager thread has set the session draining bit
which puts the inode flush LAYOUTGET RPC to sleep on the forechannel slot
table waitq.
Separate the draining of the back channel from the draining of the fore channel
by moving the NFS4_SESSION_DRAINING bit from session scope into the fore
and back slot tables. Drain the back channel first allowing the LAYOUTGET
call to proceed (and fail) so the callback service thread frees the callback
slot. Then proceed with draining the forechannel.
Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
If an RPC call is interrupted, assume that the server hasn't processed
the RPC call so that the next time we use the slot, we know that if we
get a NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED or NFS4ERR_SEQ_FALSE_RETRY, we just have
to bump the sequence number.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Shave a few bytes off the slot table size by moving the RPC timestamp
into the sequence results.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
If the server sends us a target that looks like an outlier, but
is lower than the existing target, then respect it anyway.
However defer actually updating the generation counter until
we get a target that doesn't look like an outlier.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Look for sudden changes in the first and second derivatives in order
to eliminate outlier changes to target_highest_slotid (which are
due to out-of-order RPC replies).
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Currently, we see a lot of bouncing for the value of highest_used_slotid
due to the fact that slots are getting freed, instead of getting instantly
transmitted to the next waiting task.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Andy Adamson