prom_printf() takes printf style arguments. Specifing GCC's format
attribute reveals that there are several wrong usages of prom_printf().
This fixes those wrong format strings and arguments, and also leaves
format attributes in order to detect similar mistakes at compile time.
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Machines with sun4c support are very rare these days, and noone
is using them for any practical purposes.
The sun4c support has been know broken for quite some time too.
So rather than trying to keep it up-to-date, lets get rid of it.
This allows us to do some very welcome cleanup of sparc32 support.
Updated the former sun4c specifc nmi (which was also used
for sun4m UP) to be a generic UP NMI.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Fix following sparse warnings:
arch/sparc/prom/bootstr_32.c:32:35: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
arch/sparc/prom/memory.c:61:13: warning: symbol 'prom_meminit' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/sparc/prom/misc_32.c:74:1: error: symbol 'prom_halt' redeclared with different type (originally declared at arch/sparc/include/asm/oplib_32.h:67) - different modifiers
arch/sparc/prom/ranges.c:16:26: warning: symbol 'promlib_obio_ranges' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/sparc/prom/ranges.c:17:5: warning: symbol 'num_obio_ranges' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/sparc/prom/ranges.c:39:1: warning: symbol 'prom_adjust_ranges' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/sparc/prom/ranges.c:69:13: warning: symbol 'prom_ranges_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/sparc/prom/tree_32.c:286:22: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
arch/sparc/prom/tree_32.c:286:38: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
None of the warnings indicated any serious issues.
We are now sparse clean for 32 bit build in arch/sparc/prom.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Remove the following unused funtions:
prom_nodematch()
prom_firstprop()
prom_node_has_property()
Also declare a few local functions static.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Remove the following unused funtions:
prom_stopcpu()
prom_idlecpu()
prom_restartcpu()
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
sparc64 systems have a restriction in that passing in buffer
addressses above 4GB to prom calls is not reliable.
We end up violating this when we do prom console writes, because we
use an on-stack buffer to translate '\n' into '\r\n'.
So instead, do this translation into an intermediate buffer, which is
in the kernel image and thus below 4GB, then pass that to the PROM
console write calls.
On the 32-bit side we don't have to deal with any of these issues, so
the new prom_console_write_buf() uses the existing prom_nbputchar()
implementation. However we can now mark those routines static.
Since the 64-bit side completely uses new code we can delete the
putchar bits as they are now completely unused.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This gets us closer to being able to eliminate the use
of dynamic and stack based buffers, so that we can adhere
to the "no buffer addresses above 4GB" rule for PROM calls.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Rather than passing around ints everywhere, use the
phandle type where appropriate for the various functions
that talk to the PROM.
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
__prom_getchild() and __prom_getsibling() are not used anywhere, so
don't export them.
Signed-off-by: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Use sparc64 version of prom/printf.c.
The only differences for sparc32 is that prom_printf is no longer
exported for modules which should be OK.
Signed-off-by: Robert Reif <reif@earthlink.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
While doing some easy cleanups on the sparc code I noticed that the
CONFIG_SUN4 code seems to be worse than the rest - there were some
"I don't know how it should work, but the current code definitely cannot
work." places.
And while I have seen people running Linux on machines like a
SPARCstation 5 a few years ago I don't recall having seen sun4
machines, even less ones running Linux.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The majority of this patch was created by the following script:
***
ASM=arch/sparc/include/asm
mkdir -p $ASM
git mv include/asm-sparc64/ftrace.h $ASM
git rm include/asm-sparc64/*
git mv include/asm-sparc/* $ASM
sed -ie 's/asm-sparc64/asm/g' $ASM/*
sed -ie 's/asm-sparc/asm/g' $ASM/*
***
The rest was an update of the top-level Makefile to use sparc
for header files when sparc64 is being build.
And a small fixlet to pick up the correct unistd.h from
sparc64 code.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Akinobu Mita