NO_IRQ has been == 0 on powerpc for just over ten years (since commit
0ebfff1491 ("[POWERPC] Add new interrupt mapping core and change
platforms to use it")). It's also 0 on most other arches.
Although it's fairly harmless, every now and then it causes confusion
when a driver is built on powerpc and another arch which doesn't define
NO_IRQ. There's at least 6 definitions of NO_IRQ in drivers/, at least
some of which are to work around that problem.
So we'd like to remove it. This is fairly trivial in the arch code, we
just convert:
if (irq == NO_IRQ) to if (!irq)
if (irq != NO_IRQ) to if (irq)
irq = NO_IRQ; to irq = 0;
return NO_IRQ; to return 0;
And a few other odd cases as well.
At least for now we keep the #define NO_IRQ, because there is driver
code that uses NO_IRQ and the fixes to remove those will go via other
trees.
Note we also change some occurrences in PPC sound drivers, drivers/ps3,
and drivers/macintosh.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
The struct irq_domain contains a "struct device_node *" field
(of_node) that is almost the only link between the irqdomain
and the device tree infrastructure.
In order to prepare for the removal of that field, convert all
users to use irq_domain_get_of_node() instead.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Cc: Graeme Gregory <graeme@xora.org.uk>
Cc: Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444737105-31573-2-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This fixes a race which can result in the same virtual IRQ number
being assigned to two different MSI interrupts. The most visible
consequence of that is usually a warning and stack trace from the
sysfs code about an attempt to create a duplicate entry in sysfs.
The race happens when one CPU (say CPU 0) is disposing of an MSI
while another CPU (say CPU 1) is setting up an MSI. CPU 0 calls
(for example) pnv_teardown_msi_irqs(), which calls
msi_bitmap_free_hwirqs() to indicate that the MSI (i.e. its
hardware IRQ number) is no longer in use. Then, before CPU 0 gets
to calling irq_dispose_mapping() to free up the virtal IRQ number,
CPU 1 comes in and calls msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs() to allocate an
MSI, and gets the same hardware IRQ number that CPU 0 just freed.
CPU 1 then calls irq_create_mapping() to get a virtual IRQ number,
which sees that there is currently a mapping for that hardware IRQ
number and returns the corresponding virtual IRQ number (which is
the same virtual IRQ number that CPU 0 was using). CPU 0 then
calls irq_dispose_mapping() and frees that virtual IRQ number.
Now, if another CPU comes along and calls irq_create_mapping(), it
is likely to get the virtual IRQ number that was just freed,
resulting in the same virtual IRQ number apparently being used for
two different hardware interrupts.
To fix this race, we just move the call to msi_bitmap_free_hwirqs()
to after the call to irq_dispose_mapping(). Since virq_to_hw()
doesn't work for the virtual IRQ number after irq_dispose_mapping()
has been called, we need to call it before irq_dispose_mapping() and
remember the result for the msi_bitmap_free_hwirqs() call.
The pattern of calling msi_bitmap_free_hwirqs() before
irq_dispose_mapping() appears in 5 places under arch/powerpc, and
appears to have originated in commit 05af7bd2d7 ("[POWERPC] MPIC
U3/U4 MSI backend") from 2007.
Fixes: 05af7bd2d7 ("[POWERPC] MPIC U3/U4 MSI backend")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v2.6.22+
Reported-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Move the PaSemi MPIC msi subsystem to use the pci_controller_ops
structure rather than ppc_md for MSI related PCI controller
operations.
As with fsl_msi, operations are plugged in at the subsys level, after
controller creation. Again, we iterate over all controllers and
populate them with the MSI ops.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
The pasemi MSI code is currently always built when MPIC=y && PCI_MSI=y.
It should not have any effect on other platforms, because it immediately
checks the MPIC's compatible property for "pasemi,pwrficient-openpic".
However it's odd that it's still built even when PASEMI=n. It also
needn't be in sysdev, as it's only used by pasemi. So move it into
platforms/pasemi, whereby it will only be built for PASEMI=y.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Michael Ellerman