According to the PowerISA 2.07, mtspr and mfspr should not always
generate an illegal instruction exception when being used with an
undefined SPR, but rather treat the instruction as a NOP or inject a
privilege exception in some cases, too - depending on the SPR number.
Also turn the printk here into a ratelimited print statement, so that
the guest can not flood the dmesg log of the host by issueing lots of
illegal mtspr/mfspr instruction here.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
The MMCR2 register is available twice, one time with number 785
(privileged access), and one time with number 769 (unprivileged,
but it can be disabled completely). In former times, the Linux
kernel was using the unprivileged register 769 only, but since
commit 8dd75ccb57 ("powerpc: Use privileged SPR number
for MMCR2"), it uses the privileged register 785 instead.
The KVM-PR code then of course also switched to use the SPR 785,
but this is causing older guest kernels to crash, since these
kernels still access 769 instead. So to support older kernels
with KVM-PR again, we have to support register 769 in KVM-PR, too.
Fixes: 8dd75ccb57
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.10+
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
POWER8 has one virtual timebase (VTB) register per subcore, not one
per CPU thread. The HV KVM code currently treats VTB as a per-thread
register, which can lead to spurious soft lockup messages from guests
which use the VTB as the time source for the soft lockup detector.
(CPUs before POWER8 did not have the VTB register.)
For HV KVM, this fixes the problem by making only the primary thread
in each virtual core save and restore the VTB value. With this,
the VTB state becomes part of the kvmppc_vcore structure. This
also means that "piggybacking" of multiple virtual cores onto one
subcore is not possible on POWER8, because then the virtual cores
would share a single VTB register.
PR KVM emulates a VTB register, which is per-vcpu because PR KVM
has no notion of CPU threads or SMT. For PR KVM we move the VTB
state into the kvmppc_vcpu_book3s struct.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.14+
Reported-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
When compiling the KVM code for POWER with "make C=1", sparse
complains about functions missing proper prototypes and a 64-bit
constant missing the ULL prefix. Let's fix this by making the
functions static or by including the proper header with the
prototypes, and by appending a ULL prefix to the constant
PPC_MPPE_ADDRESS_MASK.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
We handle FSCR feature bits (well, TAR only really today) lazily when the guest
starts using them. So when a guest activates the bit and later uses that feature
we enable it for real in hardware.
However, when the guest stops using that bit we don't stop setting it in
hardware. That means we can potentially lose a trap that the guest expects to
happen because it thinks a feature is not active.
This patch adds support to drop TAR when then guest turns it off in FSCR. While
at it it also restricts FSCR access to 64bit systems - 32bit ones don't have it.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Writing to IC is not allowed in the privileged mode.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
virtual time base register is a per VM, per cpu register that needs
to be saved and restored on vm exit and entry. Writing to VTB is not
allowed in the privileged mode.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[agraf: fix compile error]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
We use time base for PURR and SPURR emulation with PR KVM since we
are emulating a single threaded core. When using time base
we need to make sure that we don't accumulate time spent in the host
in PURR and SPURR value.
Also we don't need to emulate mtspr because both the registers are
hypervisor resource.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
There are LE Linux guests out there that don't handle hypercalls correctly.
Instead of interpreting the instruction stream from device tree as big endian
they assume it's a little endian instruction stream and fail.
When we see an illegal instruction from such a byte reversed instruction stream,
bail out graciously and just declare every hcall as error.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Use make_dsisr instead of open coding it. This also have
the added benefit of handling alignment interrupt on additional
instructions.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Although it's optional, IBM POWER cpus always had DAR value set on
alignment interrupt. So don't try to compute these values.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
POWER8 introduces transactional memory which brings along a number of new
registers and MSR bits.
Implementing all of those is a pretty big headache, so for now let's at least
emulate enough to make Linux's context switching code happy.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
POWER8 introduces a new facility called the "Event Based Branch" facility.
It contains of a few registers that indicate where a guest should branch to
when a defined event occurs and it's in PR mode.
We don't want to really enable EBB as it will create a big mess with !PR guest
mode while hardware is in PR and we don't really emulate the PMU anyway.
So instead, let's just leave it at emulation of all its registers.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
POWER8 introduced a new interrupt type called "Facility unavailable interrupt"
which contains its status message in a new register called FSCR.
Handle these exits and try to emulate instructions for unhandled facilities.
Follow-on patches enable KVM to expose specific facilities into the guest.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
In parallel to the Processor ID Register (PIR) threaded POWER8 also adds a
Thread ID Register (TIR). Since PR KVM doesn't emulate more than one thread
per core, we can just always expose 0 here.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
When we expose a POWER8 CPU into the guest, it will start accessing PMU SPRs
that we don't emulate. Just ignore accesses to them.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
The shared (magic) page is a data structure that contains often used
supervisor privileged SPRs accessible via memory to the user to reduce
the number of exits we have to take to read/write them.
When we actually share this structure with the guest we have to maintain
it in guest endianness, because some of the patch tricks only work with
native endian load/store operations.
Since we only share the structure with either host or guest in little
endian on book3s_64 pr mode, we don't have to worry about booke or book3s hv.
For booke, the shared struct stays big endian. For book3s_64 hv we maintain
the struct in host native endian, since it never gets shared with the guest.
For book3s_64 pr we introduce a variable that tells us which endianness the
shared struct is in and route every access to it through helper inline
functions that evaluate this variable.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
This patch add a new callback kvmppc_ops. This will help us in enabling
both HV and PR KVM together in the same kernel. The actual change to
enable them together is done in the later patch in the series.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[agraf: squash in booke changes]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Currently PR-style KVM keeps the volatile guest register values
(R0 - R13, CR, LR, CTR, XER, PC) in a shadow_vcpu struct rather than
the main kvm_vcpu struct. For 64-bit, the shadow_vcpu exists in two
places, a kmalloc'd struct and in the PACA, and it gets copied back
and forth in kvmppc_core_vcpu_load/put(), because the real-mode code
can't rely on being able to access the kmalloc'd struct.
This changes the code to copy the volatile values into the shadow_vcpu
as one of the last things done before entering the guest. Similarly
the values are copied back out of the shadow_vcpu to the kvm_vcpu
immediately after exiting the guest. We arrange for interrupts to be
still disabled at this point so that we can't get preempted on 64-bit
and end up copying values from the wrong PACA.
This means that the accessor functions in kvm_book3s.h for these
registers are greatly simplified, and are same between PR and HV KVM.
In places where accesses to shadow_vcpu fields are now replaced by
accesses to the kvm_vcpu, we can also remove the svcpu_get/put pairs.
Finally, on 64-bit, we don't need the kmalloc'd struct at all any more.
With this, the time to read the PVR one million times in a loop went
from 567.7ms to 575.5ms (averages of 6 values), an increase of about
1.4% for this worse-case test for guest entries and exits. The
standard deviation of the measurements is about 11ms, so the
difference is only marginally significant statistically.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
We don't emulate breakpoints yet, so just ignore reads and writes
to / from DABR.
This fixes booting of more recent Linux guest kernels for me.
Reported-by: Nello Martuscielli <ppc.addon@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Nello Martuscielli <ppc.addon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Currently the instruction emulator code returns EMULATE_EXIT_USER
and common code initializes the "run->exit_reason = .." and
"vcpu->arch.hcall_needed = .." with one fixed reason.
But there can be different reasons when emulator need to exit
to user space. To support that the "run->exit_reason = .."
and "vcpu->arch.hcall_needed = .." initialization is moved a
level up to emulator.
Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Instruction emulation return EMULATE_DO_PAPR when it requires
exit to userspace on book3s. Similar return is required
for booke. EMULATE_DO_PAPR reads out to be confusing so it is
renamed to EMULATE_EXIT_USER.
Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
On mfspr/mtspr emulation path Book3E's MMUCFG SPR with value 1015 clashes
with G4's MSSSR0 SPR. Move MSSSR0 emulation from generic part to Books3S.
MSSSR0 also clashes with Book3S's DABRX SPR. DABRX was not explicitly
handled so Book3S execution flow will behave as before.
Signed-off-by: Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
When running on top of pHyp, the hypercall instruction "sc 1" goes
straight into pHyp without trapping in supervisor mode.
So if we want to support PAPR guest in this configuration we need to
add a second way of accessing PAPR hypercalls, preferably with the
exact same semantics except for the instruction.
So let's overlay an officially reserved instruction and emulate PAPR
hypercalls whenever we hit that one.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
This adds basic emulation of the PURR and SPURR registers. We assume
we are emulating a single-threaded core, so these advance at the same
rate as the timebase. A Linux kernel running on a POWER7 expects to
be able to access these registers and is not prepared to handle a
program interrupt on accessing them.
This also adds a very minimal emulation of the DSCR (data stream
control register). Writes are ignored and reads return zero.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
When reading and writing SPRs, every SPR emulation piece had to read
or write the respective GPR the value was read from or stored in itself.
This approach is pretty prone to failure. What if we accidentally
implement mfspr emulation where we just do "break" and nothing else?
Suddenly we would get a random value in the return register - which is
always a bad idea.
So let's consolidate the generic code paths and only give the core
specific SPR handling code readily made variables to read/write from/to.
Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything, but it increases the
readability of the code and makes is less prone to bugs.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Instructions on PPC are pretty similarly encoded. So instead of
every instruction emulation code decoding the instruction fields
itself, we can move that code to more generic places and rely on
the compiler to optimize the unused bits away.
This has 2 advantages. It makes the code smaller and it makes the
code less error prone, as the instruction fields are always
available, so accidental misusage is reduced.
Functionally, this patch doesn't change anything.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
When running the 64-bit Book3s PR code without CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE, we were
doing a few things wrong, most notably access to PACA fields without making
sure that the pointers stay stable accross the access (preempt_disable()).
This patch moves to_svcpu towards a get/put model which allows us to disable
preemption while accessing the shadow vcpu fields in the PACA. That way we
can run preemptible and everyone's happy!
Reported-by: Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Recent Linux versions use the CFAR and PURR SPRs, but don't really care about
their contents (yet). So for now, we can simply return 0 when the guest wants
to read them.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
We have 3 privilege levels: problem state, supervisor state and hypervisor
state. Each of them can access different SPRs, so we need to check on every
SPR if it's accessible in the respective mode.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
The current approach duplicates the spr->bat finding logic and makes it harder
to reuse the actually used variables. So let's move everything down to the spr
handler.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
The SRR0 and SRR1 registers contain cached values of the PC and MSR
respectively. They get written to by the hypervisor when an interrupt
occurs or directly by the kernel. They are also used to tell the rfi(d)
instruction where to jump to.
Because it only gets touched on defined events that, it's very simple to
share with the guest. Hypervisor and guest both have full r/w access.
This patch converts all users of the current field to the shared page.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
The DAR register contains the address a data page fault occured at. This
register behaves pretty much like a simple data storage register that gets
written to on data faults. There is no hypervisor interaction required on
read or write.
This patch converts all users of the current field to the shared page.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
The DSISR register contains information about a data page fault. It is fully
read/write from inside the guest context and we don't need to worry about
interacting based on writes of this register.
This patch converts all users of the current field to the shared page.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
One of the most obvious registers to share with the guest directly is the
MSR. The MSR contains the "interrupts enabled" flag which the guest has to
toggle in critical sections.
So in order to bring the overhead of interrupt en- and disabling down, let's
put msr into the shared page. Keep in mind that even though you can fully read
its contents, writing to it doesn't always update all state. There are a few
safe fields that don't require hypervisor interaction. See the documentation
for a list of MSR bits that are safe to be set from inside the guest.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
When we're on a paired single capable host, we can just always enable
paired singles and expose them to the guest directly.
This approach breaks when multiple VMs run and access PS concurrently,
but this should suffice until we get a proper framework for it in Linux.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Some code we had so far required defines and had code that was completely
Book3S_64 specific. Since we now opened book3s.c to Book3S_32 too, we need
to take care of these pieces.
So let's add some minor code where it makes sense to not go the Book3S_64
code paths and add compat defines on others.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
We already have some inline fuctions we use to access vcpu or svcpu structs,
depending on whether we're on booke or book3s. Since we just put a few more
registers into the svcpu, we also need to make sure the respective callbacks
are available and get used.
So this patch moves direct use of the now in the svcpu struct fields to
inline function calls. While at it, it also moves the definition of those
inline function calls to respective header files for booke and book3s,
greatly improving readability.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
We have quite some code that can be used by Book3S_32 and Book3S_64 alike,
so let's call it "Book3S" instead of "Book3S_64", so we can later on
use it from the 32 bit port too.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Thomas Huth