[BUG]
If we run btrfs with CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS=y, it will
instantly cause kernel panic like:
------
...
assertion failed: 0, file: fs/btrfs/disk-io.c, line: 3853
...
Call Trace:
btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty+0x187/0x1f0 [btrfs]
setup_items_for_insert+0x385/0x650 [btrfs]
__btrfs_drop_extents+0x129a/0x1870 [btrfs]
...
-----
[Cause]
Btrfs will call btrfs_check_leaf() in btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() to check
if the leaf is valid with CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS=y.
However quite some btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() callers(*) don't really
initialize its item data but only initialize its item pointers, leaving
item data uninitialized.
This makes tree-checker catch uninitialized data as error, causing
such panic.
*: These callers include but not limited to
setup_items_for_insert()
btrfs_split_item()
btrfs_expand_item()
[Fix]
Add a new parameter @check_item_data to btrfs_check_leaf().
With @check_item_data set to false, item data check will be skipped and
fallback to old btrfs_check_leaf() behavior.
So we can still get early warning if we screw up item pointers, and
avoid false panic.
Cc: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Lakshmipathi.G <lakshmipathi.g@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We now get a harmless compile-time on 32-bit architectures:
fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c: In function 'check_extent_data_item':
fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c:189:70: error: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 6 has type 'unsigned int' [-Werror=format=]
This changes the format string to use %zu instead of %lu for size_t.
Fixes: c1f6520bf360 ("btrfs: tree-checker: Enhance output for check_extent_data_item")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Output the invalid member name and its bad value, along with its
expected value range or alignment.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Output the bad value and expected good value (or its alignment).
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
[ unindent long strings ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Enhance the output to print:
1) the eason
2) the ad value, if reason is not sufficient
3) good value (range)
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
[ wording, unidented long strings ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Use inline function to replace macro since we don't need
stringification.
(Macro still exists until all callers get updated)
And add more info about the error, and replace EIO with EUCLEAN.
For nr_items error, report if it's too large or too small, and output
the valid value range.
For node block pointer, added a new alignment checker.
For key order, also output the next key to make the problem more
obvious.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
[ wording adjustments, unindented long strings ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It's no doubt the comprehensive tree block checker will become larger,
so moving them into their own files is quite reasonable.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
[ wording adjustments ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Qu Wenruo