Balance a hid_device_io_start() call with hid_device_io_stop() in the
error path. This avoids processing of HID reports when the probe fails
which possibly leads to invalid memory access in hid_device_probe() as
report_enum->report_id_hash might already be freed via
hid_close_report().
hid_set_drvdata() is called before wtp_allocate, be consistent and clear
drvdata too on the error path of wtp_allocate.
Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
The HID response has a limited size. Do not trust the value returned by
hardware, check that it really fits in the message.
Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
hidpp_devicenametype_get_device_name() may return a negative value on
protocol errors (for example, when the device is powered off).
Explicitly check this condition to avoid a long-running loop.
(0 cannot be returned as __name_length - index > 0, but check for it
anyway as it would otherwise result in an infinite loop.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
We do not make any use of the actual name length get through
hidpp_get_device_name(). Original patch by Benjamin Tissoires, this
patch also replaces a (now) unnecessary goto by return NULL.
Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
- remove the constant '1'
- when the device is not connected, the protocol error
HIDPP_ERROR_RESOURCE_ERROR is raised. We should not warn the user about
it because it is somewhat expected as an answer when we check if the
device is connected.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Reported by Dan Carpenter:
drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c:359 hidpp_root_get_protocol_version() warn: should this return really be negated?
drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c:398 hidpp_devicenametype_get_count() warn: should this return really be negated?
drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c:417 hidpp_devicenametype_get_device_name() warn: should this return really be negated?
drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c:524 hidpp_touchpad_get_raw_info() warn: should this return really be negated?
The problem lies in hidpp_send_message_sync() which can return 2 types of
errors depending of their sign. Adding a comment there to clarify what is
happening.
To solve that, print an error in case of a protocol problem, and raise
-EPROTO instead.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Shift the allocation down a few lines to avoid a memory leak and also
add a check for allocation failure.
Fixes: 2f31c52529 ('HID: Introduce hidpp, a module to handle Logitech hid++ devices')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
The TK820 presents both a keyboard and a touchpad on the same
physical (and logical device). Use the generic hid-input
processing for the keyboard part. The keyboard input device is created
when the receiver is plugged in, so no events are missed on connect.
When the device actaully connects, we can set it to use the raw
multitouch reporting to have a consistent user experience accross
all Logitech touchpads.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Andrew de los Reyes <adlr@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
This touchpad differs from the T650 in several ways:
- the resolution is not correctly returned by the device
- it presents physical buttons, so the button flag in the raw touch report
is not filled.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Andrew de los Reyes <adlr@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
All the bits are now in place to add the support of the
Touchpad T650.
The creation/population of the input device is delayed until
the device is ready.
The T650 uses the special HID++ reporting protocol, so activate
this on connect.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Andrew de los Reyes <adlr@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Now that the receiver forwards the connect/disconnect events, we can
know when the device is available to communicate with us.
When it is ready, we can for instance retrieve its full name, which
guarantee that we always have the same name for the DJ device (the DJ
name is somewhat shorter than the HID++ name).
This mechanism is mandatory for the touchpads line, which has the
min/max information stored in the device. This information can only
be retrieved when the device is connected. So we can not populate
the input device until we are sure that the device is connected.
This patch creates a new input device for such devices. However,
this input is not bound to hid directly, so the various drivers
which wants to use it are required to process completely the
incoming reports in .raw_event().
Note that the patch in itself just adds the bits for the next
ones, and this feature is disabled by default.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Andrew de los Reyes <adlr@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
The names of the DJ devices are stored in the receiver. These names
can be retrieved through a HID++ command. However, the protocol says
that you have to ask the receiver for that, not the device iteself.
Introduce a special case in the DJ handling where a device can request
its unifying name, and when such a name is given, forward it also to
the corresponding device.
On the HID++ side, the receiver talks only HID++ 1.0, so we need to
implement this part of the protocol in the module.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Andrew de los Reyes <adlr@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Devices connected through the Logitech Wireless Receiver are HID++ devices.
We can handle them here to benefit from this new module and activate
enhaced support of the various wireless touchpad or mice with touch
sensors on them.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Andrew de los Reyes <adlr@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Logitech devices use a vendor protocol to communicate various
information with the device. This protocol is called HID++,
and an exerpt can be found here:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BxbRzx7vEV7eWmgwazJ3NUFfQ28&usp=shar
The main difficulty which is related to this protocol is that
it is a synchronous protocol using the input reports.
So when we want to get some information from the device, we need
to wait for a matching input report.
This driver introduce this capabilities to be able to support
the multitouch mode of the Logitech Wireless Touchpad T651
(the bluetooth one). The multitouch data is available directly
from the mouse input reports, and we just need to query the device
on connect about its caracteristics.
HID++ and the touchpad features has a specific reporting mode
which uses pure HID++ reports, but Logitech told us not to use
it for this specific device. During QA, they detected that
some bluetooth input reports where lost, and so the only supported
mode is the pointer mode.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Andrew de los Reyes <adlr@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Peter Wu