So far subsys_initcalls has been executed in this order depending on
the object order in the Makefile:
arch/x86/pci/visws.c:subsys_initcall(pcibios_init);
arch/x86/pci/numa.c:subsys_initcall(pci_numa_init);
arch/x86/pci/acpi.c:subsys_initcall(pci_acpi_init);
arch/x86/pci/legacy.c:subsys_initcall(pci_legacy_init);
arch/x86/pci/irq.c:subsys_initcall(pcibios_irq_init);
arch/x86/pci/common.c:subsys_initcall(pcibios_init);
This patch removes the ordering dependency. There is now only one
subsys_initcall function that contains subsystem initialization code
with a defined order.
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Currently, on an amd k8 system with multi ht chains, the numa_node of
pci devices under /sys/devices/pci0000:80/* is always 0, even if that
chain is on node 1 or 2 or 3.
Workaround: pcibus_to_node(bus) is used when we want to get the node that
pci_device is on.
In struct device, we already have numa_node member, and we could use
dev_to_node()/set_dev_node() to get and set numa_node in the device.
set_dev_node is called in pci_device_add() with pcibus_to_node(bus),
and pcibus_to_node uses bus->sysdata for nodeid.
The problem is when pci_add_device is called, bus->sysdata is not assigned
correct nodeid yet. The result is that numa_node will always be 0.
pcibios_scan_root and pci_scan_root could take sysdata. So we need to get
mp_bus_to_node mapping before these two are called, and thus
get_mp_bus_to_node could get correct node for sysdata in root bus.
In scanning of the root bus, all child busses will take parent bus sysdata.
So all pci_device->dev.numa_node will be assigned correctly and automatically.
Later we could use dev_to_node(&pci_dev->dev) to get numa_node, and we
could also could make other bus specific device get the correct numa_node
too.
This is an updated version of pci_sysdata and Jeff's pci_domain patch.
[ mingo@elte.hu: build fix ]
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@sun.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
We want to allow different implementations of pci_raw_ops for standard
and extended config space on x86. Rather than clutter generic code with
knowledge of this, we make pci_raw_ops private to x86 and use it to
implement the new raw interface -- raw_pci_read() and raw_pci_write().
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Robert Richter