VSC SDP Payload for PSR is one of data block type of SDP (Secondaray Data
Packet). In order to generalize SDP packet structure name, it renames
struct edp_vsc_psr to struct dp_sdp. And each SDP data blocks have
different usages, each SDP type has different reserved data blocks and
Video_Stream_Configuration Extension VESA SDP might use all of Data Blocks
as Extended INFORFRAME Data Byte. so it makes Data Block variables as
array type. And it adds comments of details of DB of VSC SDP Payload
for Pixel Encoding/Colorimetry Format. This comments follows DP 1.4a spec,
section 2.2.5.7.5, chapter "VSC SDP Payload for Pixel Encoding/Colorimetry
Format".
v7: Addressed review comments from Ville.
v9: Rename a member value name DB to db on struct dp_sdp [Laurent]
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190521121721.32010-3-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
This patch checks a support of YCBCR420 outputs on an encoder level.
If the input mode is YCBCR420-only mode then it prepares DP as an YCBCR420
output, else it continues with RGB output mode.
It set output_format to INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_YCBCR420 in order to using
a pipe scaler as RGB to YCbCr 4:4:4.
v2:
Addressed review comments from Ville.
Style fixed with few naming.
%s/config/crtc_state/
%s/intel_crtc/crtc/
If lscon is active, it makes not to call intel_dp_ycbcr420_config()
to avoid to clobber of lspcon_ycbcr420_config() routine.
And it move the 420_only check into the intel_dp_ycbcr420_config().
v3: Fix uninitialized return value and it is reported by Dan Carpenter.
v4:
Addressed review comments from Ville.
In order to avoid the extra indentation, it inverts if-clause on
intel_dp_ycbcr420_config().
Remove the error print where no errors print are allowed.
v6: Rebase
v7:
Move intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status() to intel_dp from intel_psr.
intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status() checks
VSC_SDP_EXTENSION_FOR_COLORIMETRY_SUPPORTED bit in the
DPRX_FEATURE_ENUMERATION_LIST register.
And intel_dp_ycbcr420_config() uses intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status().
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190521121721.32010-2-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
This interlaced mode restriction applies to all gens, not only to
Haswell.
Also while at it updating the debug message to.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190406005112.27205-4-jose.souza@intel.com
Even when driver is reloaded and hits this scenario the PSR mutex
should be initialized, otherwise reading PSR debugfs status will
execute mutex_lock() over a mutex that was not initialized.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190406005112.27205-3-jose.souza@intel.com
Turn out it is not a DMC bug it is actually a HW one, so this
workaround will be needed for current gens, lets update the comment
and remove the FIXME.
BSpec: 7723
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190406005112.27205-1-jose.souza@intel.com
It used to be handy that we only had a couple of headers, but over time
intel_drv.h has become unwieldy. Extract declarations to a separate
header file corresponding to the implementation module, clarifying the
modularity of the driver.
Ensure the new header is self-contained, and do so with minimal further
includes, using forward declarations as needed. Include the new header
only where needed, and sort the modified include directives while at it
and as needed.
No functional changes.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/679c857a1933ee3d0706f978ab05ca880cd30a00.1554461791.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
It used to be handy that we only had a couple of headers, but over time
intel_drv.h has become unwieldy. Extract declarations to a separate
header file corresponding to the implementation module, clarifying the
modularity of the driver.
Ensure the new header is self-contained, and do so with minimal further
includes, using forward declarations as needed. Include the new header
only where needed, and sort the modified include directives while at it
and as needed.
No functional changes.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/f86f9beed730eaad0bdcc18b18817b3d221e16e2.1554461791.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
It used to be handy that we only had a couple of headers, but over time
intel_drv.h has become unwieldy. Extract declarations to a separate
header file corresponding to the implementation module, clarifying the
modularity of the driver.
Ensure the new header is self-contained, and do so with minimal further
includes, using forward declarations as needed. Include the new header
only where needed, and sort the modified include directives while at it
and as needed.
No functional changes.
v2: Fix checkpatch whitespace complaint
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7e776690bf139ccdd0306b30df08dc68e74603de.1554461791.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
The intel_uncore structure is the owner of register access, so
subclass the function to it.
While at it, use a local uncore var and switch to the new read/write
functions where it makes sense.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190325214940.23632-9-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
There is probably a issue in DMC firmwares(icl_dmc_ver1_07.bin and
kbl_dmc_ver1_04.bin at least) that causes PSR2 SU to fail after
exiting DC6 if EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL is kept in PSR_CTL, so for now
lets workaround the issue by cleaning PSR_CTL before enable PSR2.
v2:
- Updated commit description and comment to state that it may be
a DMC firmware issue (Rodrigo)
- No need to RMW, let's write 0 to PSR_CTL(Dhinakaran)
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190314230113.6571-1-jose.souza@intel.com
When any other value than EDP_PSR_TP4_TIME_0US is set, TPS1 and TPS4
will be used to do the link training when exiting PSR1.
Happily the eDP panels tested so far was able to sync with source
even without HBR3/TPS4 support but let use the right training
pattern.
TPS4 support was added to PSR1 registers because HBR3/PSR
specification was not closed when ICL was freezed so if HBR3 was
supported by PSR, ICL would already be ready but it was not added to
specification so lets always disable TPS4.
v3: Missed ";" SPANK SPANK SPANK!!!
BSpec: 17524
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190312195743.8829-3-jose.souza@intel.com
This will make hsw_activate_psr1() more easy to read and will make
future modification to TPS registers more easy to review and read.
v4: Rename new function to intel_psr1_get_tp_time() (Dhinakaran and
Rodrigo)
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190312195743.8829-2-jose.souza@intel.com
A new field with the training pattern(TP) wakeup time for PSR2 was
added to VBT, so lets use it when available otherwise it will
fallback to PSR1 wakeup time.
v2: replacing enum to numerical usec time (Jani)
BSpec: 20131
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190312195743.8829-1-jose.souza@intel.com
The support for PSR2 was polished, IGT tests for PSR2 was added and
it was tested performing regular user workloads like browsing,
editing documents and compiling Linux, so it is time to enable it by
default and enjoy even more power-savings.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190308000050.6226-9-jose.souza@intel.com
If PSR1 is active when pipe CRC is enabled the CRC calculations will
be inhibit by the transition to low power states that PSR1 brings.
So lets force a PSR1 exit and as soon as pipe CRC is enabled it will
block PSR1 activation and avoid CRC timeouts when running IGT tests.
There is a little window between the call to force exit PSR and the
write to pipe CRC registers that needs to happen within the minimum
of 6 idles frames otherwise PSR1 will be active again causing the CRC
timeouts but anyways this will at least reduce the occurrence of CRC
timeouts.
This can possibily fix issues present right now but I did not found
any open, I mostly got this issue from previous CI runs of this
series, bellow some exambles:
* igt@kms_color@pipe-b-ctm-0-75:
- shard-apl: PASS -> FAIL +9
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-busy-crc-legacy:
- shard-apl: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL +17
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-indfb-pgflip-blt:
- shard-kbl: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL +12
* igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@read-crc-pipe-c:
- shard-kbl: PASS -> FAIL +7
v6: s/PSR/PSR1 (Dhinakaran)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190308000050.6226-8-jose.souza@intel.com
All of this checks are redudant and can be removed as the if bellow
already takes care when there is no changes in the state.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190308000050.6226-7-jose.souza@intel.com
When PSR2 is active aka after the number of frames programmed in
PSR2_CTL 'Frames Before SU Entry' hardware stops to generate CRC
interrupts causing IGT tests to fail due timeout.
This same behavior don't happen with PSR1, as soon as pipe CRC is
enabled it blocks PSR1 activation so CRC calculation continues to
happens normaly.
This patch also set mode_changed as true when PSR is available to
force atomic check functions to compute new PSR state, otherwise PSR2
would not be disabled.
v4: Only setting mode_changed if has_psr is set(Dhinakaran)
v3: Reusing intel_crtc_crc_prepare() and crc_enabled, only setting
mode_changed if it can do PSR.
v2: Changed commit description to describe that PSR2 inhibit CRC
calculations.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190308000050.6226-6-jose.souza@intel.com
If has_psr is set it means that CRTC has a EDP panel attached so the
EDP check is redundant and can be dropped.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190308000050.6226-4-jose.souza@intel.com
Forcing a specific CRTC to the eDP connector was causing the
intel_psr_fastset_force() to mark mode_chaged in the wrong and
disabled CRTC causing no update in the PSR state.
Looks like our internal state track do not clear output_types and
has_psr in the disabled CRTCs, not sure if this is the expected
behavior or not but in the mean time this fix the issue.
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190308000050.6226-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Now we are checking sink capabilities when probing PSR DPCD register
and then dynamically checking in if new state is compatible with PSR
in, so this FIXME can be dropped.
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190308000050.6226-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Changing the i915_edp_psr_debug was enabling, disabling or switching
PSR version by directly calling intel_psr_disable_locked() and
intel_psr_enable_locked(), what is not the default PSR path that will
be executed by real users.
So lets force a fastset in the PSR CRTC to trigger a pipe update and
stress the default code path.
Recently a bug was found when switching from PSR2 to PSR1 while
enable_psr kernel parameter was set to the default parameter, this
changes fix it and also fixes the bug linked bellow were DRRS was
left enabled together with PSR when enabling PSR from debugfs.
v2: Handling missing case: disabled to PSR1
v3: Not duplicating the whole atomic state(Maarten)
v4: Adding back the missing call to intel_psr_irq_control(Dhinakaran)
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108341
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190206211845.5322-1-jose.souza@intel.com
For now PSR2 is still disabled by default for all platforms but is
our intention to let debugfs to enable it for debug and tests
proporses, so intel_psr2_enabled() that is also used by debugfs to
decide if PSR2 is going to be enabled needs to take in consideration
the debug field.
v2: Using the switch/case that intel_psr2_enabled() already had to
handle this(DK)
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190117205548.28378-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Mixed C99 and kernel types use is getting ugly. Prefer kernel types.
sed -i 's/\buint\(8\|16\|32\|64\)_t\b/u\1/g'
Minor checkpatch fixes sprinkled on top of the changed lines.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/14ed72e7f04c9340a057855c5950b54811f8a477.1547629303.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Needs just a few additional includes here and there.
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190108082709.3748-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Define IS_GEN() similarly to our IS_GEN_RANGE(). but use gen instead of
gen_mask to do the comparison. Now callers can pass then gen as a parameter,
so we don't require one macro for each gen.
The following spatch was used to convert the users of these macros:
@@
expression e;
@@
(
- IS_GEN2(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 2)
|
- IS_GEN3(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 3)
|
- IS_GEN4(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 4)
|
- IS_GEN5(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 5)
|
- IS_GEN6(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 6)
|
- IS_GEN7(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 7)
|
- IS_GEN8(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 8)
|
- IS_GEN9(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 9)
|
- IS_GEN10(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 10)
|
- IS_GEN11(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 11)
)
v2: use IS_GEN rather than GT_GEN and compare to info.gen rather than
using the bitmask
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181212181044.15886-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
According to eDP spec, sink can required specific selective update
granularity that source must comply.
Here caching the value if required and checking if source supports
it.
v3:
- Returning the default granularity in case DPCD read fails(Dhinakaran)
- Changed DPCD error message level(Dhinakaran)
v4:
- Setting granularity to defaul when granularity read is equal to
0(Dhinakaran)
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181204003403.23361-9-jose.souza@intel.com
Selective updates have a default granularity requirements as stated
by eDP spec(PSR2 SELECTIVE UPDATE X GRANULARITY CAPABILITY register
definition), so check if HW can match those requirements before
enabling PSR2.
v3:
- Changes in the comments and commit message(Dhinakaran)
- Printing the hdisplay that do not match with default granularity
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181204003403.23361-8-jose.souza@intel.com
Our frontbuffer tracking improved over the years + the WA #0884
helped us keep PSR2 enabled while triggering screen updates when
necessary so this FIXME is not valid anymore.
Acked-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181204003403.23361-6-jose.souza@intel.com
For ICL the bit 12 of CHICKEN_TRANS is reserved so we should not
touch it and as by default VSC_DATA_SEL_SOFTWARE_CONTROL is already
unset in gen10 + GLK we can just drop it and fix for both gens.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181204003403.23361-5-jose.souza@intel.com
eDP spec states 2 different bits to enable sink to trigger a
interruption when there is a CRC mismatch.
DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION is for PSR only and
DP_PSR_IRQ_HPD_WITH_CRC_ERRORS is for PSR2 only.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181204003403.23361-4-jose.souza@intel.com
As we have a else block for the 'if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) {'
and this bit is only set for PSR1 move it to that block to make it
more easy to read.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181204003403.23361-3-jose.souza@intel.com
For PSR2 there is no register to tell HW to keep main link enabled
while PSR2 is active, so don't configure sink DPCD with a
misleading value.
v2: Moving the set of DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION to the else block
of 'if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled)' to another patch. (Rodrigo)
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181204003403.23361-2-jose.souza@intel.com
i915 yet don't support PSR in Apple panels, so lets keep it disabled
while we work on that.
v2: Renamed DP_DPCD_QUIRK_PSR_NOT_CURRENTLY_SUPPORTED to
DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_PSR (Ville)
v3:
Adding documentation to DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_PSR(Dhinakaran and Jani)
Fixed typo in comment of the new quirk entry(Jani)
Fixes: 598c6cfe06 (drm/i915/psr: Enable PSR1 on gen-9+ HW)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181204003403.23361-1-jose.souza@intel.com
As stated in struct drm_encoder, crtc field should only be used
by non-atomic drivers.
So here caching the pipe id in intel_psr_enable() what is way more
simple and efficient than at every call to
intel_psr_flush()/invalidate() get the
drm.mode_config.connection_mutex lock to safely be able to get the
pipe id by reading drm_connector_state.crtc.
This should fix the null pointer dereference crash below as the
previous way to get the pipe id was prone to race conditions.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105959
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181128072838.22773-1-jose.souza@intel.com
If a eDP panel supports both PSR2 and VDSC, our HW cannot
support both at a time. Give priority to PSR2 if a requested
resolution can be supported without compression else enable
VDSC and keep PSR2 disabled.
v4:
Fix the unrealted stuff removed during rebase (Ville)
v3:
* Rebase
v2:
* Add warning for DSC and PSR2 enabled together (DK)
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181128202628.20238-3-manasi.d.navare@intel.com
We should not access hardware while computing config also we don't
support stereo 3D so this test was never true.
Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181121225441.18785-6-jose.souza@intel.com
If a PSR error happened and the driver is reloaded, the EDP_PSR_IIR
will still keep the error set even after the reset done in the
irq_preinstall and irq_uninstall hooks.
And enabling in this situation cause the screen to freeze in the
first time that PSR HW tries to activate so lets keep PSR disabled
to avoid any rendering problems.
v5: rebased: using edp_psr_shift()
v4: Moved handling from intel_psr_compute_config() to
intel_psr_init() to avoid hardware access during compute(Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
squash
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181121225441.18785-5-jose.souza@intel.com
While PSR is active hardware will do aux transactions by it self to
wakeup sink to receive a new frame when necessary. If that
transaction is not acked by sink, hardware will trigger this
interruption.
So let's disable PSR as it is a hint that there is problem with this
sink.
The removed FIXME was asking to manually train the link but we don't
need to do that as by spec sink should do a short pulse when it is
out of sync with source, we just need to make sure it is awaken and
the SDP header with PSR inactive set it will trigger the short pulse
with a error set in the link status.
v3: added workarround to fix scheduled work starvation cause by
to frequent PSR error interruption
v4: only setting irq_aux_error as we don't care in clear it and
not using dev_priv->irq_lock as consequence.
v5: rebased: using edp_psr_shift()
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181121225441.18785-4-jose.souza@intel.com
When we detect a error and disable PSR, it is kept disabled until the
next modeset but as the sink already show signs that it do not
properly work with PSR lets disabled it for good to avoid any
additional flickering.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181121225441.18785-3-jose.souza@intel.com
When a PSR error happens sink sets the PSR error register and also
set the link status to a error status.
So in the short pulse handling it was returning earlier and doing a
full detection and attempting to retrain but it fails as PSR HW is
in change of the main-link.
Just call intel_psr_short_pulse() before
intel_dp_needs_link_retrain() is not the right fix as
intel_dp_needs_link_retrain() would return true and trigger a full
detection while PSR HW is still in change of main-link.
Check for PSR active is also not safe as it could be inactive due a
frontbuffer invalidate and still doing the PSR exit sequence.
v3: added comment in intel_dp_needs_link_retrain()
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181121225441.18785-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Depending on the transcoder enum values to translate from transcoder to
the corresponding CHICKEN_TRANS register can easily break if we add a
new transcoder. Add an explicit mapping instead, by using helpers to
look up the register instance either by transcoder or port (since
unconveniently the registers have both port and transcoder specific
bits).
While at it also check for the correctness of GEN, port, transcoder. I
wasn't sure if psr2_enabled can only be set for GEN9+, but that seems to
be the case indeed (see setting of sink_psr2_support in
intel_psr_init_dpcd()).
v2 (Ville):
- Make gen9_chicken_trans_reg() internal to intel_psr.c.
- s/trans/cpu_transcoder/
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181119180021.370-1-imre.deak@intel.com
Depending on the transcoder enum values to translate from transcoder
to EDP PSR flags can easily break if we add a new transcoder. So remove
the dependency by using an explicit mapping.
While at it also add a WARN for unexpected trancoders.
v2:
- Simplify things by defining flag shift values instead of indices.
- s/trans/cpu_transcoder/ (Ville)
v3:
- Define flags to look like separate bits instead of the values of
the same bitfield. (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181120092325.21249-2-imre.deak@intel.com
In the past we had hooks to configure HW for VLV/CHV too, in the drop
of VLV/CHV support the intel_psr_disable_source() code was not moved
to the caller, so doing it here.
Suggested-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181106190843.18009-4-jose.souza@intel.com
It should always wait for idle state when disabling PSR because PSR
could be inactive due a call to intel_psr_exit() and while PSR is
still being disabled asynchronously userspace could change the
modeset causing a call to psr_disable() that will not wait for PSR
idle and then PSR will be enabled again while PSR is still not idle.
v2: rebased on top of the patch reusing psr_exit()
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181106190843.18009-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Both functions have the same code to disable PSR, so let's reuse that
code instead of duplicate.
Suggested-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181106190843.18009-1-jose.souza@intel.com
This WA also works fine for PSR2, triggering a selective update when
possible.
Acked-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181003205031.32474-4-jose.souza@intel.com
ICL spec states that this bit is now reserved.
Bspec: 7722
v2(Dhinakaran and Jani):
- instead of remove bit in gen11 now only setting if if gen < 11
- changed commit title
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181003205031.32474-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Gwan-gyeong Mun