Commit Graph

61 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eric Paris 75fe2b2639 inotify: do not leak inode marks in inotify_add_watch
inotify_add_watch had a couple of problems.  The biggest being that if
inotify_add_watch was called on the same inode twice (to update or change the
event mask) a refence was taken on the original inode mark by
fsnotify_find_mark_entry but was not being dropped at the end of the
inotify_add_watch call.  Thus if inotify_rm_watch was called although the mark
was removed from the inode, the refcnt wouldn't hit zero and we would leak
memory.

Reported-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
2009-07-21 15:26:26 -04:00
Eric Paris 5549f7cdf8 inotify: drop user watch count when a watch is removed
The inotify rewrite forgot to drop the inotify watch use cound when a watch
was removed.  This means that a single inotify fd can only ever register a
maximum of /proc/sys/fs/max_user_watches even if some of those had been
freed.

Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
2009-07-21 15:26:26 -04:00
Keith Packard bdae997f44 fs/notify/inotify: decrement user inotify count on close
The per-user inotify_devs value is incremented each time a new file is
allocated, but never decremented. This led to inotify_init failing after a
limited number of calls.

Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
2009-07-02 08:23:00 -04:00
Eric Paris 528da3e9e2 inotify: inotify_destroy_mark_entry could get called twice
inotify_destroy_mark_entry could get called twice for the same mark since it
is called directly in inotify_rm_watch and when the mark is being destroyed for
another reason.  As an example assume that the file being watched was just
deleted so inotify_destroy_mark_entry would get called from the path
fsnotify_inoderemove() -> fsnotify_destroy_marks_by_inode() ->
fsnotify_destroy_mark_entry() -> inotify_destroy_mark_entry().  If this
happened at the same time as userspace tried to remove a watch via
inotify_rm_watch we could attempt to remove the mark from the idr twice and
could thus double dec the ref cnt and potentially could be in a use after
free/double free situation.  The fix is to have inotify_rm_watch use the
generic recursive safe fsnotify_destroy_mark_by_entry() so we are sure the
inotify_destroy_mark_entry() function can only be called one.

This patch also renames the function to inotify_ingored_remove_idr() so it is
clear what is actually going on in the function.

Hopefully this fixes:
[   20.342058] idr_remove called for id=20 which is not allocated.
[   20.348000] Pid: 1860, comm: udevd Not tainted 2.6.30-tip #1077
[   20.353933] Call Trace:
[   20.356410]  [<ffffffff811a82b7>] idr_remove+0x115/0x18f
[   20.361737]  [<ffffffff8134259d>] ? _spin_lock+0x6d/0x75
[   20.367061]  [<ffffffff8111640a>] ? inotify_destroy_mark_entry+0xa3/0xcf
[   20.373771]  [<ffffffff8111641e>] inotify_destroy_mark_entry+0xb7/0xcf
[   20.380306]  [<ffffffff81115913>] inotify_freeing_mark+0xe/0x10
[   20.386238]  [<ffffffff8111410d>] fsnotify_destroy_mark_by_entry+0x143/0x170
[   20.393293]  [<ffffffff811163a3>] inotify_destroy_mark_entry+0x3c/0xcf
[   20.399829]  [<ffffffff811164d1>] sys_inotify_rm_watch+0x9b/0xc6
[   20.405850]  [<ffffffff8100bcdb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Peter Ziljlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
2009-06-19 12:42:48 -04:00
Eric Paris 63c882a054 inotify: reimplement inotify using fsnotify
Reimplement inotify_user using fsnotify.  This should be feature for feature
exactly the same as the original inotify_user.  This does not make any changes
to the in kernel inotify feature used by audit.  Those patches (and the eventual
removal of in kernel inotify) will come after the new inotify_user proves to be
working correctly.

Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2009-06-11 14:57:54 -04:00
Wu Fengguang 381a80e6df inotify: use GFP_NOFS in kernel_event() to work around a lockdep false-positive
There is what we believe to be a false positive reported by lockdep.

inotify_inode_queue_event() => take inotify_mutex => kernel_event() =>
kmalloc() => SLOB => alloc_pages_node() => page reclaim => slab reclaim =>
dcache reclaim => inotify_inode_is_dead => take inotify_mutex => deadlock

The plan is to fix this via lockdep annotation, but that is proving to be
quite involved.

The patch flips the allocation over to GFP_NFS to shut the warning up, for
the 2.6.30 release.

Hopefully we will fix this for real in 2.6.31.  I'll queue a patch in -mm
to switch it back to GFP_KERNEL so we don't forget.

  =================================
  [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
  2.6.30-rc2-next-20090417 #203
  ---------------------------------
  inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage.
  kswapd0/380 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
   (&inode->inotify_mutex){+.+.?.}, at: [<ffffffff8112f1b5>] inotify_inode_is_dead+0x35/0xb0
  {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} state was registered at:
    [<ffffffff81079188>] mark_held_locks+0x68/0x90
    [<ffffffff810792a5>] lockdep_trace_alloc+0xf5/0x100
    [<ffffffff810f5261>] __kmalloc_node+0x31/0x1e0
    [<ffffffff81130652>] kernel_event+0xe2/0x190
    [<ffffffff81130826>] inotify_dev_queue_event+0x126/0x230
    [<ffffffff8112f096>] inotify_inode_queue_event+0xc6/0x110
    [<ffffffff8110444d>] vfs_create+0xcd/0x140
    [<ffffffff8110825d>] do_filp_open+0x88d/0xa20
    [<ffffffff810f6b68>] do_sys_open+0x98/0x140
    [<ffffffff810f6c50>] sys_open+0x20/0x30
    [<ffffffff8100c272>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
    [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
  irq event stamp: 690455
  hardirqs last  enabled at (690455): [<ffffffff81564fe4>] _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x80
  hardirqs last disabled at (690454): [<ffffffff81565372>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x32/0xa0
  softirqs last  enabled at (690178): [<ffffffff81052282>] __do_softirq+0x202/0x220
  softirqs last disabled at (690157): [<ffffffff8100d50c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x50

  other info that might help us debug this:
  2 locks held by kswapd0/380:
   #0:  (shrinker_rwsem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff810d0bd7>] shrink_slab+0x37/0x180
   #1:  (&type->s_umount_key#17){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff8110cfbf>] shrink_dcache_memory+0x11f/0x1e0

  stack backtrace:
  Pid: 380, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc2-next-20090417 #203
  Call Trace:
   [<ffffffff810789ef>] print_usage_bug+0x19f/0x200
   [<ffffffff81018bff>] ? save_stack_trace+0x2f/0x50
   [<ffffffff81078f0b>] mark_lock+0x4bb/0x6d0
   [<ffffffff810799e0>] ? check_usage_forwards+0x0/0xc0
   [<ffffffff8107b142>] __lock_acquire+0xc62/0x1ae0
   [<ffffffff810f478c>] ? slob_free+0x10c/0x370
   [<ffffffff8107c0a1>] lock_acquire+0xe1/0x120
   [<ffffffff8112f1b5>] ? inotify_inode_is_dead+0x35/0xb0
   [<ffffffff81562d43>] mutex_lock_nested+0x63/0x420
   [<ffffffff8112f1b5>] ? inotify_inode_is_dead+0x35/0xb0
   [<ffffffff8112f1b5>] ? inotify_inode_is_dead+0x35/0xb0
   [<ffffffff81012fe9>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
   [<ffffffff81077165>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x35/0x1c0
   [<ffffffff8112f1b5>] inotify_inode_is_dead+0x35/0xb0
   [<ffffffff8110c9dc>] dentry_iput+0xbc/0xe0
   [<ffffffff8110cb23>] d_kill+0x33/0x60
   [<ffffffff8110ce23>] __shrink_dcache_sb+0x2d3/0x350
   [<ffffffff8110cffa>] shrink_dcache_memory+0x15a/0x1e0
   [<ffffffff810d0cc5>] shrink_slab+0x125/0x180
   [<ffffffff810d1540>] kswapd+0x560/0x7a0
   [<ffffffff810ce160>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x2c0
   [<ffffffff81065a30>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
   [<ffffffff8107953d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
   [<ffffffff810d0fe0>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x7a0
   [<ffffffff8106555b>] kthread+0x5b/0xa0
   [<ffffffff8100d40a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
   [<ffffffff8100cdd0>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
   [<ffffffff81065500>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
   [<ffffffff8100d400>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20

[eparis@redhat.com: fix audit too]
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-05-06 16:36:09 -07:00
Vegard Nossum 3632dee2f8 inotify: clean up inotify_read and fix locking problems
If userspace supplies an invalid pointer to a read() of an inotify
instance, the inotify device's event list mutex is unlocked twice.
This causes an unbalance which effectively leaves the data structure
unprotected, and we can trigger oopses by accessing the inotify
instance from different tasks concurrently.

The best fix (contributed largely by Linus) is a total rewrite
of the function in question:

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The thing to notice is that:
>
>  - locking is done in just one place, and there is no question about it
>   not having an unlock.
>
>  - that whole double-while(1)-loop thing is gone.
>
>  - use multiple functions to make nesting and error handling sane
>
>  - do error testing after doing the things you always need to do, ie do
>   this:
>
>        mutex_lock(..)
>        ret = function_call();
>        mutex_unlock(..)
>
>        .. test ret here ..
>
>   instead of doing conditional exits with unlocking or freeing.
>
> So if the code is written in this way, it may still be buggy, but at least
> it's not buggy because of subtle "forgot to unlock" or "forgot to free"
> issues.
>
> This _always_ unlocks if it locked, and it always frees if it got a
> non-error kevent.

Cc: John McCutchan <ttb@tentacle.dhs.org>
Cc: Robert Love <rlove@google.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-01-26 10:08:05 -08:00
Heiko Carstens 2e4d0924eb [CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 29
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
2009-01-14 14:15:30 +01:00
Heiko Carstens 938bb9f5e8 [CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 28
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
2009-01-14 14:15:30 +01:00
Michael Kerrisk 4ae8978cf9 inotify: fix type errors in interfaces
The problems lie in the types used for some inotify interfaces, both at the kernel level and at the glibc level. This mail addresses the kernel problem. I will follow up with some suggestions for glibc changes.

For the sys_inotify_rm_watch() interface, the type of the 'wd' argument is
currently 'u32', it should be '__s32' .  That is Robert's suggestion, and
is consistent with the other declarations of watch descriptors in the
kernel source, in particular, the inotify_event structure in
include/linux/inotify.h:

struct inotify_event {
        __s32           wd;             /* watch descriptor */
        __u32           mask;           /* watch mask */
        __u32           cookie;         /* cookie to synchronize two events */
        __u32           len;            /* length (including nulls) of name */
        char            name[0];        /* stub for possible name */
};

The patch makes the changes needed for inotify_rm_watch().

Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com>
Cc: Robert Love <rlove@google.com>
Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-01-05 11:54:29 -05:00
Eric Paris 272eb01485 filesystem notification: create fs/notify to contain all fs notification
Creating a generic filesystem notification interface, fsnotify, which will be
used by inotify, dnotify, and eventually fanotify is really starting to
clutter the fs directory.  This patch simply moves inotify and dnotify into
fs/notify/inotify and fs/notify/dnotify respectively to make both current fs/
and future notification tidier.

Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2008-12-31 18:07:43 -05:00