There are two types of the file extent - inline extent and regular extent,
When we log file extents, we didn't take inline extent into account, fix it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Consider the following case:
Task1 Task2
start_transaction
commit_transaction
check pending snapshots list and the
list is empty.
add pending snapshot into list
skip the delalloc flush
end_transaction
...
And then the problem that the snapshot is different with the source subvolume
happen.
This patch fixes the above problem by flush all pending stuffs when all the
other tasks end the transaction.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
If we flush inodes with pending delalloc in a transaction, we may join
the same transaction handler more than 2 times.
The reason is:
Task use_count of trans handle
commit_transaction 1
|-> btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes 1
|-> run_delalloc_nocow 1
|-> join_transaction 2
|-> cow_file_range 2
|-> join_transaction 3
In fact, cow_file_range needn't join the transaction again because the caller
have joined the transaction, so we fix this problem by this way.
Reported-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
btrfs_wait_ordered_range expects for 'len' instead of 'end'.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
When we log new names, we need to log just enough to recreate the inode
during log replay, and there is no need to log extents along with it.
This actually fixes a bug revealed by xfstests 241, where it shows
that we're logging some extents that have not updated metadata,
so we don't get proper EXTENT_DATA items to be copied to log tree.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
The current behavior is to allow mounting or remounting a filesystem
writeable in degraded mode if at least one writeable device is
present.
The next failed write access to a missing device which is above
the tolerance of the configured level of redundancy results in an
read-only enforcement. Even without this, the next time
barrier_all_devices() is called and more devices are missing than
tolerable, the switch to read-only mode takes place.
In order to behave predictably and to provide proper feedback to
the user at mount time, this patch compares the number of missing
devices with the number of devices that are tolerated to be missing
according to the configured RAID level. If more devices are missing
than tolerated, e.g. if two devices are missing in case of RAID1,
only a read-only mount and remount is allowed.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Remove an invalid size check up from btrfs_shrink_dev().
The new size should not larger than the device->total_bytes as it was
already verified before coming to here(i.e. new_size < old_size).
Remove invalid check up for btrfs_shrink_dev().
Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Though the process of the ordered extents is a bit different with the delalloc inode
flush, but we can see it as a subset of the delalloc inode flush, so we also handle
them by flush workers.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
The process of the ordered operations is similar to the delalloc inode flush, so
we handle them by flush workers.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
This patch introduce a new worker pool named "flush_workers", and if we
want to force all the inode with pending delalloc to the disks, we can
queue those inodes into the work queue of the worker pool, in this way,
those inodes will be flushed by multi-task.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Dave gave me an image of a very full file system that would abort the
transaction because it ran out of space while committing the transaction.
This is because we would think there was plenty of room to create a snapshot
even though the global reserve was not full. This happens because we
calculate the global reserve size before we unpin any space, so after we
unpin the space we allow reservations to occur even though we haven't
reserved all of the space for our global reserve. Fix this by adding to the
global reserve while unpinning in order to make sure we always have enough
space to do our work. With this patch we no longer end up with an aborted
transaction, we return ENOSPC properly to the person trying to create the
snapshot. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
The argument 'tree_mod_log' is not necessary since all of callers enable it.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Since we don't use MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_MOVING to add nritems
during rewinding, we should insert a MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE operation first.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Key MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_MOVING means that we're doing memmove inside
an extent buffer node, and the node's number of items remains unchanged
(unless we are inserting a single pointer, but we have MOD_LOG_KEY_ADD for that).
So we don't need to increase node's number of items during rewinding,
otherwise we may get an node larger than leafsize and cause general protection
errors later.
Here is the details,
- If we do memory move for inserting a single pointer, we need to
add node's nritems by one, and we honor MOD_LOG_KEY_ADD for adding.
- If we do memory move for deleting a single pointer, we need to
decrease node's nritems by one, and we honor MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE for
deleting.
- If we do memory move for balance left/right, we need to decrease
node's nritems, and we honor MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE for balaning.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
When we find a bitmap free space entry, we may check the previous extent
entry covers the offset or not. But if we find this entry is also a bitmap
entry, we will continue to check the previous entry of the current one by
a while loop. It is unnecessary because it is impossible that the extent
entry which is in front of a bitmap entry can cover the offset of the entry
after that bitmap entry.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Alex reported a problem where we were writing between chunks on a rbd
device. The thing is we do bio_add_page using logical offsets, but the
physical offset may be different. So when we map the bio now check to see
if the bio is still ok with the physical offset, and if it is not split the
bio up and redo the bio_add_page with the physical sector. This fixes the
problem for Alex and doesn't affect performance in the normal case. Thanks,
Reported-and-tested-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
In some places(such as: evicting inode), we just can not flush the reserved
space of delalloc, flushing the delayed directory index and delayed inode
is OK, but we don't try to flush those things and just go back when there is
no enough space to be reserved. This patch fixes this problem.
We defined 3 types of the flush operations: NO_FLUSH, FLUSH_LIMIT and FLUSH_ALL.
If we can in the transaction, we should not flush anything, or the deadlock
would happen, so use NO_FLUSH. If we flushing the reserved space of delalloc
would cause deadlock, use FLUSH_LIMIT. In the other cases, FLUSH_ALL is used,
and we will flush all things.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
The comment is not coincident with the code. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
div_factor{_fine} has been implemented for two times, cleanup it.
And I move them into a independent file named math.h because they are
common math functions.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Pull btrfs fixes from Chris Mason:
"This has our series of fixes for the next rc. The biggest batch is
from Jan Schmidt, fixing up some problems in our subvolume quota code
and fixing btrfs send/receive to work with the new extended inode
refs."
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
Btrfs: do not bug when we fail to commit the transaction
Btrfs: fix memory leak when cloning root's node
Btrfs: Use btrfs_update_inode_fallback when creating a snapshot
Btrfs: Send: preserve ownership (uid and gid) also for symlinks.
Btrfs: fix deadlock caused by the nested chunk allocation
btrfs: Return EINVAL when length to trim is less than FSB
Btrfs: fix memory leak in btrfs_quota_enable()
Btrfs: send correct rdev and mode in btrfs-send
Btrfs: extended inode refs support for send mechanism
Btrfs: Fix wrong error handling code
Fix a sign bug causing invalid memory access in the ino_paths ioctl.
Btrfs: comment for loop in tree_mod_log_insert_move
Btrfs: fix extent buffer reference for tree mod log roots
Btrfs: determine level of old roots
Btrfs: tree mod log's old roots could still be part of the tree
Btrfs: fix a tree mod logging issue for root replacement operations
Btrfs: don't put removals from push_node_left into tree mod log twice
We BUG if we fail to commit the transaction when creating a snapshot, which
is just obnoxious. Remove the BUG_ON(). Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
After cloning root's node, we forgot to dec the src's ref
which can lead to a memory leak.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
On a really full file system I was getting ENOSPC back from
btrfs_update_inode when trying to update the parent inode when creating a
snapshot. Just use the fallback method so we can update the inode and not
have to worry about having a delayed ref. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
This patch also requires a change in the user-space part of "receive".
We need to use "lchown" instead of "chown". We will do this in the
following patch.
Signed-off-by: Alex Lyakas <alex.btrfs@zadarastorage.com>
if (S_ISREG(sctx->cur_inode_mode)) {
Steps to reproduce:
# mkfs.btrfs -m raid1 <disk1> <disk2>
# btrfstune -S 1 <disk1>
# mount <disk1> <mnt>
# btrfs device add <disk3> <disk4> <mnt>
# mount -o remount,rw <mnt>
# dd if=/dev/zero of=<mnt>/tmpfile bs=1M count=1
Deadlock happened.
It is because of the nested chunk allocation. When we wrote the data
into the filesystem, we would allocate the data chunk because there was
no data chunk in the filesystem. At the end of the data chunk allocation,
we should insert the metadata of the data chunk into the extent tree, but
there was no raid1 chunk, so we tried to lock the chunk allocation mutex to
allocate the new chunk, but we had held the mutex, the deadlock happened.
By rights, we would allocate the raid1 chunk when we added the second device
because the profile of the seed filesystem is raid1 and we had two devices.
But we didn't do that in fact. It is because the last step of the first device
insertion didn't commit the transaction. So when we added the second device,
we didn't cow the tree, and just inserted the relative metadata into the leaves
which were generated by the first device insertion, and its profile was dup.
So, I fix this problem by commiting the transaction at the end of the first
device insertion.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Currently if len argument in btrfs_ioctl_fitrim() is smaller than
one FSB we will continue and finally return 0 bytes discarded.
However if the length to discard is smaller then file system block
we should really return EINVAL.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
gcc says "warning: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always
true" because i is an unsigned long. And gcc is right this time.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
To see the problem, create many hardlinks to the same file (120 should do it),
then look up paths by inode with:
ls -i
btrfs inspect inode-resolve -v $ino /mnt/btrfs
I noticed the memory layout of the fspath->val data had some irregularities
(some unnecessary gaps that stop appearing about halfway),
so I'm not sure there aren't any bugs left in it.
Emphasis the way tree_mod_log_insert_move avoids adding
MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_MOVING operations, depending on the direction of
the move operation.
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
In get_old_root we grab a lock on the extent buffer before we obtain a
reference on that buffer. That order is changed now.
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
In btrfs_find_all_roots' termination condition, we compare the level of the
old buffer we got from btrfs_search_old_slot to the level of the current
root node. We'd better compare it to the level of the rewinded root node.
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Tree mod log treated old root buffers as always empty buffers when starting
the rewind operations. However, the old root may still be part of the
current tree at a lower level, with still some valid entries.
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Avoid the implicit free by tree_mod_log_set_root_pointer, which is wrong in
two places. Where needed, we call tree_mod_log_free_eb explicitly now.
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Independant of the check (push_items < src_items) tree_mod_log_eb_copy did
log the removal of the old data entries from the source buffer. Therefore,
we must not call tree_mod_log_eb_move if the check evaluates to true, as
that would log the removal twice, finally resulting in (rewinded) buffers
with wrong values for header_nritems.
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Pull user namespace compile fixes from Eric W Biederman:
"This tree contains three trivial fixes. One compiler warning, one
thinko fix, and one build fix"
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace:
btrfs: Fix compilation with user namespace support enabled
userns: Fix posix_acl_file_xattr_userns gid conversion
userns: Properly print bluetooth socket uids
When compiling with user namespace support btrfs fails like:
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c: In function ‘fill_inode_item’:
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:2955:2: error: incompatible type for argument 3 of ‘btrfs_set_inode_uid’
fs/btrfs/ctree.h:2026:1: note: expected ‘u32’ but argument is of type ‘kuid_t’
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:2956:2: error: incompatible type for argument 3 of ‘btrfs_set_inode_gid’
fs/btrfs/ctree.h:2027:1: note: expected ‘u32’ but argument is of type ‘kgid_t’
Fix this by using i_uid_read and i_gid_read in
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
In order to accomodate retrying path-based syscalls, we need to add a
new "type" argument to audit_inode_child. This will tell us whether
we're looking for a child entry that represents a create or a delete.
If we find a parent, don't automatically assume that we need to create a
new entry. Instead, use the information we have to try to find an
existing entry first. Update it if one is found and create a new one if
not.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Most of the callers get called with an inode and dentry in the reverse
order. The compiler then has to reshuffle the arg registers and/or
stack in order to pass them on to audit_inode_child.
Reverse those arguments for a micro-optimization.
Reported-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Pull btrfs update from Chris Mason:
"This is a large pull, with the bulk of the updates coming from:
- Hole punching
- send/receive fixes
- fsync performance
- Disk format extension allowing more hardlinks inside a single
directory (btrfs-progs patch required to enable the compat bit for
this one)
I'm cooking more unrelated RAID code, but I wanted to make sure this
original batch makes it in. The largest updates here are relatively
old and have been in testing for some time."
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: (121 commits)
btrfs: init ref_index to zero in add_inode_ref
Btrfs: remove repeated eb->pages check in, disk-io.c/csum_dirty_buffer
Btrfs: fix page leakage
Btrfs: do not warn_on when we cannot alloc a page for an extent buffer
Btrfs: don't bug on enomem in readpage
Btrfs: cleanup pages properly when ENOMEM in compression
Btrfs: make filesystem read-only when submitting barrier fails
Btrfs: detect corrupted filesystem after write I/O errors
Btrfs: make compress and nodatacow mount options mutually exclusive
btrfs: fix message printing
Btrfs: don't bother committing delayed inode updates when fsyncing
btrfs: move inline function code to header file
Btrfs: remove unnecessary IS_ERR in bio_readpage_error()
btrfs: remove unused function btrfs_insert_some_items()
Btrfs: don't commit instead of overcommitting
Btrfs: confirmation of value is added before trace_btrfs_get_extent() is called
Btrfs: be smarter about dropping things from the tree log
Btrfs: don't lookup csums for prealloc extents
Btrfs: cache extent state when writing out dirty metadata pages
Btrfs: do not hold the file extent leaf locked when adding extent item
...
In csum_dirty_buffer, we first get eb from page->private.
Then we check if the page is the first page of eb. Later
we check it again. Remove the repeated check here.
Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
Alloc_dummy_extent_buffer will not free the first page in the eb array if we
fail to allocate a page, fix this. Thanks,
Reported-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
It's just annoying and the user will have gotten a nice OOM killer message
so they are already fully aware they are screwed :). Thanks,
Reported-by: Jérôme Poulin <jeromepoulin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Miao Xie