Since ARMv8.1 supplement introduced LSE atomic instructions back in 2016,
lets add support for STADD and use that in favor of LDXR / STXR loop for
the XADD mapping if available. STADD is encoded as an alias for LDADD with
XZR as the destination register, therefore add LDADD to the instruction
encoder along with STADD as special case and use it in the JIT for CPUs
that advertise LSE atomics in CPUID register. If immediate offset in the
BPF XADD insn is 0, then use dst register directly instead of temporary
one.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Prefetch-with-intent-to-write is currently part of the XADD mapping in
the AArch64 JIT and follows the kernel's implementation of atomic_add.
This may interfere with other threads executing the LDXR/STXR loop,
leading to potential starvation and fairness issues. Drop the optional
prefetch instruction.
Fixes: 85f68fe898 ("bpf, arm64: implement jiting of BPF_XADD")
Reported-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This work implements jiting of BPF_J{LT,LE,SLT,SLE} instructions
with BPF_X/BPF_K variants for the arm64 eBPF JIT.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Add support for JMP_CALL_X (tail call) introduced by commit 04fd61ab36
("bpf: allow bpf programs to tail-call other bpf programs").
bpf_tail_call() arguments:
ctx - context pointer passed to next program
array - pointer to map which type is BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY
index - index inside array that selects specific program to run
In this implementation arm64 JIT jumps into callee program after prologue,
so callee program reuses the same stack. For tail_call_cnt, we use the
callee-saved R26 (which was already saved/restored but previously unused
by JIT).
With this patch a tail call generates the following code on arm64:
if (index >= array->map.max_entries)
goto out;
34: mov x10, #0x10 // #16
38: ldr w10, [x1,x10]
3c: cmp w2, w10
40: b.ge 0x0000000000000074
if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
goto out;
tail_call_cnt++;
44: mov x10, #0x20 // #32
48: cmp x26, x10
4c: b.gt 0x0000000000000074
50: add x26, x26, #0x1
prog = array->ptrs[index];
if (prog == NULL)
goto out;
54: mov x10, #0x68 // #104
58: ldr x10, [x1,x10]
5c: ldr x11, [x10,x2]
60: cbz x11, 0x0000000000000074
goto *(prog->bpf_func + prologue_size);
64: mov x10, #0x20 // #32
68: ldr x10, [x11,x10]
6c: add x10, x10, #0x20
70: br x10
74:
Signed-off-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In the case of division by zero in a BPF program:
A = A / X; (X == 0)
the expected behavior is to terminate with return value 0.
This is confirmed by the test case introduced in commit 86bf1721b2
("test_bpf: add tests checking that JIT/interpreter sets A and X to 0.").
Reported-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
CC: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: e54bcde3d6 ("arm64: eBPF JIT compiler")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18+
Signed-off-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Upper bits should be zeroed in endianness conversion:
- even when there's no need to change endianness (i.e., BPF_FROM_BE
on big endian or BPF_FROM_LE on little endian);
- after rev16.
This patch fixes such bugs by emitting extra instructions to clear
upper bits.
Cc: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Fixes: e54bcde3d6 ("arm64: eBPF JIT compiler")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18+
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Commit 72b603ee8c ("bpf: x86: add missing 'shift by register'
instructions to x64 eBPF JIT") noted support for 'shift by register'
in eBPF and added support for it for x64. Let's enable this for arm64
as well.
The arm64 eBPF JIT compiler now passes the new 'shift by register'
test case introduced in the same commit 72b603ee8c.
Signed-off-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
The JIT compiler emits A64 instructions. It supports eBPF only.
Legacy BPF is supported thanks to conversion by BPF core.
JIT is enabled in the same way as for other architectures:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
Or for additional compiler output:
echo 2 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
See Documentation/networking/filter.txt for more information.
The implementation passes all 57 tests in lib/test_bpf.c
on ARMv8 Foundation Model :) Also tested by Will on Juno platform.
Signed-off-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Daniel Borkmann