Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jeff Mahoney 6bccf3ab1e btrfs: call functions that always use the same root with fs_info instead
There are many functions that are always called with the same root
argument.  Rather than passing the same root every time, we can
pass an fs_info pointer instead and have the function get the root
pointer itself.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-12-06 16:06:57 +01:00
Jeff Mahoney 5d163e0e68 btrfs: unsplit printed strings
CodingStyle chapter 2:
"[...] never break user-visible strings such as printk messages,
because that breaks the ability to grep for them."

This patch unsplits user-visible strings.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-09-26 18:08:44 +02:00
Filipe Manana f98de9b9c0 Btrfs: make btrfs_search_forward return with nodes unlocked
None of the uses of btrfs_search_forward() need to have the path
nodes (level >= 1) read locked, only the leaf needs to be locked
while the caller processes it. Therefore make it return a path
with all nodes unlocked, except for the leaf.

This change is motivated by the observation that during a file
fsync we repeatdly call btrfs_search_forward() and process the
returned leaf while upper nodes of the returned path (level >= 1)
are read locked, which unnecessarily blocks other tasks that want
to write to the same fs/subvol btree.
Therefore instead of modifying the fsync code to unlock all nodes
with level >= 1 immediately after calling btrfs_search_forward(),
change btrfs_search_forward() to do it, so that it benefits all
callers.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17 13:38:02 -07:00
Frank Holton efe120a067 Btrfs: convert printk to btrfs_ and fix BTRFS prefix
Convert all applicable cases of printk and pr_* to the btrfs_* macros.

Fix all uses of the BTRFS prefix.

Signed-off-by: Frank Holton <fholton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28 13:20:05 -08:00
Filipe David Borba Manana 6174d3cb43 Btrfs: remove unused max_key arg from btrfs_search_forward
It is not used for anything.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11 21:54:57 -05:00
Stefan Behrens 70f8017547 Btrfs: check UUID tree during mount if required
If the filesystem was mounted with an old kernel that was not
aware of the UUID tree, this is detected by looking at the
uuid_tree_generation field of the superblock (similar to how
the free space cache is doing it). If a mismatch is detected
at mount time, a thread is started that does two things:
1. Iterate through the UUID tree, check each entry, delete those
   entries that are not valid anymore (i.e., the subvol does not
   exist anymore or the value changed).
2. Iterate through the root tree, for each found subvolume, add
   the UUID tree entries for the subvolume (if they are not
   already there).

This mechanism is also used to handle and repair errors that
happened during the initial creation and filling of the tree.
The update of the uuid_tree_generation field (which indicates
that the state of the UUID tree is up to date) is blocked until
all create and repair operations are successfully completed.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:15:58 -04:00
Stefan Behrens 07b30a49da Btrfs: introduce a tree for items that map UUIDs to something
Mapping UUIDs to subvolume IDs is an operation with a high effort
today. Today, the algorithm even has quadratic effort (based on the
number of existing subvolumes), which means, that it takes minutes
to send/receive a single subvolume if 10,000 subvolumes exist. But
even linear effort would be too much since it is a waste. And these
data structures to allow mapping UUIDs to subvolume IDs are created
every time a btrfs send/receive instance is started.

It is much more efficient to maintain a searchable persistent data
structure in the filesystem, one that is updated whenever a
subvolume/snapshot is created and deleted, and when the received
subvolume UUID is set by the btrfs-receive tool.

Therefore kernel code is added with this commit that is able to
maintain data structures in the filesystem that allow to quickly
search for a given UUID and to retrieve data that is assigned to
this UUID, like which subvolume ID is related to this UUID.

This commit adds a new tree to hold UUID-to-data mapping items. The
key of the items is the full UUID plus the key type BTRFS_UUID_KEY.
Multiple data blocks can be stored for a given UUID, a type/length/
value scheme is used.

Now follows the lengthy justification, why a new tree was added
instead of using the existing root tree:

The first approach was to not create another tree that holds UUID
items. Instead, the items should just go into the top root tree.
Unfortunately this confused the algorithm to assign the objectid
of subvolumes and snapshots. The reason is that
btrfs_find_free_objectid() calls btrfs_find_highest_objectid() for
the first created subvol or snapshot after mounting a filesystem,
and this function simply searches for the largest used objectid in
the root tree keys to pick the next objectid to assign. Of course,
the UUID keys have always been the ones with the highest offset
value, and the next assigned subvol ID was wastefully huge.

To use any other existing tree did not look proper. To apply a
workaround such as setting the objectid to zero in the UUID item
key and to implement collision handling would either add
limitations (in case of a btrfs_extend_item() approach to handle
the collisions) or a lot of complexity and source code (in case a
key would be looked up that is free of collisions). Adding new code
that introduces limitations is not good, and adding code that is
complex and lengthy for no good reason is also not good. That's the
justification why a completely new tree was introduced.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01 08:15:52 -04:00