Commit e1b5bb6d12 ("consolidate cond_syscall
and SYSCALL_ALIAS declarations") broke the h8300 build because it removed
the duplicate SYMBOL_NAME() macro from arch/h8300/include/asm/linkage.h,
and all the h8300 asm files include <asm/linkage.h> instead of
<linux/linkage.h>:
arch/h8300/kernel/entry.S: Assembler messages:
arch/h8300/kernel/entry.S:158: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `('
...
arch/h8300/kernel/syscalls.S: Assembler messages:
arch/h8300/kernel/syscalls.S:6: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `('
...
arch/h8300/lib/abs.S: Assembler messages:
arch/h8300/lib/abs.S:12: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `('
...
arch/h8300/lib/memcpy.S: Assembler messages:
arch/h8300/lib/memcpy.S:13: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `('
...
arch/h8300/lib/memset.S: Assembler messages:
arch/h8300/lib/memset.S:13: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `('
...
Commit 126de6b20b ("linkage.h: fix build
breakage due to symbol prefix handling") broke it even more, by removing
SYMBOL_NAME() and replacing it by __SYMBOL_NAME().
Commit f8ce1faf55 ("Merge tag
'modules-next-for-linus' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linuxkernel/git/rusty/linux")
also removed __SYMBOL_NAME(), hidden in a merge conflict resolution.
Hence, replace the use of SYMBOL_NAME() and SYMBOL_NAME_LABEL() in h8300
assembler sources by hardcoding the underscore symbol prefix, like other
architectures (blackfin/metag) do.
This allows to kill SYMBOL_NAME_LABEL(). Now <asm/linkage.h> becomes empty,
and h8300 can be switched to asm-generic/linkage.h.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
In most cases when AFALGS is manipuled direct this is a bug
and EXTRA_AFLAGS should have been used.
Fix the obvious candidates.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
* sanitize prototypes and annotate
* collapse csum_partial_copy
NB: csum_partial() is almost certainly still buggy.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
Geert Uytterhoeven