A subsequent patch will add additional atomic operations. These new
operations will use the same opcode field as the existing XADD, with
the immediate discriminating different operations.
In preparation, rename the instruction mode BPF_ATOMIC and start
calling the zero immediate BPF_ADD.
This is possible (doesn't break existing valid BPF progs) because the
immediate field is currently reserved MBZ and BPF_ADD is zero.
All uses are removed from the tree but the BPF_XADD definition is
kept around to avoid breaking builds for people including kernel
headers.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-5-jackmanb@google.com
Nearly every user of cgroup helpers does the same sequence of API calls. So
push these into a single helper cgroup_setup_and_join. The cases that do
a bit of extra logic are test_progs which currently uses an env variable
to decide if it needs to setup the cgroup environment or can use an
existingi environment. And then tests that are doing cgroup tests
themselves. We skip these cases for now.
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/159623335418.30208.15807461815525100199.stgit@john-XPS-13-9370
test_cgroup_storage fails on s390 with an assertion failure: packets are
dropped when they shouldn't. The problem is that BPF_DW packet count is
accessed as BPF_W with an offset of 0, which is not correct on
big-endian machines.
Since the point of this test is not to verify narrow loads/stores,
simply use BPF_DW when working with packet counts.
Fixes: 68cfa3ac6b ("selftests/bpf: add a cgroup storage test")
Fixes: 919646d2a3 ("selftests/bpf: extend the storage test to test per-cpu cgroup storage")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
We have some tests that assume create_and_get_cgroup returns -1 on error
which is incorrect (it returns 0 on error). Since fd might be zero in
general case, change create_and_get_cgroup to return -1 on error
and fix the users that assume 0 on error.
Fixes: f269099a7e ("tools/bpf: add a selftest for bpf_get_current_cgroup_id() helper")
Fixes: 7d2c6cfc54 ("bpf: use --cgroup in test_suite if supplied")
v2:
- instead of fixing the uses that assume -1 on error, convert the users
that assume 0 on error (fd might be zero in general case)
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This test extends the cgroup storage test to use per-cpu flavor
of the cgroup storage as well.
The test initializes a per-cpu cgroup storage to some non-zero initial
value (1000), and then simple bumps a per-cpu counter each time
the shared counter is atomically incremented. Then it reads all
per-cpu areas from the userspace side, and checks that the sum
of values adds to the expected sum.
Expected output:
$ ./test_cgroup_storage
test_cgroup_storage:PASS
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
The bpf selftest test_cgroup_storage failed in one of
our production test servers.
# sudo ./test_cgroup_storage
Failed to create map: Operation not permitted
It turns out this is due to insufficient locked memory
with system default 16KB.
Similar to other self tests, let us arm the process
with unlimited locked memory. With this change,
the test passed.
# sudo ./test_cgroup_storage
test_cgroup_storage:PASS
Fixes: 68cfa3ac6b ("selftests/bpf: add a cgroup storage test")
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Implement a test to cover the cgroup storage functionality.
The test implements a bpf program which drops every second packet
by using the cgroup storage as a persistent storage.
The test also use the userspace API to check the data
in the cgroup storage, alter it, and check that the loaded
and attached bpf program sees the update.
Expected output:
$ ./test_cgroup_storage
test_cgroup_storage:PASS
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Brendan Jackman