replace boilerplate "should we use ->saved_sigmask or ->blocked?"
with calls of obvious inlined helper...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
first fruits of ..._restore_sigmask() helpers: now we can take
boilerplate "signal didn't have a handler, clear RESTORE_SIGMASK
and restore the blocked mask from ->saved_mask" into a common
helper. Open-coded instances switched...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f2 ("signal:
add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked") which
centralises the code for updating current->blocked after successfully
delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code across
architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong, so
using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block
is pending in the shared queue.
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Al Viro