Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Peter Oberparleiter da074d0ac8 [PATCH] s390: invalid check after kzalloc()
Typo.  After the call to kzalloc() for kdb->key_maps the test for NULL checks
the wrong variable.

Signed-off-by: Peter Oberparleiter <peter.oberparleiter@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-04-11 06:18:37 -07:00
Eric Sesterhenn 88abaab4f9 [PATCH] s390: kzalloc() conversion in drivers/s390
Convert all kmalloc + memset sequences in drivers/s390 to kzalloc usage.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-03-24 07:33:18 -08:00
Davi Arnaut 172411f10c [PATCH] ebcdic do_kdsk_ioctl off-by-one
Add a missing return check from strnlen_user and fixes a off-by-one when
terminating the string with zero.

Signed-off-by: Davi Arnaut <davi.arnaut@gmail.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-02-01 08:53:25 -08:00
Jesper Juhl 17fd682e54 [PATCH] kfree cleanup: drivers/s390
This is the drivers/s390/ part of the big kfree cleanup patch.

Remove pointless checks for NULL prior to calling kfree() in drivers/s390/.

Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Stefan Bader <Stefan.Bader@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-11-07 07:54:03 -08:00
Linus Torvalds 1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00