The driver only supports hardware timestamping for all incoming
traffic (HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL) which is enabled via Rx Time Sync
Control (TSYNCRXCTL) register already. Therefore, the ethertype
filter set in in igc_ptp_set_timestamp_mode() is useless so this
patch removes it.
Signed-off-by: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@intel.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
In igc_ptp.c we print log messages using dev_* helpers, generating
inconsistent output with the rest of the driver. Since this is a network
device driver, we should preferably use netdev_* helpers because they
append the interface name to the message, helping making sense out of
the logs.
This patch converts all dev_* calls to netdev_*.
Signed-off-by: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@intel.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
commit 5f2958052c ("igc: Add basic skeleton for PTP") added basic
support for PTP, what's missing is support for suspending.
Legacy power management has been added. Now we can add
the suspend method to the igc_shutdown.
By cleaning the runtime storage for timestamp this avoids a possible
invalid memory access when the system comes back from suspend state.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@intel.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Fix sparse warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c:512:6:
warning: symbol 'igc_ptp_tx_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ptp.c:644:6:
warning: symbol 'igc_ptp_suspend' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
For better accuracy, i225 is able to do timestamping using the Start of
Packet signal from the PHY.
Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
This adds support for timestamping packets being transmitted.
Based on the code from i210. The basic differences is that i225 has 4
registers to store the transmit timestamps (i210 has one). Right now,
we only support retrieving from one register, support for using the
other registers will be added later.
Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
This adds support for timestamping received packets.
It is based on the i210, as many features of i225 work the same way.
The main difference from i210 is that i225 has support for choosing
the timer register to use when timestamping packets. Right now, we
only support using timer 0. The other difference is that i225 stores
two timestamps in the receive descriptor, right now, we only retrieve
one.
Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
This allows the creation of the /dev/ptpX device for i225, and reading
and writing the time.
Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Andre Guedes