Fix typos and add the following to the scripts/spelling.txt:
unneded||unneeded
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1481573103-11329-15-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Since we need to change the implementation, stop exposing internals.
Provide kref_read() to read the current reference count; typically
used for debug messages.
Kills two anti-patterns:
atomic_read(&kref->refcount)
kref->refcount.counter
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
When 'dispatch_assert' is set, 'response' must be DLM_MASTER_RESP_YES,
and 'res' won't be null, so execution can't reach these two branch.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/58174C91.3040004@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@versity.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The variable `set_maybe' is redundant when the mle has been found in the
map. So it is ok to set the node_idx into mle's maybe_map directly.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/71604351584F6A4EBAE558C676F37CA4A3D490DD@H3CMLB12-EX.srv.huawei-3com.com
Signed-off-by: Guozhonghua <guozhonghua@h3c.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@versity.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
In the dlm_migrate_request_handler(), when `ret' is -EEXIST, the mle
should be freed, otherwise the memory will be leaked.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/71604351584F6A4EBAE558C676F37CA4A3D3522A@H3CMLB12-EX.srv.huawei-3com.com
Signed-off-by: Guozhonghua <guozhonghua@h3c.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@versity.com>
Cc: Eric Ren <zren@suse.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We found a dlm-blocked situation caused by continuous breakdown of
recovery masters described below. To solve this problem, we should
purge recovery lock once detecting recovery master goes down.
N3 N2 N1(reco master)
go down
pick up recovery lock and
begin recoverying for N2
go down
pick up recovery
lock failed, then
purge it:
dlm_purge_lockres
->DROPPING_REF is set
send deref to N1 failed,
recovery lock is not purged
find N1 go down, begin
recoverying for N1, but
blocked in dlm_do_recovery
as DROPPING_REF is set:
dlm_do_recovery
->dlm_pick_recovery_master
->dlmlock
->dlm_get_lock_resource
->__dlm_wait_on_lockres_flags(tmpres,
DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF);
Fixes: 8c03439681 ("ocfs2/dlm: clear DROPPING_REF flag when the master goes down")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/578453AF.8030404@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiufei Xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We found a BUG situation that lockres is migrated during deref described
below. To solve the BUG, we could purge lockres directly when other
node says I did not have a ref. Additionally, we'd better purge lockres
if master goes down, as no one will response deref done.
Node 1 Node 2(old master) Node3(new master)
dlm_purge_lockres
send deref to N2
leave domain
migrate lockres to N3
finish migration
send do assert
master to N1
receive do assert msg
form N3, but can not
find lockres because
DROPPING_REF is set,
so the owner is still
N2.
receive deref from N1
and response -EINVAL
because lockres is migrated
BUG when receive -EINVAL
in dlm_drop_lockres_ref
Fixes: 842b90b624 ("ocfs2/dlm: return in progress if master can not clear the refmap bit right now")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/57845103.3070406@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiufei Xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We found a BUG situation in which DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF is cleared
unexpected that described below. To solve the bug, we disable the
BUG_ON and purge lockres in dlm_do_local_recovery_cleanup.
Node 1 Node 2(master)
dlm_purge_lockres
dlm_deref_lockres_handler
DLM_LOCK_RES_SETREF_INPROG is set
response DLM_DEREF_RESPONSE_INPROG
receive DLM_DEREF_RESPONSE_INPROG
stop puring in dlm_purge_lockres
and wait for DLM_DEREF_RESPONSE_DONE
dispatch dlm_deref_lockres_worker
response DLM_DEREF_RESPONSE_DONE
receive DLM_DEREF_RESPONSE_DONE and
prepare to purge lockres
Node 2 goes down
find Node2 down and do local
clean up for Node2:
dlm_do_local_recovery_cleanup
-> clear DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF
when purging lockres, BUG_ON happens
because DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF is clear:
dlm_deref_lockres_done_handler
->BUG_ON(!(res->state & DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF));
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix duplicated write to `ret']
Fixes: 60d663cb52 ("ocfs2/dlm: add DEREF_DONE message")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/57845055.9080702@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiufei Xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
dlm_deref_lockres_done_handler() should return zero if the message is
successfully handled.
Fixes: 60d663cb52 ("ocfs2/dlm: add DEREF_DONE message").
Signed-off-by: xuejiufei <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
when o2hb detect a node down, it first set the dead node to recovery map
and create ocfs2rec which will replay journal for dead node. o2hb
thread then call dlm_do_local_recovery_cleanup() to delete the lock for
dead node. After the lock of dead node is gone, locks for other nodes
can be granted and may modify the meta data without replaying journal of
the dead node. The detail is described as follows.
N1 N2 N3(master)
modify the extent tree of
inode, and commit
dirty metadata to journal,
then goes down.
o2hb thread detects
N1 goes down, set
recovery map and
delete the lock of N1.
dlm_thread flush ast
for the lock of N2.
do not detect the death
of N1, so recovery map is
empty.
read inode from disk
without replaying
the journal of N1 and
modify the extent tree
of the inode that N1
had modified.
ocfs2rec recover the
journal of N1.
The modification of N2
is lost.
The modification of N1 and N2 are not serial, and it will lead to
read-only file system. We can set recovery_waiting flag to the lock
resource after delete the lock for dead node to prevent other node from
getting the lock before dlm recovery. After dlm recovery, the recovery
map on N2 is not empty, ocfs2_inode_lock_full_nested() will wait for ocfs2
recovery.
Signed-off-by: Jiufei Xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Master returns in-progress to non-master node when it can not clear the
refmap bit right now. And non-master node will not purge the lock
resource until receiving deref done message.
Signed-off-by: xuejiufei <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This series of patches is to fix the dis-order issue of setting/clearing
refmap bit described below.
Node 1 Node 2(master)
dlmlock
dlm_do_master_request
dlm_master_request_handler
-> dlm_lockres_set_refmap_bit
dlmlock succeed
dlmunlock succeed
dlm_purge_lockres
dlm_deref_handler
-> find lock resource is in
DLM_LOCK_RES_SETREF_INPROG state,
so dispatch a deref work
dlm_purge_lockres succeed.
call dlmlock again
dlm_do_master_request
dlm_master_request_handler
-> dlm_lockres_set_refmap_bit
deref work trigger, call
dlm_lockres_clear_refmap_bit
to clear Node 1 from refmap
dlm_purge_lockres succeed
dlm_send_remote_lock_request
return DLM_IVLOCKID because
the lockres is not exist
BUG if the lockres is $RECOVERY
This series of patches add a new message to keep the order of set and
clear. Other nodes can purge the lock resource only after the refmap bit
on master is cleared.
This patch is to add DEREF_DONE message and corresponding handler. Node
can purge the lock resource after receiving this message. As a new
message is added, so increase the minor number of dlm protocol version.
Signed-off-by: xuejiufei <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
When two processes are migrating the same lockres,
dlm_add_migration_mle() return -EEXIST, but insert a new mle in hash
list. dlm_migrate_lockres() will detach the old mle and free the new
one which is already in hash list, that will destroy the list.
Signed-off-by: Jiufei Xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Reviewed-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We have found that migration source will trigger a BUG that the refcount
of mle is already zero before put when the target is down during
migration. The situation is as follows:
dlm_migrate_lockres
dlm_add_migration_mle
dlm_mark_lockres_migrating
dlm_get_mle_inuse
<<<<<< Now the refcount of the mle is 2.
dlm_send_one_lockres and wait for the target to become the
new master.
<<<<<< o2hb detect the target down and clean the migration
mle. Now the refcount is 1.
dlm_migrate_lockres woken, and put the mle twice when found the target
goes down which trigger the BUG with the following message:
"ERROR: bad mle: ".
Signed-off-by: Jiufei Xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
dlm_grab() may return NULL when the node is doing unmount. When doing
code review, we found that some dlm handlers may return error to caller
when dlm_grab() returns NULL and make caller BUG or other problems.
Here is an example:
Node 1 Node 2
receives migration message
from node 3, and send
migrate request to others
start unmounting
receives migrate request
from node 1 and call
dlm_migrate_request_handler()
unmount thread unregisters
domain handlers and removes
dlm_context from dlm_domains
dlm_migrate_request_handlers()
returns -EINVAL to node 1
Exit migration neither clearing the
migration state nor sending
assert master message to node 3 which
cause node 3 hung.
Signed-off-by: Jiufei Xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@huawei.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Commit f3f854648d ("ocfs2_dlm: Ensure correct ordering of set/clear
refmap bit on lockres") still exists a race which can't ensure the
ordering is exactly correct.
Node1 Node2 Node3
umount, migrate
lockres to Node2
migrate finished,
send migrate request
to Node3
received migrate request,
create a migration_mle,
respond to Node2.
set DLM_LOCK_RES_SETREF_INPROG
and send assert master to
Node3
delete migration_mle in
assert_master_handler,
Node3 umount without response
dlm_thread purge
this lockres, send drop
deref message to Node2
found the flag of
DLM_LOCK_RES_SETREF_INPROG
is set, dispatch
dlm_deref_lockres_worker to
clear refmap, but in function of
dlm_deref_lockres_worker,
only if node in refmap it wait
DLM_LOCK_RES_SETREF_INPROG
to be cleared. So worker is
done successfully
purge lockres, send
assert master response
to Node1, and finish umount
set Node3 in refmap, and it
won't be cleared forever, thus
lead to umount hung
so wait until DLM_LOCK_RES_SETREF_INPROG is cleared in
dlm_deref_lockres_worker.
Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We have found a BUG on res->migration_pending when migrating lock
resources. The situation is as follows.
dlm_mark_lockres_migration
res->migration_pending = 1;
__dlm_lockres_reserve_ast
dlm_lockres_release_ast returns with res->migration_pending remains
because other threads reserve asts
wait dlm_migration_can_proceed returns 1
>>>>>>> o2hb found that target goes down and remove target
from domain_map
dlm_migration_can_proceed returns 1
dlm_mark_lockres_migrating returns -ESHOTDOWN with
res->migration_pending still remains.
When reentering dlm_mark_lockres_migrating(), it will trigger the BUG_ON
with res->migration_pending. So clear migration_pending when target is
down.
Signed-off-by: Jiufei Xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
dlm_lockres_put will call dlm_lockres_release if it is the last
reference, and then it may call dlm_print_one_lock_resource and
take lockres spinlock.
So unlock lockres spinlock before dlm_lockres_put to avoid deadlock.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The order of the following three spinlocks should be:
dlm_domain_lock < dlm_ctxt->spinlock < dlm_lock_resource->spinlock
But dlm_dispatch_assert_master() is called while holding
dlm_ctxt->spinlock and dlm_lock_resource->spinlock, and then it calls
dlm_grab() which will take dlm_domain_lock.
Once another thread (for example, dlm_query_join_handler) has already
taken dlm_domain_lock, and tries to take dlm_ctxt->spinlock deadlock
happens.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: "Junxiao Bi" <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The following case will lead to a lockres is freed but is still in use.
cat /sys/kernel/debug/o2dlm/locking_state dlm_thread
lockres_seq_start
-> lock dlm->track_lock
-> get resA
resA->refs decrease to 0,
call dlm_lockres_release,
and wait for "cat" unlock.
Although resA->refs is already set to 0,
increase resA->refs, and then unlock
lock dlm->track_lock
-> list_del_init()
-> unlock
-> free resA
In such a race case, invalid address access may occurs. So we should
delete list res->tracking before resA->refs decrease to 0.
Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
There is a race window in dlm_get_lock_resource(), which may return a
lock resource which has been purged. This will cause the process to
hang forever in dlmlock() as the ast msg can't be handled due to its
lock resource not existing.
dlm_get_lock_resource {
...
spin_lock(&dlm->spinlock);
tmpres = __dlm_lookup_lockres_full(dlm, lockid, namelen, hash);
if (tmpres) {
spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock);
>>>>>>>> race window, dlm_run_purge_list() may run and purge
the lock resource
spin_lock(&tmpres->spinlock);
...
spin_unlock(&tmpres->spinlock);
}
}
Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Commit ac4fef4d23 ("ocfs2/dlm: do not purge lockres that is queued for
assert master") may have the following possible race case:
dlm_dispatch_assert_master dlm_wq
========================================================================
queue_work(dlm->quedlm_worker,
&dlm->dispatched_work);
dispatch work,
dlm_lockres_drop_inflight_worker
*BUG_ON(res->inflight_assert_workers == 0)*
dlm_lockres_grab_inflight_worker
inflight_assert_workers++
So ensure inflight_assert_workers to be increased first.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Xue jiufei <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Node A sends master query request to node B which is the master. At this
time lockres happens to be on purgelist. dlm_master_request_handler gets
the dlm spinlock, finds the resource and releases the dlm spin lock.
Right at this dlm_thread on this node could purge the lockres.
dlm_master_request_handler can then acquire lockres spinlock and reply to
Node A that node B is the master even though lockres on node B is purged.
The above scenario will now make node A falsely think node B is the master
which is inconsistent. Further if another node C tries to master the same
resource, every node will respond they are not the master. Node C then
masters the resource and sends assert master to all nodes. This will now
make node A crash with the following message.
dlm_assert_master_handler:1831 ERROR: DIE! Mastery assert from 9, but current
owner is 10!
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Eeda <srinivas.eeda@oracle.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Reviewed-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Remove the branch that free res->lockname.name because the condition
is never satisfied when jump to label error.
Signed-off-by: joyce.xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
In dlm_assert_master_handler, the mle is get in dlm_find_mle, should be
put when goto kill, otherwise, this mle will never be released.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chen <alex.chen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: joyce.xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
There is a deadlock case which reported by Guozhonghua:
https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2014-September/010079.html
This case is caused by &res->spinlock and &dlm->master_lock
misordering in different threads.
It was introduced by commit 8d400b81cc ("ocfs2/dlm: Clean up refmap
helpers"). Since lockres is new, it doesn't not require the
&res->spinlock. So remove it.
Fixes: 8d400b81cc ("ocfs2/dlm: Clean up refmap helpers")
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: joyce.xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
Reported-by: Guozhonghua <guozhonghua@h3c.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Orabug: 19074140
When umount is issued during recovery on the new master that has not
finished remastering locks, it triggers BUG() in
dlm_send_mig_lockres_msg(). Here is the situation:
1) node A has a lock on resource X mastered by node B.
2) node B dies -> node A sets recovering flag for res X
3) Node C becomes the new master for resources owned by the
dead node and is remastering locks of the dead node but
has not finished the remastering process yet.
4) umount is issued on node C.
5) During processing of umount, ignoring unfished recovery,
node C attempts to migrate resource X to node A.
6) node A finds res X in DLM_LOCK_RES_RECOVERING state, considers
it a logic error and sends back -EFAULT.
7) node C asserts BUG() upon seeing EFAULT resp from node B.
Fix is to delay migrating res X till remastering is finished at which
point recovering flag will be cleared on both A and C.
Signed-off-by: Tariq Saeed <tariq.x.saeed@oracle.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
When workqueue is delayed, it may occur that a lockres is purged while it
is still queued for master assert. it may trigger BUG() as follows.
N1 N2
dlm_get_lockres()
->dlm_do_master_requery
is the master of lockres,
so queue assert_master work
dlm_thread() start running
and purge the lockres
dlm_assert_master_worker()
send assert master message
to other nodes
receiving the assert_master
message, set master to N2
dlmlock_remote() send create_lock message to N2, but receive DLM_IVLOCKID,
if it is RECOVERY lockres, it triggers the BUG().
Another BUG() is triggered when N3 become the new master and send
assert_master to N1, N1 will trigger the BUG() because owner doesn't
match. So we should not purge lockres when it is queued for assert
master.
Signed-off-by: joyce.xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The following case may lead to endless loop during umount.
node A node B node C node D
umount volume,
migrate lockres1
to B
want to lock lockres1,
send
MASTER_REQUEST_MSG
to C
init block mle
send
MIGRATE_REQUEST_MSG
to C
find a block
mle, and then
return
DLM_MIGRATE_RESPONSE_MASTERY_REF
to B
set C in refmap
umount successfully
try to umount, endless
loop occurs when migrate
lockres1 since C is in
refmap
So we can fix this endless loop case by only returning
DLM_MIGRATE_RESPONSE_MASTERY_REF if it has a mastery mle when receiving
MIGRATE_REQUEST_MSG.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: jiangyiwen <jiangyiwen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Xue jiufei <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Static values are automatically initialized to NULL.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
In dlm_init, if create dlm_lockname_cache failed in
dlm_init_master_caches, it will destroy dlm_lockres_cache which created
before twice. And this will cause system die when loading modules.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We trigger a bug in __dlm_lockres_reserve_ast() when we parallel umount 4
nodes. The situation is as follows:
1) Node A migrate all lockres it owned(eg. lockres A) to other nodes
say node B when it umounts.
2) Receiving MIG_LOCKRES message from A, Node B masters the lockres A
with DLM_LOCK_RES_MIGRATING state set.
3) Then we umount ocfs2 on node B. It also should migrate lockres A to
another node, say node C. But now, DLM_LOCK_RES_MIGRATING state of
lockers A is not cleared. Node B triggered the BUG on lockres with
state DLM_LOCK_RES_MIGRATING.
Signed-off-by: Xuejiufei <xuejiufei@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: Tariq Saeed <tariq.x.saeed@oracle.com>
Cc: Srinivas Eeda <srinivas.eeda@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
[dan.carpenter@oracle.com: fix up some NULL dereference bugs]
Signed-off-by: Dong Fang <yp.fangdong@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
My static checker complains that this is called with a spin_lock held
in dlm_master_requery_handler() from dlmrecovery.c. Probably the reason
we have not received any bug reports about this is that recovery is not
a common operation.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
The inflight reference count, in the lock resource, is taken to pin the resource
in memory. We take it when a new resource is created and release it after a
lock is attached to it. We do this to prevent the resource from getting purged
prematurely.
Earlier this reference count was being taken for locally mastered resources
only. This patch extends the same functionality for remotely mastered ones.
We are doing this because the same premature purging could occur for remotely
mastered resources if the remote node were to die before completion of the
create lock.
Fix for Oracle bug#12405575.
Signed-off-by: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@oracle.com>
During dlm domain shutdown, o2dlm has to free all the lock resources. Ones that
have no locks and references are freed. Ones that have locks and/or references
are migrated to another node.
The first task in migration is finding a target. Currently we scan the lock
resource and find one node that either has a lock or a reference. This is not
very efficient in a parallel umount case as we might end up migrating the
lock resource to a node which itself may have to migrate it to a third node.
The patch scans the dlm->exit_domain_map to ensure the target node is not
leaving the domain. If no valid target node is found, o2dlm does not migrate
the resource but instead waits for the unlock and deref messages that will
allow it to free the resource.
Signed-off-by: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Patch cleans up the gunk added by commit 388c4bcb4e.
dlm_is_lockres_migrateable() now returns 1 if lockresource is deemed
migrateable and 0 if not.
Signed-off-by: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
During resource migration, if the target node were to die, the thread doing
the migration spins until the target node is not removed from the domain map.
This patch slows the spin by making the thread wait for the recovery to kick in.
Signed-off-by: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
ENTRY is used to record the entry of a function.
But because it is added in so many functions, if we enable it,
the system logs get filled up quickly and cause too much I/O.
So actually no one can open it for a production system or even
for a test.
So for mlog_entry_void, we just remove it.
for mlog_entry(...), we replace it with mlog(0,...), and they
will be replace by trace event later.
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
o2dlm was not migrating resources with zero locks because it assumed that that
resource would get purged by dlm_thread. However, some usage patterns involve
creating and dropping locks at a high rate leading to the migrate thread seeing
zero locks but the purge thread seeing an active reference. When this happens,
the dlm_thread cannot purge the resource and the migrate thread sees no reason
to migrate that resource. The spell is broken when the migrate thread catches
the resource with a lock.
The fix is to make the migrate thread also consider the reference map.
This usage pattern can be triggered by userspace on userdlm locks and flocks.
Signed-off-by: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
While umounting, a block mle doesn't get freed if dlm is shutdown after
master request is received but before assert master. This results in unclean
shutdown of dlm domain.
This patch frees all mles that lie around after other nodes were notified about
exiting the dlm and marking dlm state as leaving. Only block mles are expected
to be around, so we log ERROR for other mles but still free them.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Eeda <srinivas.eeda@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
When we need to take both dlm_domain_lock and dlm->spinlock, we should take
them in order of: dlm_domain_lock then dlm->spinlock.
There is pathes disobey this order. That is calling dlm_lockres_put() with
dlm->spinlock held in dlm_run_purge_list. dlm_lockres_put() calls dlm_put() at
the ref and dlm_put() locks on dlm_domain_lock.
Fix:
Don't grab/put the dlm when the initialising/releasing lockres.
That grab is not required because we don't call dlm_unregister_domain()
based on refcount.
Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
When we have to take both dlm->master_lock and lockres->spinlock,
take them in order
lockres->spinlock and then dlm->master_lock.
The patch fixes a violation of the rule.
We can simply move taking dlm->master_lock to where we have dropped res->spinlock
since when we access res->state and free mle memory we don't need master_lock's
protection.
Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
For migration, we are waiting for DLM_LOCK_RES_MIGRATING flag to be set
before sending DLM_MIG_LOCKRES_MSG message to the target. We are using
dlm_migration_can_proceed() for that purpose. However, if the node is
down, dlm_migration_can_proceed() will also return "go ahead". In this
rare case, the DLM_LOCK_RES_MIGRATING flag might not be set yet. Remove
the BUG_ON() that trips over this condition.
Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
* 'upstream-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jlbec/ocfs2: (47 commits)
ocfs2: Silence a gcc warning.
ocfs2: Don't retry xattr set in case value extension fails.
ocfs2:dlm: avoid dlm->ast_lock lockres->spinlock dependency break
ocfs2: Reset xattr value size after xa_cleanup_value_truncate().
fs/ocfs2/dlm: Use kstrdup
fs/ocfs2/dlm: Drop memory allocation cast
Ocfs2: Optimize punching-hole code.
Ocfs2: Make ocfs2_find_cpos_for_left_leaf() public.
Ocfs2: Fix hole punching to correctly do CoW during cluster zeroing.
Ocfs2: Optimize ocfs2 truncate to use ocfs2_remove_btree_range() instead.
ocfs2: Block signals for mkdir/link/symlink/O_CREAT.
ocfs2: Wrap signal blocking in void functions.
ocfs2/dlm: Increase o2dlm lockres hash size
ocfs2: Make ocfs2_extend_trans() really extend.
ocfs2/trivial: Code cleanup for allocation reservation.
ocfs2: make ocfs2_adjust_resv_from_alloc simple.
ocfs2: Make nointr a default mount option
ocfs2/dlm: Make o2dlm domain join/leave messages KERN_NOTICE
o2net: log socket state changes
ocfs2: print node # when tcp fails
...
Drop cast on the result of kmalloc and similar functions.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
type T;
@@
- (T *)
(\(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|kcalloc\|kmem_cache_alloc\|kmem_cache_zalloc\|
kmem_cache_alloc_node\|kmalloc_node\|kzalloc_node\)(...))
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
Masahiro Yamada