Commit Graph

145 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Filipe Manana b786f16ac3 Btrfs: send, fix corner case for reference overwrite detection
When the inode given to did_overwrite_ref() matches the current progress
and has a reference that collides with the reference of other inode that
has the same number as the current progress, we were always telling our
caller that the inode's reference was overwritten, which is incorrect
because the other inode might be a new inode (different generation number)
in which case we must return false from did_overwrite_ref() so that its
callers don't use an orphanized path for the inode (as it will never be
orphanized, instead it will be unlinked and the new inode created later).

The following test case for fstests reproduces the issue:

  seq=`basename $0`
  seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
  echo "QA output created by $seq"

  tmp=/tmp/$$
  status=1	# failure is the default!
  trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15

  _cleanup()
  {
      rm -fr $send_files_dir
      rm -f $tmp.*
  }

  # get standard environment, filters and checks
  . ./common/rc
  . ./common/filter

  # real QA test starts here
  _supported_fs btrfs
  _supported_os Linux
  _require_scratch
  _need_to_be_root

  send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq

  rm -f $seqres.full
  rm -fr $send_files_dir
  mkdir $send_files_dir

  _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
  _scratch_mount

  # Create our test file with a single extent of 64K.
  mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
  $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0 64K" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo/bar \
      | _filter_xfs_io

  _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \
      $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1
  _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot $SCRATCH_MNT \
      $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2

  echo "File digest before being replaced:"
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo/bar | _filter_scratch

  # Remove the file and then create a new one in the same location with
  # the same name but with different content. This new file ends up
  # getting the same inode number as the previous one, because that inode
  # number was the highest inode number used by the snapshot's root and
  # therefore when attempting to find the a new inode number for the new
  # file, we end up reusing the same inode number. This happens because
  # currently btrfs uses the highest inode number summed by 1 for the
  # first inode created once a snapshot's root is loaded (done at
  # fs/btrfs/inode-map.c:btrfs_find_free_objectid in the linux kernel
  # tree).
  # Having these two different files in the snapshots with the same inode
  # number (but different generation numbers) caused the btrfs send code
  # to emit an incorrect path for the file when issuing an unlink
  # operation because it failed to realize they were different files.
  rm -f $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo/bar
  $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0 96K" \
      $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo/bar | _filter_xfs_io

  _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 \
      $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro

  _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $send_files_dir/1.snap
  _run_btrfs_util_prog send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 \
      $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro -f $send_files_dir/2.snap

  echo "File digest in the original filesystem after being replaced:"
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro/foo/bar | _filter_scratch

  # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving both send streams and verify
  # we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had.
  _scratch_unmount
  _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
  _scratch_mount

  _run_btrfs_util_prog receive -vv $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap
  _run_btrfs_util_prog receive -vv $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/2.snap

  echo "File digest in the new filesystem:"
  # Must match the digest from the new file.
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro/foo/bar | _filter_scratch

  status=0
  exit

Reported-by: Martin Raiber <martin@urbackup.org>
Fixes: 8b191a6849 ("Btrfs: incremental send, check if orphanized dir inode needs delayed rename")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-10-05 16:56:27 -07:00
Josef Bacik 37b8d27de5 Btrfs: use received_uuid of parent during send
Neil Horman pointed out a problem where if he did something like this

receive A
snap A B
change B
send -p A B

and then on another box do

recieve A
receive B

the receive B would fail because we use the UUID of A for the clone sources for
B.  This makes sense most of the time because normally you are sending from the
original sources, not a received source.  However when you use a recieved subvol
its UUID is going to be something completely different, so if you then try to
receive the diff on a different volume it won't find the UUID because the new A
will be something else.  The only constant is the received uuid.  So instead
check to see if we have received_uuid set on the root, and if so use that as the
clone source, as btrfs receive looks for matches either in received_uuid or
uuid.  Thanks,

Reported-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-06-12 13:20:38 -07:00
Chris Mason 1ab818b137 Merge branch 'send_fixes_4.2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/fdmanana/linux into for-linus-4.2 2015-06-10 07:02:41 -07:00
Filipe Manana 619d8c4ef7 Btrfs: incremental send, fix clone operations for compressed extents
Marc reported a problem where the receiving end of an incremental send
was performing clone operations that failed with -EINVAL. This happened
because, unlike for uncompressed extents, we were not checking if the
source clone offset and length, after summing the data offset, falls
within the source file's boundaries.

So make sure we do such checks when attempting to issue clone operations
for compressed extents.

Problem reproducible with the following steps:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
  $ mount -o compress /dev/sdb /mnt
  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
  $ mount -o compress /dev/sdc /mnt2

  # Create the file with a single extent of 128K. This creates a metadata file
  # extent item with a data start offset of 0 and a logical length of 128K.
  $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 64K 128K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo

  # Now rewrite the range 64K to 112K of our file. This will make the inode's
  # metadata continue to point to the 128K extent we created before, but now
  # with an extent item that points to the extent with a data start offset of
  # 112K and a logical length of 16K.
  # That metadata file extent item is associated with the logical file offset
  # at 176K and covers the logical file range 176K to 192K.
  $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 64K 112K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo

  # Now rewrite the range 180K to 12K. This will make the inode's metadata
  # continue to point the the 128K extent we created earlier, with a single
  # extent item that points to it with a start offset of 112K and a logical
  # length of 4K.
  # That metadata file extent item is associated with the logical file offset
  # at 176K and covers the logical file range 176K to 180K.
  $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 180K 12K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo

  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1

  $ touch /mnt/bar
  # Calls the btrfs clone ioctl.
  $ ~/xfstests/src/cloner -s $((176 * 1024)) -d $((176 * 1024)) \
    -l $((4 * 1024)) /mnt/foo /mnt/bar

  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2

  $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2
  At subvol /mnt/snap1
  At subvol snap1

  $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive /mnt2
  At subvol /mnt/snap2
  At snapshot snap2
  ERROR: failed to clone extents to bar
  Invalid argument

A test case for fstests follows soon.

Reported-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
Tested-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Tested-by: Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) <jan.steffens@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-06-02 19:34:35 -07:00
Filipe Manana 8b191a6849 Btrfs: incremental send, check if orphanized dir inode needs delayed rename
If a directory inode is orphanized, because some inode previously
processed has a new name that collides with the old name of the current
inode, we need to check if it needs its rename operation delayed too,
as its ancestor-descendent relationship with some other inode might
have been reversed between the parent and send snapshots and therefore
its rename operation needs to happen after that other inode is renamed.

For example, for the following reproducer where this is needed (provided
by Robbie Ko):

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
  $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
  $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2

  $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/n1/n2
  $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4
  $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t6/t7
  $ mkdir /mnt/data/t5
  $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7
  $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4/t2
  $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4
  $ mkdir /mnt/data/t3
  $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2
  $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7
  $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4
  $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5
  $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6
  $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2
  $ mv /mnt/data/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7

  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1

  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n1 /mnt/data/n4
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2 /mnt/data/n4/n1
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7/t3 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t6
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t3
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2

  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2

  $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2
  $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive /mnt2
  ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory

Where the parent snapshot directory hierarchy is the following:

  .                                                        (ino 256)
  |-- data/                                                (ino 257)
        |-- n4/                                            (ino 260)
             |-- t2/                                       (ino 265)
                  |-- t7/                                  (ino 264)
                       |-- t4/                             (ino 266)
                            |-- t5/                        (ino 263)
                                 |-- t6/                   (ino 261)
                                      |-- n1/              (ino 258)
                                      |-- n2/              (ino 259)
                                           |-- t7/         (ino 262)
                                                |-- t3/    (ino 267)

And the send snapshot's directory hierarchy is the following:

  .                                                        (ino 256)
  |-- data/                                                (ino 257)
        |-- n4/                                            (ino 260)
             |-- n1/                                       (ino 258)
                  |-- t2/                                  (ino 265)
                       |-- n2/                             (ino 259)
                       |-- t3/                             (ino 267)
                       |    |-- t7                         (ino 264)
                       |
                       |-- t6/                             (ino 261)
                       |    |-- t4/                        (ino 266)
                       |         |-- t5/                   (ino 263)
                       |
                       |-- t7/                             (ino 262)

While processing inode 262 we orphanize inode 264 and later attempt
to rename inode 264 to its new name/location, which resulted in building
an incorrect destination path string for the rename operation with the
value "data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7/t3/t7". This rename operation must
have been done only after inode 267 is processed and renamed, as the
ancestor-descendent relationship between inodes 264 and 267 was reversed
between both snapshots, because otherwise it results in an infinite loop
when building the path string for inode 264 when we are processing an
inode with a number larger than 264. That loop is the following:

  start inode 264, send progress of 265 for example
  parent of 264 -> 267
  parent of 267 -> 262
  parent of 262 -> 259
  parent of 259 -> 261
  parent of 261 -> 263
  parent of 263 -> 266
  parent of 266 -> 264
    |--> back to first iteration while current path string length
         is <= PATH_MAX, and fail with -ENOMEM otherwise

So fix this by making the check if we need to delay a directory rename
regardless of the current inode having been orphanized or not.

A test case for fstests follows soon.

Thanks to Robbie Ko for providing a reproducer for this problem.

Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-06-03 03:10:40 +01:00
Filipe Manana 80aa602756 Btrfs: incremental send, don't delay directory renames unnecessarily
Even though we delay the rename of directories when they become
descendents of other directories that were also renamed in the send
root to prevent infinite path build loops, we were doing it in cases
where this was not needed and was actually harmful resulting in
infinite path build loops as we ended up with a circular dependency
of delayed directory renames.

Consider the following reproducer:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
  $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
  $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2

  $ mkdir /mnt/data
  $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1
  $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2
  $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4
  $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1
  $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2
  $ mkdir /mnt/data/t6
  $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7
  $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t5/t7
  $ mkdir /mnt/data/t2
  $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4
  $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t1/t3
  $ mkdir /mnt/data/p1
  $ mv /mnt/data/t1 /mnt/data/p1
  $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/p1/p2
  $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/p1/p2/t1
  $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t5
  $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2
  $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/t7
  $ mv /mnt/data/t2 /mnt/data/n4/t1
  $ mv /mnt/data/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1
  $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1
  $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t5
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t1
  $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/n1

  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1

  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/t1
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/t7
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/t5
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7

  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2

  $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2
  $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive -vv /mnt2
  ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory

This reproducer resulted in an infinite path build loop when building the
path for inode 266 because the following circular dependency of delayed
directory renames was created:

   ino 272 <- ino 261 <- ino 259 <- ino 268 <- ino 267 <- ino 261

Where the notation "X <- Y" means the rename of inode X is delayed by the
rename of inode Y (X will be renamed after Y is renamed). This resulted
in an infinite path build loop of inode 266 because that inode has inode
261 as an ancestor in the send root and inode 261 is in the circular
dependency of delayed renames listed above.

Fix this by not delaying the rename of a directory inode if an ancestor of
the inode in the send root, which has a delayed rename operation, is not
also a descendent of the inode in the parent root.

Thanks to Robbie Ko for sending the reproducer example.
A test case for xfstests follows soon.

Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-06-03 03:10:20 +01:00
Filipe Manana 5f806c3ae2 Btrfs: incremental send, remove dead code
The logic to detect path loops when attempting to apply a pending
directory rename, introduced in commit
f959492fc1 (Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames)
is no longer needed, and the respective fstests test case for that commit,
btrfs/045, now passes without this code (as well as all the other test
cases for send/receive).

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-03-26 17:55:52 -07:00
Filipe Manana 8996a48c0a Btrfs: incremental send, clear name from cache after orphanization
If a directory's reference ends up being orphanized, because the inode
currently being processed has a new path that matches that directory's
path, make sure we evict the name of the directory from the name cache.
This is because there might be descendent inodes (either directories or
regular files) that will be orphanized later too, and therefore the
orphan name of the ancestor must be used, otherwise we send issue rename
operations with a wrong path in the send stream.

Reproducer:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
  $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt

  $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2
  $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4
  $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/p1/p2

  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1

  $ mv /mnt/data/p1/p2 /mnt/data
  $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/p1
  $ mv /mnt/data/p2 /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1
  $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/p1
  $ mv /mnt/data/p1 /mnt/data/n4
  $ mv /mnt/data/n4/p1/n2/p1 /mnt/data

  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2

  $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send
  $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
  $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2
  $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send
  $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send
  ERROR: rename data/p1/p2 -> data/n4/p1/p2 failed. no such file or directory

Directories data/p1 (inode 263) and data/p1/p2 (inode 264) in the parent
snapshot are both orphanized during the incremental send, and as soon as
data/p1 is orphanized, we must make sure that when orphanizing data/p1/p2
we use a source path of o263-6-o/p2 for the rename operation instead of
the old path data/p1/p2 (the one before the orphanization of inode 263).

A test case for xfstests follows soon.

Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-03-26 17:55:51 -07:00
Filipe Manana 2f1f465ae6 Btrfs: send, don't leave without decrementing clone root's send_progress
If the clone root was not readonly or the dead flag was set on it, we were
leaving without decrementing the root's send_progress counter (and before
we just incremented it). If a concurrent snapshot deletion was in progress
and ended up being aborted, it would be impossible to later attempt to
delete again the snapshot, since the root's send_in_progress counter could
never go back to 0.

We were also setting clone_sources_to_rollback to i + 1 too early - if we
bailed out because the clone root we got is not readonly or flagged as dead
we ended up later derreferencing a null pointer because we didn't assign
the clone root to sctx->clone_roots[i].root:

		for (i = 0; sctx && i < clone_sources_to_rollback; i++)
			btrfs_root_dec_send_in_progress(
					sctx->clone_roots[i].root);

So just don't increment the send_in_progress counter if the root is readonly
or flagged as dead.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-03-26 17:55:51 -07:00
Filipe Manana 5cc2b17e80 Btrfs: send, add missing check for dead clone root
After we locked the root's root item, a concurrent snapshot deletion
call might have set the dead flag on it. So check if the dead flag
is set and abort if it is, just like we do for the parent root.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-03-26 17:55:51 -07:00
Filipe Manana 84471e2429 Btrfs: incremental send, don't rename a directory too soon
There's one more case where we can't issue a rename operation for a
directory as soon as we process it. We used to delay directory renames
only if they have some ancestor directory with a higher inode number
that got renamed too, but there's another case where we need to delay
the rename too - when a directory A is renamed to the old name of a
directory B but that directory B has its rename delayed because it
has now (in the send root) an ancestor with a higher inode number that
was renamed. If we don't delay the directory rename in this case, the
receiving end of the send stream will attempt to rename A to the old
name of B before B got renamed to its new name, which results in a
"directory not empty" error. So fix this by delaying directory renames
for this case too.

Steps to reproduce:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
  $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt

  $ mkdir /mnt/a
  $ mkdir /mnt/b
  $ mkdir /mnt/c
  $ touch /mnt/a/file

  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1

  $ mv /mnt/c /mnt/x
  $ mv /mnt/a /mnt/x/y
  $ mv /mnt/b /mnt/a

  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2

  $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send
  $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
  $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2
  $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send
  $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send
  ERROR: rename b -> a failed. Directory not empty

A test case for xfstests follows soon.

Reported-by: Ames Cornish <ames@cornishes.net>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-03-02 14:04:45 -08:00
David Sterba a937b9791e btrfs: kill btrfs_inode_*time helpers
They just opencode taking address of the timespec member.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-02-02 18:39:07 -08:00
Filipe Manana e5fa8f865b Btrfs: ensure send always works on roots without orphans
Move the logic from the snapshot creation ioctl into send. This avoids
doing the transaction commit if send isn't used, and ensures that if
a crash/reboot happens after the transaction commit that created the
snapshot and before the transaction commit that switched the commit
root, send will not get a commit root that differs from the main root
(that has orphan items).

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-11-25 07:41:23 -08:00
Chris Mason bbf65cf0b5 Merge branch 'cleanup/misc-for-3.18' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linus
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Conflicts:
	fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
2014-10-04 09:56:45 -07:00
Filipe Manana bf8e8ca6fd Btrfs: send, don't delay dir move if there's a new parent inode
If between two snapshots we rename an existing directory named X to Y and
make it a child (direct or not) of a new inode named X, we were delaying
the move/rename of the former directory unnecessarily, which would result
in attempting to rename the new directory from its orphan name to name X
prematurely.

Minimal reproducer:

    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/vdd
    $ mount /dev/vdd /mnt
    $ mkdir -p /mnt/merlin/RC/OSD/Source

    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1

    $ mkdir /mnt/OSD
    $ mv /mnt/merlin/RC/OSD /mnt/OSD/OSD-Plane_788
    $ mv /mnt/OSD /mnt/merlin/RC

    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2

    $ btrfs send /mnt/mysnap1 -f /tmp/1.snap
    $ btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2 -f /tmp/2.snap

    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/vdc
    $ mount /dev/vdc /mnt2

    $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.snap
    $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.snap

The second receive (from an incremental send) failed with the following
error message: "rename o261-7-0 -> merlin/RC/OSD failed".
This is a regression introduced in the 3.16 kernel.

A test case for xfstests follows.

Reported-by: Marc Merlin <marc@merlins.org>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-10-03 16:14:59 -07:00
David Sterba 2755a0de64 btrfs: hide typecast to definition of BTRFS_SEND_TRANS_STUB
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-02 17:30:31 +02:00
Filipe Manana 4395e0c4da Btrfs: send, lower mem requirements for processing xattrs
Maximum xattr size can be up to nearly the leaf size. For an fs with a
leaf size larger than the page size, using kmalloc requires allocating
multiple pages that are contiguous, which might not be possible if
there's heavy memory fragmentation. Therefore fallback to vmalloc if
we fail to allocate with kmalloc. Also start with a smaller buffer size,
since xattr values typically are smaller than a page.

Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17 13:38:16 -07:00
Fabian Frederick d447d0da44 Btrfs: fix sparse warning
Fix the following sparse warning:
fs/btrfs/send.c:518:51: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
fs/btrfs/send.c:518:51:    expected char const [noderef] <asn:1>*<noident>
fs/btrfs/send.c:518:51:    got char *

We can safely use (const char __user *) with set_fs(KERNEL_DS)

__force added to avoid sparse-all warning:
fs/btrfs/send.c:518:40: warning: cast adds address space to expression (<asn:1>)

Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@zabbo.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17 13:37:35 -07:00
Filipe Manana 7e3ae33efa Btrfs: send, use the right limits for xattr names and values
We were limiting the sum of the xattr name and value lengths to PATH_MAX,
which is not correct, specially on filesystems created with btrfs-progs
v3.12 or higher, where the default leaf size is max(16384, PAGE_SIZE), or
systems with page sizes larger than 4096 bytes.

Xattrs have their own specific maximum name and value lengths, which depend
on the leaf size, therefore use these limits to be able to send xattrs with
sizes larger than PATH_MAX.

A test case for xfstests follows.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09 17:21:00 -07:00
Filipe Manana 1af56070e3 Btrfs: send, don't error in the presence of subvols/snapshots
If we are doing an incremental send and the base snapshot has a
directory with name X that doesn't exist anymore in the second
snapshot and a new subvolume/snapshot exists in the second snapshot
that has the same name as the directory (name X), the incremental
send would fail with -ENOENT error. This is because it attempts
to lookup for an inode with a number matching the objectid of a
root, which doesn't exist.

Steps to reproduce:

    mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
    mount /dev/sdd /mnt

    mkdir /mnt/testdir
    btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1

    rmdir /mnt/testdir
    btrfs subvolume create /mnt/testdir
    btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2

    btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2 -f /tmp/send.data

A test case for xfstests follows.

Reported-by: Robert White <rwhite@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09 17:20:59 -07:00
David Sterba 351fd35321 btrfs: remove stale newlines from log messages
I've noticed an extra line after "use no compression", but search
revealed much more in messages of more critical levels and rare errors.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09 17:20:53 -07:00
Filipe Manana f959492fc1 Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames
This is a continuation of the previous changes titled:

   Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename
   Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename

There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was
previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than
ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it
doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs
to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number
than ours).

So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than
ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or:

1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send
   root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered);
2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and
   exists only in the send root).

Reproducer for case 1)

    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
    $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt

    $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b
    $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f
    $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/x
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/y

    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
    $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send

    $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y
    $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e
    $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d
    $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c

    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
    $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

Simple reproducer for case 2)

    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
    $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt

    $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/c
    $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/e

    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
    $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send

    $ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/h
    $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2
    $ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2

    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
    $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

Another simple reproducer for case 2)

    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
    $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt

    $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/c
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e

    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
    $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send

    $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g
    $ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2
    $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2
    $ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2

    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
    $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

More complex reproducer for case 2)

    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
    $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt

    $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b
    $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f
    $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/x
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/y

    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
    $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send

    $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y
    $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e
    $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d
    $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c

    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
    $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building
path strings.

While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect
when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several
specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple
detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop
detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as
the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed).

Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09 17:20:40 -07:00
Filipe Manana a10c40766c Btrfs: send, remove dead code from __get_cur_name_and_parent
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09 17:20:39 -07:00
Filipe Manana c992ec94f2 Btrfs: send, account for orphan directories when building path strings
If we have directories with a pending move/rename operation, we must take into
account any orphan directories that got created before executing the pending
move/rename. Those orphan directories are directories with an inode number higher
then the current send progress and that don't exist in the parent snapshot, they
are created before current progress reaches their inode number, with a generated
name of the form oN-M-I and at the root of the filesystem tree, and later when
progress matches their inode number, moved/renamed to their final location.

Reproducer:

          $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
          $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt

          $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d
          $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e
          $ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/b/e/CC
          $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e/CC/d/f
	  $ mkdir /mnt/a/g

          $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
          $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send

          $ mkdir /mnt/a/g/h
	  $ mv /mnt/a/b/e /mnt/a/g/h/EE
          $ mv /mnt/a/g/h/EE/CC/d /mnt/a/g/h/EE/DD

          $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
          $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

The second receive command failed with the following error:

    ERROR: rename a/b/e/CC/d -> o264-7-0/EE/DD failed. No such file or directory

A test case for xfstests follows soon.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09 17:20:38 -07:00
Filipe Manana b46ab97bcd Btrfs: send, avoid unnecessary inode item lookup in the btree
Regardless of whether the caller is interested or not in knowing the inode's
generation (dir_gen != NULL), get_first_ref always does a btree lookup to get
the inode item. Avoid this useless lookup if dir_gen parameter is NULL (which
is in some cases).

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09 17:20:37 -07:00
David Sterba 521e0546c9 btrfs: protect snapshots from deleting during send
The patch "Btrfs: fix protection between send and root deletion"
(18f687d538) does not actually prevent to delete the snapshot
and just takes care during background cleaning, but this seems rather
user unfriendly, this patch implements the idea presented in

http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg30813.html

- add an internal root_item flag to denote a dead root
- check if the send_in_progress is set and refuse to delete, otherwise
  set the flag and proceed
- check the flag in send similar to the btrfs_root_readonly checks, for
  all involved roots

The root lookup in send via btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name will check if the
root is really dead or not. If it is, ENOENT, aborted send. If it's
alive, it's protected by send_in_progress, send can continue.

CC: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
CC: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09 17:20:31 -07:00
Filipe Manana 01a9a8a9e2 Btrfs: send, fix corrupted path strings for long paths
If a path has more than 230 characters, we allocate a new buffer to
use for the path, but we were forgotting to copy the contents of the
previous buffer into the new one, which has random content from the
kmalloc call.

Test:

    mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
    mount /dev/sdd /mnt

    TEST_PATH="/mnt/fdmanana/.config/google-chrome-mysetup/Default/Pepper_Data/Shockwave_Flash/WritableRoot/#SharedObjects/JSHJ4ZKN/s.wsj.net/[[IMPORT]]/players.edgesuite.net/flash/plugins/osmf/advanced-streaming-plugin/v2.7/osmf1.6/Ak#"
    mkdir -p $TEST_PATH
    echo "hello world" > $TEST_PATH/amaiAdvancedStreamingPlugin.txt

    btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1
    btrfs send /mnt/mysnap1 -f /tmp/1.snap

A test for xfstests follows.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Cc: Marc Merlin <marc@merlins.org>
Tested-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-06 12:00:46 -07:00
Filipe Manana 51a60253a5 Btrfs: send, fix incorrect ref access when using extrefs
When running send, if an inode only has extended reference items
associated to it and no regular references, send.c:get_first_ref()
was incorrectly assuming the reference it found was of type
BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY due to use of the wrong key variable.
This caused weird behaviour when using the found item has a regular
reference, such as weird path string, and occasionally (when lucky)
a crash:

[  190.600652] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[  190.600994] Modules linked in: btrfs xor raid6_pq binfmt_misc nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd fscache sunrpc psmouse serio_raw evbug pcspkr i2c_piix4 e1000 floppy
[  190.602565] CPU: 2 PID: 14520 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 3.13.0-fdm-btrfs-next-26+ #1
[  190.602728] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
[  190.602868] task: ffff8800d447c920 ti: ffff8801fa79e000 task.ti: ffff8801fa79e000
[  190.603030] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff813266b4>]  [<ffffffff813266b4>] memcpy+0x54/0x110
[  190.603262] RSP: 0018:ffff8801fa79f880  EFLAGS: 00010202
[  190.603395] RAX: ffff8800d4326e3f RBX: 000000000000036a RCX: ffff880000000000
[  190.603553] RDX: 000000000000032a RSI: ffe708844042936a RDI: ffff8800d43271a9
[  190.603710] RBP: ffff8801fa79f8c8 R08: 00000000003a4ef0 R09: 0000000000000000
[  190.603867] R10: 793a4ef09f000000 R11: 9f0000000053726f R12: ffff8800d43271a9
[  190.604020] R13: 0000160000000000 R14: ffff8802110134f0 R15: 000000000000036a
[  190.604020] FS:  00007fb423d09b80(0000) GS:ffff880216200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  190.604020] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[  190.604020] CR2: 00007fb4229d4b78 CR3: 00000001f5d76000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[  190.604020] Stack:
[  190.604020]  ffffffffa01f4d49 ffff8801fa79f8f0 00000000000009f9 ffff8801fa79f8c8
[  190.604020]  00000000000009f9 ffff880211013260 000000000000f971 ffff88021147dba8
[  190.604020]  00000000000009f9 ffff8801fa79f918 ffffffffa02367f5 ffff8801fa79f928
[  190.604020] Call Trace:
[  190.604020]  [<ffffffffa01f4d49>] ? read_extent_buffer+0xb9/0x120 [btrfs]
[  190.604020]  [<ffffffffa02367f5>] fs_path_add_from_extent_buffer+0x45/0x60 [btrfs]
[  190.604020]  [<ffffffffa0238806>] get_first_ref+0x1f6/0x210 [btrfs]
[  190.604020]  [<ffffffffa0238994>] __get_cur_name_and_parent+0x174/0x3a0 [btrfs]
[  190.604020]  [<ffffffff8118df3d>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x11d/0x1e0
[  190.604020]  [<ffffffffa0236674>] ? fs_path_alloc+0x24/0x60 [btrfs]
[  190.604020]  [<ffffffffa0238c91>] get_cur_path+0xd1/0x240 [btrfs]
(...)

Steps to reproduce (either crash or some weirdness like an odd path string):

    mkfs.btrfs -f -O extref /dev/sdd
    mount /dev/sdd /mnt

    mkdir /mnt/testdir
    touch /mnt/testdir/foobar

    for i in `seq 1 2550`; do
        ln /mnt/testdir/foobar /mnt/testdir/foobar_link_`printf "%04d" $i`
    done

    ln /mnt/testdir/foobar /mnt/testdir/final_foobar_name

    rm -f /mnt/testdir/foobar
    for i in `seq 1 2550`; do
        rm -f /mnt/testdir/foobar_link_`printf "%04d" $i`
    done

    btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap
    btrfs send /mnt/mysnap -f /tmp/mysnap.send

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
2014-05-20 10:18:26 -07:00
Chris Mason cfd4a535b6 Btrfs: limit the path size in send to PATH_MAX
fs_path_ensure_buf is used to make sure our path buffers for
send are big enough for the path names as we construct them.
The buffer size is limited to 32K by the length field in
the struct.

But bugs in the path construction can end up trying to build
a huge buffer, and we'll do invalid memmmoves when the
buffer length field wraps.

This patch is step one, preventing the overflows.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-26 05:02:03 -07:00
Filipe Manana c715e155c9 Btrfs: send, build path string only once in send_hole
There's no point building the path string in each iteration of the
send_hole loop, as it produces always the same string.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07 09:08:46 -07:00
Filipe Manana 766b5e5ae7 Btrfs: send, fix data corruption due to incorrect hole detection
During an incremental send, when we finish processing an inode (corresponding to
a regular file) we would assume the gap between the end of the last processed file
extent and the file's size corresponded to a file hole, and therefore incorrectly
send a bunch of zero bytes to overwrite that region in the file.

This affects only kernel 3.14.

Reproducer:

    mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
    mount /dev/sdc /mnt

    xfs_io -f -c "falloc -k 0 268435456" /mnt/foo

    btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap0

    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x01 -b 9216 16190218 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x02 -b 1121 198720104 1121" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x05 -b 9216 107887439 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x06 -b 9216 225520207 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x07 -b 67584 102138300 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x08 -b 7000 94897484 7000" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x09 -b 113664 245083212 113664" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x10 -b 123 17937788 123" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x11 -b 39936 229573311 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x12 -b 67584 174792222 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x13 -b 9216 249253213 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x16 -b 67584 150046083 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x17 -b 39936 118246040 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x18 -b 67584 215965442 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x19 -b 33792 97096725 33792" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x20 -b 125952 166300596 125952" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x21 -b 123 1078957 123" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x25 -b 9216 212044492 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x26 -b 7000 265037146 7000" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x27 -b 42757 215922685 42757" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x28 -b 7000 69865411 7000" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x29 -b 67584 67948958 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x30 -b 39936 266967019 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x31 -b 1121 19582453 1121" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x32 -b 17408 257710255 17408" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x33 -b 39936 3895518 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x34 -b 125952 12045847 125952" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x35 -b 17408 19156379 17408" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x36 -b 39936 50160066 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x37 -b 113664 9549793 113664" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x38 -b 105472 94391506 105472" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x39 -b 23552 143632863 23552" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x40 -b 39936 241283845 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x41 -b 113664 199937606 113664" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x42 -b 67584 67380093 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x43 -b 67584 26793129 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x44 -b 39936 14421913 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x45 -b 123 253097405 123" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x46 -b 1121 128233424 1121" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x47 -b 105472 91577959 105472" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x48 -b 1121 7245381 1121" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x49 -b 113664 182414694 113664" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x50 -b 9216 32750608 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x51 -b 67584 266546049 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x52 -b 67584 87969398 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x53 -b 9216 260848797 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x54 -b 39936 119461243 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x55 -b 7000 200178693 7000" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x56 -b 9216 243316029 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x57 -b 7000 209658229 7000" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x58 -b 101376 179745192 101376" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x59 -b 9216 64012300 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x60 -b 125952 181705139 125952" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x61 -b 23552 235737348 23552" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x62 -b 113664 106021355 113664" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x63 -b 67584 135753552 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x64 -b 23552 95730888 23552" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x65 -b 11 17311415 11" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x66 -b 33792 120695553 33792" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x67 -b 9216 17164631 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x68 -b 9216 136065853 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x69 -b 67584 37752198 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x70 -b 101376 189717473 101376" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x71 -b 7000 227463698 7000" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x72 -b 9216 12655137 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x73 -b 7000 7488866 7000" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x74 -b 113664 87813649 113664" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x75 -b 33792 25802183 33792" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x76 -b 39936 93524024 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x77 -b 33792 113336388 33792" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x78 -b 105472 184955320 105472" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x79 -b 101376 225691598 101376" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x80 -b 23552 77023155 23552" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x81 -b 11 201888192 11" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x82 -b 11 115332492 11" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x83 -b 67584 230278015 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x84 -b 11 120589073 11" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x85 -b 125952 202207819 125952" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x86 -b 113664 86672080 113664" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x87 -b 17408 208459603 17408" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x88 -b 7000 73372211 7000" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x89 -b 7000 42252122 7000" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x90 -b 23552 46784881 23552" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x91 -b 101376 63172351 101376" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x92 -b 23552 59341931 23552" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x93 -b 39936 239599283 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x94 -b 67584 175643105 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x97 -b 23552 105534880 23552" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x98 -b 113664 8236844 113664" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x99 -b 125952 144489686 125952" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa0 -b 7000 73273112 7000" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa1 -b 125952 194580243 125952" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa2 -b 123 56296779 123" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa3 -b 11 233066845 11" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa4 -b 39936 197727090 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa5 -b 101376 53579812 101376" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa6 -b 9216 85669738 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa7 -b 125952 21266322 125952" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa8 -b 23552 125726568 23552" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa9 -b 9216 18423680 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xb0 -b 1121 165901483 1121" /mnt/foo

    btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1

    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xff -b 10 16190218 10" /mnt/foo

    btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2

    md5sum /mnt/foo          # returns 79e53f1466bfc09fd82b450689e6119e
    md5sum /mnt/mysnap2/foo  # returns 79e53f1466bfc09fd82b450689e6119e too

    btrfs send /mnt/mysnap1 -f /tmp/1.snap
    btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2 -f /tmp/2.snap

    mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
    mount /dev/sdc /mnt

    btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/1.snap
    btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/2.snap

    md5sum /mnt/mysnap2/foo  # returns 2bb414c5155767cedccd7063e51beabd !!

A testcase for xfstests follows soon too.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07 09:08:45 -07:00
Josef Bacik 3f8a18cc53 Btrfs: hold the commit_root_sem when getting the commit root during send
We currently rely too heavily on roots being read-only to save us from just
accessing root->commit_root.  We can easily balance blocks out from underneath a
read only root, so to save us from getting screwed make sure we only access
root->commit_root under the commit root sem.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07 09:08:39 -07:00
Josef Bacik 9e351cc862 Btrfs: remove transaction from send
Lets try this again.  We can deadlock the box if we send on a box and try to
write onto the same fs with the app that is trying to listen to the send pipe.
This is because the writer could get stuck waiting for a transaction commit
which is being blocked by the send.  So fix this by making sure looking at the
commit roots is always going to be consistent.  We do this by keeping track of
which roots need to have their commit roots swapped during commit, and then
taking the commit_root_sem and swapping them all at once.  Then make sure we
take a read lock on the commit_root_sem in cases where we search the commit root
to make sure we're always looking at a consistent view of the commit roots.
Previously we had problems with this because we would swap a fs tree commit root
and then swap the extent tree commit root independently which would cause the
backref walking code to screw up sometimes.  With this patch we no longer
deadlock and pass all the weird send/receive corner cases.  Thanks,

Reportedy-by: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-06 17:39:30 -07:00
Josef Bacik a26e8c9f75 Btrfs: don't clear uptodate if the eb is under IO
So I have an awful exercise script that will run snapshot, balance and
send/receive in parallel.  This sometimes would crash spectacularly and when it
came back up the fs would be completely hosed.  Turns out this is because of a
bad interaction of balance and send/receive.  Send will hold onto its entire
path for the whole send, but its blocks could get relocated out from underneath
it, and because it doesn't old tree locks theres nothing to keep this from
happening.  So it will go to read in a slot with an old transid, and we could
have re-allocated this block for something else and it could have a completely
different transid.  But because we think it is invalid we clear uptodate and
re-read in the block.  If we do this before we actually write out the new block
we could write back stale data to the fs, and boom we're screwed.

Now we definitely need to fix this disconnect between send and balance, but we
really really need to not allow ourselves to accidently read in stale data over
new data.  So make sure we check if the extent buffer is not under io before
clearing uptodate, this will kick back EIO to the caller instead of reading in
stale data and keep us from corrupting the fs.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-06 17:34:37 -07:00
Chris Mason 73b802f447 btrfs: fix uninit variable warning
fs/btrfs/send.c:2926: warning: ‘entry’ may be used uninitialized in this
function

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 15:30:44 -07:00
Filipe Manana bfa7e1f8be Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename
For an incremental send, fix the process of determining whether the directory
inode we're currently processing needs to have its move/rename operation delayed.

We were ignoring the fact that if the inode's new immediate ancestor has a higher
inode number than ours but wasn't renamed/moved, we might still need to delay our
move/rename, because some other ancestor directory higher in the hierarchy might
have an inode number higher than ours *and* was renamed/moved too - in this case
we have to wait for rename/move of that ancestor to happen before our current
directory's rename/move operation.

Simple steps to reproduce this issue:

      $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
      $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt

      $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2
      $ mkdir /mnt/a/Z
      $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3/x4/x5

      $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
      $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send

      $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3 /mnt/a/Z/X33
      $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2 /mnt/a/Z/X33/x4/x5/X22

      $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
      $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when
building the path string for directory Z after its references are processed.

A more complex scenario:

      $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
      $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt

      $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d
      $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/e
      $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/f
      $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/a/b/c/d/f/E2
      $ mkdir /mmt/a/b/c/g
      $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d /mnt/a/b/D2

      $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
      $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send

      $ mkdir /mnt/a/o
      $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/g /mnt/a/b/D2/f/G2
      $ mv /mnt/a/b/D2 /mnt/a/b/dd
      $ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/C2
      $ mv /mnt/a/b/dd/f /mnt/a/o/FF
      $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/o/FF/E2/BB

      $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
      $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

A test case for xfstests follows.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 15:25:48 -07:00
Filipe Manana 7b119a8b89 Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename
It's possible to change the parent/child relationship between directories
in such a way that if a child directory has a higher inode number than
its parent, it doesn't necessarily means the child rename/move operation
can be performed immediately. The parent migth have its own rename/move
operation delayed, therefore in this case the child needs to have its
rename/move operation delayed too, and be performed after its new parent's
rename/move.

Steps to reproduce the issue:

      $ umount /mnt
      $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
      $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt

      $ mkdir /mnt/A
      $ mkdir /mnt/B
      $ mkdir /mnt/C
      $ mv /mnt/C /mnt/A
      $ mv /mnt/B /mnt/A/C
      $ mkdir /mnt/A/C/D

      $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
      $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send

      $ mv /mnt/A/C/D /mnt/A/D2
      $ mv /mnt/A/C/B /mnt/A/D2/B2
      $ mv /mnt/A/C /mnt/A/D2/B2/C2

      $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
      $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when
building the path string for directory C after its references are processed.

The necessary conditions here are that C has an inode number higher than both
A and B, and B as an higher inode number higher than A, and D has the highest
inode number, that is:
    inode_number(A) < inode_number(B) < inode_number(C) < inode_number(D)

The same issue could happen if after the first snapshot there's any number
of intermediary parent directories between A2 and B2, and between B2 and C2.

A test case for xfstests follows, covering this simple case and more advanced
ones, with files and hard links created inside the directories.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 15:24:27 -07:00
Filipe Manana 425b5dafc8 Btrfs: remove unnecessary inode generation lookup in send
No need to search in the send tree for the generation number of the inode,
we already have it in the recorded_ref structure passed to us.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-20 17:15:28 -07:00
Liu Bo 2131bcd38b Btrfs: add readahead for send_write
Btrfs send reads data from disk and then writes to a stream via pipe or
a file via flush.

Currently we're going to read each page a time, so every page results
in a disk read, which is not friendly to disks, esp. HDD.  Given that,
the performance can be gained by adding readahead for those pages.

Here is a quick test:
$ btrfs subvolume create send
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 1G" send/foobar
$ btrfs subvolume snap -r send ro
$ time "btrfs send ro -f /dev/null"

           w/o             w
real    1m37.527s       0m9.097s
user    0m0.122s        0m0.086s
sys     0m53.191s       0m12.857s

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:17:19 -04:00
Liu Bo a4d96d6254 Btrfs: share the same code for __record_{new,deleted}_ref
This has no functional change, only picks out the same part of two functions,
and makes it shared.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:17:19 -04:00
Filipe Manana fcbd2154d1 Btrfs: avoid unnecessary utimes update in incremental send
When we're finishing processing of an inode, if we're dealing with a
directory inode that has a pending move/rename operation, we don't
need to send a utimes update instruction to the send stream, as we'll
do it later after doing the move/rename operation. Therefore we save
some time here building paths and doing btree lookups.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:17:18 -04:00
Liu Bo 644d1940ab Btrfs: skip search tree for REG files
It is really unnecessary to search tree again for @gen, @mode and @rdev
in the case of REG inodes' creation, as we've got btrfs_inode_item in sctx,
and @gen, @mode and @rdev can easily be fetched.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:17:01 -04:00
David Sterba 9c9ca00bd3 btrfs: send: simplify allocation code in fs_path_ensure_buf
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:16:59 -04:00
David Sterba 1b2782c8ed btrfs: send: fix old buffer length in fs_path_ensure_buf
In "btrfs: send: lower memory requirements in common case" the code to
save the old_buf_len was incorrectly moved to a wrong place and broke
the original logic.

Reported-by: Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:16:58 -04:00
Filipe Manana bf0d1f441d Btrfs: fix send issuing outdated paths for utimes, chown and chmod
When doing an incremental send, if we had a directory pending a move/rename
operation and none of its parents, except for the immediate parent, were
pending a move/rename, after processing the directory's references, we would
be issuing utimes, chown and chmod intructions against am outdated path - a
path which matched the one in the parent root.

This change also simplifies a bit the code that deals with building a path
for a directory which has a move/rename operation delayed.

Steps to reproduce:

    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
    $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
    $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/e
    $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/f
    $ chmod 0777 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/e
    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
    $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
    $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/f /mnt/btrfs/a/b/f2
    $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/btrfs/a/b/f2/e2
    $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2
    $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2
    $ chmod 0700 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/f2/e2
    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
    $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

    $ umount /mnt/btrfs
    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
    $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
    $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send
    $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send

The second btrfs receive command failed with:

    ERROR: chmod a/b/c/d/e failed. No such file or directory

A test case for xfstests follows.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:16:51 -04:00
Filipe Manana 9dc442143b Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories
The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue
a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently
processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced
the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such
inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation,
because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and
was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit
addressed:

    9f03740a95
    (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send)

This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the
target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail.
Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to
be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation.

Simple steps to reproduce this issue:

    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
    $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
    $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x
    $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y
    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
    $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
    $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY
    $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY
    $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c
    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
    $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

    $ umount /mnt/btrfs
    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
    $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
    $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send
    $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send

The second btrfs receive command failed with:

    ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty

A test case for xfstests follows.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:16:49 -04:00
Filipe Manana 29d6d30f5c Btrfs: send, don't send rmdir for same target multiple times
When doing an incremental send, if we delete a directory that has N > 1
hardlinks for the same file and that file has the highest inode number
inside the directory contents, an incremental send would send N times an
rmdir operation against the directory. This made the btrfs receive command
fail on the second rmdir instruction, as the target directory didn't exist
anymore.

Steps to reproduce the issue:

    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
    $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
    $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c
    $ echo 'ola mundo' > /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/foo.txt
    $ ln /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/foo.txt /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/bar.txt
    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
    $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
    $ rm -f /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/foo.txt
    $ rm -f /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/bar.txt
    $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c
    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
    $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

    $ umount /mnt/btrfs
    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
    $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
    $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send
    $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send

The second btrfs receive command failed with:

    ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. No such file or directory

A test case for xfstests follows.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:16:48 -04:00
Filipe Manana 2b863a135f Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path after dir rename
This fixes yet one more case not caught by the commit titled:

   Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send

In this case, even before the initial full send, we have a directory
which is a child of a directory with a higher inode number. Then we
perform the initial send, and after we rename both the child and the
parent, without moving them around. After doing these 2 renames, an
incremental send sent a rename instruction for the child directory
which contained an invalid "from" path (referenced the parent's old
name, not the new one), which made the btrfs receive command fail.

Steps to reproduce:

    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
    $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
    $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b
    $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/d
    $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c
    $ mv /mnt/btrfs/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c
    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
    $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
    $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x
    $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/y
    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
    $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

    $ umout /mnt/btrfs
    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
    $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
    $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send
    $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send

The second btrfs receive command failed with:
  "ERROR: rename a/b/c/d -> a/b/x/y failed. No such file or directory"

A test case for xfstests follows.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:16:48 -04:00
Wang Shilong dcfd5ad2fc Revert "Btrfs: remove transaction from btrfs send"
This reverts commit 41ce9970a8.
Previously i was thinking we can use readonly root's commit root
safely while it is not true, readonly root may be cowed with the
following cases.

1.snapshot send root will cow source root.
2.balance,device operations will also cow readonly send root
to relocate.

So i have two ideas to make us safe to use commit root.

-->approach 1:
make it protected by transaction and end transaction properly and we research
next item from root node(see btrfs_search_slot_for_read()).

-->approach 2:
add another counter to local root structure to sync snapshot with send.
and add a global counter to sync send with exclusive device operations.

So with approach 2, send can use commit root safely, because we make sure
send root can not be cowed during send. Unfortunately, it make codes *ugly*
and more complex to maintain.

To make snapshot and send exclusively, device operations and send operation
exclusively with each other is a little confusing for common users.

So why not drop into previous way.

Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:16:35 -04:00
David Sterba ace0105076 btrfs: send: lower memory requirements in common case
The fs_path structure uses an inline buffer and falls back to a chain of
allocations, but vmalloc is not necessary because PATH_MAX fits into
PAGE_SIZE.

The size of fs_path has been reduced to 256 bytes from PAGE_SIZE,
usually 4k. Experimental measurements show that most paths on a single
filesystem do not exceed 200 bytes, and these get stored into the inline
buffer directly, which is now 230 bytes. Longer paths are kmalloced when
needed.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:50 -04:00