The members have been effectively unused since "Btrfs: rework qgroup
accounting" (fcebe4562d), there's no substitute for
assert_qgroups_uptodate so it's removed as well.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Pull btrfs updates from Chris Mason:
"Jeff Mahoney and Dave Sterba have a really nice set of cleanups in
here, and Christoph pitched in corrections/improvements to make btrfs
use proper helpers for bio walking instead of doing it by hand.
There are some key fixes as well, including some long standing bugs
that took forever to track down in btrfs_drop_extents and during
balance"
* 'for-linus-4.10' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: (77 commits)
btrfs: limit async_work allocation and worker func duration
Revert "Btrfs: adjust len of writes if following a preallocated extent"
Btrfs: don't WARN() in btrfs_transaction_abort() for IO errors
btrfs: opencode chunk locking, remove helpers
btrfs: remove root parameter from transaction commit/end routines
btrfs: split btrfs_wait_marked_extents into normal and tree log functions
btrfs: take an fs_info directly when the root is not used otherwise
btrfs: simplify btrfs_wait_cache_io prototype
btrfs: convert extent-tree tracepoints to use fs_info
btrfs: root->fs_info cleanup, access fs_info->delayed_root directly
btrfs: root->fs_info cleanup, add fs_info convenience variables
btrfs: root->fs_info cleanup, update_block_group{,flags}
btrfs: root->fs_info cleanup, lock/unlock_chunks
btrfs: root->fs_info cleanup, btrfs_calc_{trans,trunc}_metadata_size
btrfs: pull node/sector/stripe sizes out of root and into fs_info
btrfs: root->fs_info cleanup, io_ctl_init
btrfs: root->fs_info cleanup, use fs_info->dev_root everywhere
btrfs: struct reada_control.root -> reada_control.fs_info
btrfs: struct btrfsic_state->root should be an fs_info
btrfs: alloc_reserved_file_extent trace point should use extent_root
...
This fixes several interlinked problems with the iterators in the
presence of multiorder entries.
1. radix_tree_iter_next() would only advance by one slot, which would
result in the iterators returning the same entry more than once if
there were sibling entries.
2. radix_tree_next_slot() could return an internal pointer instead of
a user pointer if a tagged multiorder entry was immediately followed by
an entry of lower order.
3. radix_tree_next_slot() expanded to a lot more code than it used to
when multiorder support was compiled in. And I wasn't comfortable with
entry_to_node() being in a header file.
Fixing radix_tree_iter_next() for the presence of sibling entries
necessarily involves examining the contents of the radix tree, so we now
need to pass 'slot' to radix_tree_iter_next(), and we need to change the
calling convention so it is called *before* dropping the lock which
protects the tree. Also rename it to radix_tree_iter_resume(), as some
people thought it was necessary to call radix_tree_iter_next() each time
around the loop.
radix_tree_next_slot() becomes closer to how it looked before multiorder
support was introduced. It only checks to see if the next entry in the
chunk is a sibling entry or a pointer to a node; this should be rare
enough that handling this case out of line is not a performance impact
(and such impact is amortised by the fact that the entry we just
processed was a multiorder entry). Also, radix_tree_next_slot() used to
force a new chunk lookup for untagged entries, which is more expensive
than the out of line sibling entry skipping.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1480369871-5271-55-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.com
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We drop the lock which protects the radix tree, so we must call
radix_tree_iter_next() in order to avoid a modification to the tree
invalidating the iterator state.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1480369871-5271-54-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.com
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We track the node sizes per-root, but they never vary from the values
in the superblock. This patch messes with the 80-column style a bit,
but subsequent patches to factor out root->fs_info into a convenience
variable fix it up again.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This allows the upcoming patchset to push nodesize and sectorsize into
fs_info.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have all these stubs that only exist because they're called from
btrfs_run_sanity_tests, which is a static inside super.c. Let's just
move it all into tests/btrfs-tests.c and only have one stub.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Fix to return a negative error code from the kern_mount() error handling
case instead of 0(ret is set to 0 by register_filesystem), as done
elsewhere in this function.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
self-tests code assumes 4k as the sectorsize and nodesize. This commit
fix hardcoded 4K. Enables the self-tests code to be executed on non-4k
page sized systems (e.g. ppc64).
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Feifei Xu <xufeifei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Pull btrfs updates from Chris Mason:
"We have a good sized cleanup of our internal read ahead code, and the
first series of commits from Chandan to enable PAGE_SIZE > sectorsize
Otherwise, it's a normal series of cleanups and fixes, with many
thanks to Dave Sterba for doing most of the patch wrangling this time"
* 'for-linus-4.6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: (82 commits)
btrfs: make sure we stay inside the bvec during __btrfs_lookup_bio_sums
btrfs: Fix misspellings in comments.
btrfs: Print Warning only if ENOSPC_DEBUG is enabled
btrfs: scrub: silence an uninitialized variable warning
btrfs: move btrfs_compression_type to compression.h
btrfs: rename btrfs_print_info to btrfs_print_mod_info
Btrfs: Show a warning message if one of objectid reaches its highest value
Documentation: btrfs: remove usage specific information
btrfs: use kbasename in btrfsic_mount
Btrfs: do not collect ordered extents when logging that inode exists
Btrfs: fix race when checking if we can skip fsync'ing an inode
Btrfs: fix listxattrs not listing all xattrs packed in the same item
Btrfs: fix deadlock between direct IO reads and buffered writes
Btrfs: fix extent_same allowing destination offset beyond i_size
Btrfs: fix file loss on log replay after renaming a file and fsync
Btrfs: fix unreplayable log after snapshot delete + parent dir fsync
Btrfs: fix lockdep deadlock warning due to dev_replace
btrfs: drop unused argument in btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features
btrfs: add GET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES to the control device ioctls
btrfs: change max_inline default to 2048
...
Even though this is a 'can't happen' situation, use the new
radix_tree_iter_retry() pattern to eliminate a goto.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix btrfs build]
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
There's no reason to do GFP_NOFS in tests, it's not data-heavy and
memory allocation failures would affect only developers or testers.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This tests the operations on the free space tree trying to excercise all
of the main cases for both formats. Between this and xfstests, the free
space tree should have pretty good coverage.
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Mark the dereference as protected by lock. Not doing so triggers
an RCU warning since the radix tree assumed that RCU is in use.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
This exercises the various parts of the new qgroup accounting code. We do some
basic stuff and do some things with the shared refs to make sure all that code
works. I had to add a bunch of infrastructure because I needed to be able to
insert items into a fake tree without having to do all the hard work myself,
hopefully this will be usefull in the future. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
I'm going to be removing hole extents in the near future so I wanted to make a
sanity test for btrfs_get_extent to make sure I don't break anything in the
meantime. This patch just puts btrfs_get_extent through its paces by giving it
a completely unreasonable mapping to look at and make sure it is giving us back
maps that make sense. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
So both Liu and I made huge messes of find_lock_delalloc_range trying to fix
stuff, me first by fixing extent size, then him by fixing something I broke and
then me again telling him to fix it a different way. So this is obviously a
candidate for some testing. This patch adds a pseudo fs so we can allocate fake
inodes for tests that need an inode or pages. Then it addes a bunch of tests to
make sure find_lock_delalloc_range is acting the way it is supposed to. With
this patch and all of our previous patches to find_lock_delalloc_range I am sure
it is working as expected now. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
David Sterba