Use proc_create()/proc_create_data() to make sure that ->proc_fops and ->data
be setup before gluing PDE to main tree.
Add correct ->owner to proc_fops to fix reading/module unloading race.
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* Use new set_cpus_allowed_ptr() function added by previous patch,
which instead of passing the "newly allowed cpus" cpumask_t arg
by value, pass it by pointer:
-int set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, cpumask_t new_mask)
+int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p, const cpumask_t *new_mask)
* Modify CPU_MASK_ALL
Depends on:
[sched-devel]: sched: add new set_cpus_allowed_ptr function
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
According to ACPI spec, the _TSD object provides T-state control cross
logical processor dependency information to OSPM. So the t-state
coordination should be considered when T-state for one cpu is changed.
According to ACPI spec, three types of coordination are defined.
SW_ALL, SW_ANY and HW_ALL.
SW_ALL: it means that OSPM needs to initiate T-state transition on
all processors in the domain. It is necessary to call throttling set function
for all affected cpus.
SW_ANY: it means that OSPM may initiate T-state transition on any processor in
the domain.
HW_ALL: Spec only says that hardware will perform the coordination and doesn't
recommend how OSPM coordinate T-state among the affected cpus. So it is treated
as the type of SW_ALL. It means that OSPM needs to initiate t-state transition
on all the processors in the domain.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The t-state coordination should be considered when T-state for one cpu
is changed.It means that OSPM should select one proper target T-state for
the all affected cpus before updating T-state.
So the function of acpi_processor_throttling_notifier is added.
Before updating T-state it can be called for all the affected cpus to get
the proper target T-state, which can meet the requirement of thermal, user and
_TPC. After updating T-state, it can be called to update T-state flag.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Accordint to ACPI spec, the _TSD object provides T-state control cross
logical processor dependency information to OSPM.
After the _TSD data for all cpus are obtained, OSPM will set up
the T-state coordination between CPUs.
Of course if the _TSD doesn't exist or _TSD data is incorrect , it is
assumed that there is no T-state coordination and T-state is changed
independently.
Now there is no proper solution to update T-state coordination after
one cpu is hotplugged. So this patch won't support hotplugged cpu very well.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
It is necessary to check the parameter when calling the function of
acpi_processor_get/set_throttling function so as to avoid the NULL
pointer reference in pr or throttling.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9747
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The IRQ operation(enable/disable) should be avoided when throttling is
controlled via PTC method. It is replaced by the migration of task.
This fixes an oops on T61 -- a regression due to
f79f06ab9f b/c FixedHW support tried to read remote MSR with interrupts disabled.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Add throttling control via MSR when T-states uses
the FixHW Control Status registers.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
_TSS was erroneously ignored, in favor of the FADT.
When TSS is used, the access width is included in the PTC control/status
register. So it is unnecessary that the access bit width is multiplied by 8.
At the same time the bit_offset should be considered for system I/O Access.
It should be checked the bit_width and bit_offset of PTC regsiter in order to
avoid the failure of system I/O access. It means that bit_width plus
bit_offset can't be greater than 32.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Change the function interface for throttling control via PTC.
The following functions are concerned:
acpi_read_throttling_status()
acpi_write_throttling_state()
acpi_get_throttling_value()
acpi_get_throttling_state()
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Factor out legacy FADT.duty_width code
and run it only in the non _TSS case.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
When a T-state limit change notification is received,
Linux must evaluate _TPC and change its current
T-state immediately to comply with the new limit.
Previously, Linux would notice the new limit
only upon the next throttling change.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
ACPI Exception (processor_throttling-0084): AE_NOT_FOUND, Evaluating _PTC [20070126]
ACPI Exception (processor_throttling-0147): AE_NOT_FOUND, Evaluating _TSS [20070126]
These methods are optional, so Linux should not
alarm users when they are not found.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8802
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Acked-by: Luming Yu <luming.yu@intel.com>
make 2 needlessly global functions static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
cosmetic only
Make "module name" actually match the file name.
Invoke with ';' as leaving it off confuses Lindent and gcc doesn't care.
Fix indentation where Lindent did get confused.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
acpi_processor_write_throttling()
acpi_processor_write_limit()
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
acpi_processor_limit_fops.write was written at run time,
but can be initiailized at compile-time instead.
Similar for acpi_video_bus_POST_fops.write and friends,
but keep doing those at runtime to avoid prototype-hell.
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
Denis V. Lunev