Commit Graph

74 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jan Kara 721fb6fbfd fsnotify: Fix busy inodes during unmount
Detaching of mark connector from fsnotify_put_mark() can race with
unmounting of the filesystem like:

  CPU1				CPU2
fsnotify_put_mark()
  spin_lock(&conn->lock);
  ...
  inode = fsnotify_detach_connector_from_object(conn)
  spin_unlock(&conn->lock);
				generic_shutdown_super()
				  fsnotify_unmount_inodes()
				    sees connector detached for inode
				      -> nothing to do
				  evict_inode()
				    barfs on pending inode reference
  iput(inode);

Resulting in "Busy inodes after unmount" message and possible kernel
oops. Make fsnotify_unmount_inodes() properly wait for outstanding inode
references from detached connectors.

Note that the accounting of outstanding inode references in the
superblock can cause some cacheline contention on the counter. OTOH it
happens only during deletion of the last notification mark from an inode
(or during unlinking of watched inode) and that is not too bad. I have
measured time to create & delete inotify watch 100000 times from 64
processes in parallel (each process having its own inotify group and its
own file on a shared superblock) on a 64 CPU machine. Average and
standard deviation of 15 runs look like:

	Avg		Stddev
Vanilla	9.817400	0.276165
Fixed	9.710467	0.228294

So there's no statistically significant difference.

Fixes: 6b3f05d24d ("fsnotify: Detach mark from object list when last reference is dropped")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2018-10-25 15:49:19 +02:00
Amir Goldstein 1e6cb72399 fsnotify: add super block object type
Add the infrastructure to attach a mark to a super_block struct
and detach all attached marks when super block is destroyed.

This is going to be used by fanotify backend to setup super block
marks.

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2018-09-03 15:14:01 +02:00
Jan Kara d3bc0fa841 fsnotify: fix false positive warning on inode delete
When inode is getting deleted and someone else holds reference to a mark
attached to the inode, we just detach the connector from the inode. In
that case fsnotify_put_mark() called from fsnotify_destroy_marks() will
decide to recalculate mask for the inode and __fsnotify_recalc_mask()
will WARN about invalid connector type:

WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 12015 at fs/notify/mark.c:139
__fsnotify_recalc_mask+0x2d7/0x350 fs/notify/mark.c:139

Actually there's no reason to warn about detached connector in
__fsnotify_recalc_mask() so just silently skip updating the mask in such
case.

Reported-by: syzbot+c34692a51b9a6ca93540@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 3ac70bfcde ("fsnotify: add helper to get mask from connector")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2018-08-20 13:55:45 +02:00
Amir Goldstein 3ac70bfcde fsnotify: add helper to get mask from connector
Use a helper to get the mask from the object (i.e. i_fsnotify_mask)
to generalize code of add/remove inode/vfsmount mark.

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2018-06-27 13:45:07 +02:00
Amir Goldstein 36f10f55ff fsnotify: let connector point to an abstract object
Make the code to attach/detach a connector to object more generic
by letting the fsnotify connector point to an abstract fsnotify_connp_t.
Code that needs to dereference an inode or mount object now uses the
helpers fsnotify_conn_{inode,mount}.

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2018-06-27 13:45:05 +02:00
Amir Goldstein b812a9f589 fsnotify: pass connp and object type to fsnotify_add_mark()
Instead of passing inode and vfsmount arguments to fsnotify_add_mark()
and its _locked variant, pass an abstract object pointer and the object
type.

The helpers fsnotify_obj_{inode,mount} are added to get the concrete
object pointer from abstract object pointer.

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2018-06-27 13:45:03 +02:00
Amir Goldstein 9b6e543450 fsnotify: use typedef fsnotify_connp_t for brevity
The object marks manipulation functions fsnotify_destroy_marks()
fsnotify_find_mark() and their helpers take an argument of type
struct fsnotify_mark_connector __rcu ** to dereference the connector
pointer. use a typedef to describe this type for brevity.

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2018-06-27 13:44:59 +02:00
Amir Goldstein 47d9c7cc45 fsnotify: generalize iteration of marks by object type
Make some code that handles marks of object types inode and vfsmount
generic, so it can handle other object types.

Introduce fsnotify_foreach_obj_type macro to iterate marks by object type
and fsnotify_iter_{should|set}_report_type macros to set/test report_mask.

This is going to be used for adding mark of another object type
(super block mark).

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2018-05-18 14:58:22 +02:00
Amir Goldstein d6f7b98bc8 fsnotify: use type id to identify connector object type
An fsnotify_mark_connector is referencing a single type of object
(either inode or vfsmount). Instead of storing a type mask in
connector->flags, store a single type id in connector->type to
identify the type of object.

When a connector object is detached from the object, its type is set
to FSNOTIFY_OBJ_TYPE_DETACHED and this object is not going to be
reused.

The function fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group() is the only place where
type mask was used, so use type flags instead of type id to this
function.

This change is going to be more convenient when adding a new object
type (super block).

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2018-05-18 14:58:22 +02:00
Elena Reshetova ab97f87325 fsnotify: convert fsnotify_mark.refcnt from atomic_t to refcount_t
atomic_t variables are currently used to implement reference
counters with the following properties:
 - counter is initialized to 1 using atomic_set()
 - a resource is freed upon counter reaching zero
 - once counter reaches zero, its further
   increments aren't allowed
 - counter schema uses basic atomic operations
   (set, inc, inc_not_zero, dec_and_test, etc.)

Such atomic variables should be converted to a newly provided
refcount_t type and API that prevents accidental counter overflows
and underflows. This is important since overflows and underflows
can lead to use-after-free situation and be exploitable.

The variable fsnotify_mark.refcnt is used as pure reference counter.
Convert it to refcount_t and fix up the operations.

Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Windsor <dwindsor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-10-31 17:54:56 +01:00
Miklos Szeredi 9a31d7ad99 fsnotify: fix pinning group in fsnotify_prepare_user_wait()
Blind increment of group's user_waits is not enough, we could be far enough
in the group's destruction that it isn't taken into account (i.e. grabbing
the mark ref afterwards doesn't guarantee that it was the ref coming from
the _group_ that was grabbed).

Instead we need to check (under lock) that the mark is still attached to
the group after having obtained a ref to the mark.  If not, skip it.

Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Fixes: 9385a84d7e ("fsnotify: Pass fsnotify_iter_info into handle_event handler")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.12
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-10-31 17:54:56 +01:00
Miklos Szeredi 24c20305c7 fsnotify: clean up fsnotify_prepare/finish_user_wait()
This patch doesn't actually fix any bug, just paves the way for fixing mark
and group pinning.

Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.12
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-10-31 17:54:56 +01:00
Jan Kara 9cf90cef36 fsnotify: Protect bail out path of fsnotify_add_mark_locked() properly
When fsnotify_add_mark_locked() fails it cleans up the mark it was
adding. Since the mark is already visible in group's list, we should
protect update of mark->flags with mark->lock. I'm not aware of any real
issues this could cause (since we also hold group->mark_mutex) but
better be safe and obey locking rules properly.

Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-10-31 17:54:56 +01:00
Dan Carpenter f4edce1afd fsnotify: remove a stray unlock
We recently shifted this code around, so we're no longer holding the
lock on this path.

Fixes: 755b5bc681 ("fsnotify: Remove indirection from mark list addition")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-24 16:41:28 +02:00
Jan Kara 054c636e5c fsnotify: Move ->free_mark callback to fsnotify_ops
Pointer to ->free_mark callback unnecessarily occupies one long in each
fsnotify_mark although they are the same for all marks from one
notification group. Move the callback pointer to fsnotify_ops.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:36 +02:00
Jan Kara 7b12932340 fsnotify: Add group pointer in fsnotify_init_mark()
Currently we initialize mark->group only in fsnotify_add_mark_lock().
However we will need to access fsnotify_ops of corresponding group from
fsnotify_put_mark() so we need mark->group initialized earlier. Do that
in fsnotify_init_mark() which has a consequence that once
fsnotify_init_mark() is called on a mark, the mark has to be destroyed
by fsnotify_put_mark().

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:36 +02:00
Jan Kara 2e37c6ca8d fsnotify: Remove fsnotify_detach_group_marks()
The function is already mostly contained in what
fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group() does. Just update that function to not
select marks when all of them should be destroyed and remove
fsnotify_detach_group_marks().

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:36 +02:00
Jan Kara 18f2e0d3a4 fsnotify: Rename fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags()
The _flags() suffix in the function name was more confusing than
explaining so just remove it. Also rename the argument from 'flags' to
'type' to better explain what the function expects.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:36 +02:00
Jan Kara 66d2b81bcb fsnotify: Remove fsnotify_set_mark_{,ignored_}mask_locked()
These helpers are now only a simple assignment and just obfuscate
what is going on. Remove them.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:36 +02:00
Jan Kara abc77577a6 fsnotify: Provide framework for dropping SRCU lock in ->handle_event
fanotify wants to drop fsnotify_mark_srcu lock when waiting for response
from userspace so that the whole notification subsystem is not blocked
during that time. This patch provides a framework for safely getting
mark reference for a mark found in the object list which pins the mark
in that list. We can then drop fsnotify_mark_srcu, wait for userspace
response and then safely continue iteration of the object list once we
reaquire fsnotify_mark_srcu.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:36 +02:00
Jan Kara f09b04a03e fsnotify: Remove special handling of mark destruction on group shutdown
Currently we queue all marks for destruction on group shutdown and then
destroy them from fsnotify_destroy_group() instead from a worker thread
which is the usual path. However worker can already be processing some
list of marks to destroy so this does not make 100% all marks are really
destroyed by the time group is shut down. This isn't a big problem as
each mark holds group reference and thus group stays partially alive
until all marks are really freed but there's no point in complicating
our lives - just wait for the delayed work to be finished instead.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:36 +02:00
Jan Kara 6b3f05d24d fsnotify: Detach mark from object list when last reference is dropped
Instead of removing mark from object list from fsnotify_detach_mark(),
remove the mark when last reference to the mark is dropped. This will
allow fanotify to wait for userspace response to event without having to
hold onto fsnotify_mark_srcu.

To avoid pinning inodes by elevated refcount (and thus e.g. delaying
file deletion) while someone holds mark reference, we detach connector
from the object also from fsnotify_destroy_marks() and not only after
removing last mark from the list as it was now.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:36 +02:00
Jan Kara 11375145a7 fsnotify: Move queueing of mark for destruction into fsnotify_put_mark()
Currently we queue mark into a list of marks for destruction in
__fsnotify_free_mark() and keep the last mark reference dangling. After the
worker waits for SRCU period, it drops the last reference to the mark
which frees it. This scheme has the disadvantage that if we hold
reference to a mark and drop and reacquire SRCU lock, the mark can get
freed immediately which is slightly inconvenient and we will need to
avoid this in the future.

Move to a scheme where queueing of mark into a list of marks for
destruction happens when the last reference to the mark is dropped. Also
drop reference to the mark held by group list already when mark is
removed from that list instead of dropping it only from the destruction
worker.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:35 +02:00
Jan Kara 08991e83b7 fsnotify: Free fsnotify_mark_connector when there is no mark attached
Currently we free fsnotify_mark_connector structure only when inode /
vfsmount is getting freed. This can however impose noticeable memory
overhead when marks get attached to inodes only temporarily. So free the
connector structure once the last mark is detached from the object.
Since notification infrastructure can be working with the connector
under the protection of fsnotify_mark_srcu, we have to be careful and
free the fsnotify_mark_connector only after SRCU period passes.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:35 +02:00
Jan Kara 04662cab59 fsnotify: Lock object list with connector lock
So far list of marks attached to an object (inode / vfsmount) was
protected by i_lock or mnt_root->d_lock. This dictates that the list
must be empty before the object can be destroyed although the list is
now anchored in the fsnotify_mark_connector structure. Protect the list
by a spinlock in the fsnotify_mark_connector structure to decouple
lifetime of a list of marks from a lifetime of the object. This also
simplifies the code quite a bit since we don't have to differentiate
between inode and vfsmount lists in quite a few places anymore.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:35 +02:00
Jan Kara 2629718dd2 fsnotify: Remove useless list deletion and comment
After removing all the indirection it is clear that

hlist_del_init_rcu(&mark->obj_list);

in fsnotify_destroy_marks() is not needed as the mark gets removed from
the list shortly afterwards in fsnotify_destroy_mark() ->
fsnotify_detach_mark() -> fsnotify_detach_from_object(). Also there is
no problem with mark being visible on object list while we call
fsnotify_destroy_mark() as parallel destruction of marks from several
places is properly handled (as mentioned in the comment in
fsnotify_destroy_marks(). So just remove the list removal and also the
stale comment.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:35 +02:00
Jan Kara 73cd3c33ab fsnotify: Avoid double locking in fsnotify_detach_from_object()
We lock object list lock in fsnotify_detach_from_object() twice - once
to detach mark and second time to recalculate mask. That is unnecessary
and later it will become problematic as we will free the connector as
soon as there is no mark in it. So move recalculation of fsnotify mask
into the same critical section that is detaching mark.

This also removes recalculation of child dentry flags from
fsnotify_detach_from_object(). That is however fine. Those marks will
get recalculated once some event happens on a child.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:35 +02:00
Jan Kara 8212a6097a fsnotify: Remove indirection from fsnotify_detach_mark()
fsnotify_detach_mark() calls fsnotify_destroy_inode_mark() or
fsnotify_destroy_vfsmount_mark() to remove mark from object list. These
two functions are however very similar and differ only in the lock they
use to protect the object list of marks. Simplify the code by removing
the indirection and removing mark from the object list in a common
function.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:35 +02:00
Jan Kara a03e2e4f07 fsnotify: Determine lock in fsnotify_destroy_marks()
Instead of passing spinlock into fsnotify_destroy_marks() determine it
directly in that function from the connector type. This will reduce code
churn when changing lock protecting list of marks.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:35 +02:00
Jan Kara f06fd98759 fsnotify: Move locking into fsnotify_find_mark()
Move locking of a mark list into fsnotify_find_mark(). This reduces code
churn in the following patch changing lock protecting the list.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:35 +02:00
Jan Kara a242677bb1 fsnotify: Move locking into fsnotify_recalc_mask()
Move locking of locks protecting a list of marks into
fsnotify_recalc_mask(). This reduces code churn in the following patch
which changes the lock protecting the list of marks.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:35 +02:00
Jan Kara 0810b4f9f2 fsnotify: Move fsnotify_destroy_marks()
Move fsnotify_destroy_marks() to be later in the fs/notify/mark.c. It
will need some functions that are declared after its current
declaration. No functional change.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:35 +02:00
Jan Kara 755b5bc681 fsnotify: Remove indirection from mark list addition
Adding notification mark to object list has been currently done through
fsnotify_add_{inode|vfsmount}_mark() helpers from
fsnotify_add_mark_locked() which call fsnotify_add_mark_list(). Remove
this unnecessary indirection to simplify the code.

Pushing all the locking to fsnotify_add_mark_list() also allows us to
allocate the connector structure with GFP_KERNEL mode.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:35 +02:00
Jan Kara e911d8af87 fsnotify: Make fsnotify_mark_connector hold inode reference
Currently inode reference is held by fsnotify marks. Change the rules so
that inode reference is held by fsnotify_mark_connector structure
whenever the list is non-empty. This simplifies the code and is more
logical.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:35 +02:00
Jan Kara 86ffe245c4 fsnotify: Move object pointer to fsnotify_mark_connector
Move pointer to inode / vfsmount from mark itself to the
fsnotify_mark_connector structure. This is another step on the path
towards decoupling inode / vfsmount lifetime from notification mark
lifetime.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:35 +02:00
Jan Kara 9dd813c15b fsnotify: Move mark list head from object into dedicated structure
Currently notification marks are attached to object (inode or vfsmnt) by
a hlist_head in the object. The list is also protected by a spinlock in
the object. So while there is any mark attached to the list of marks,
the object must be pinned in memory (and thus e.g. last iput() deleting
inode cannot happen). Also for list iteration in fsnotify() to work, we
must hold fsnotify_mark_srcu lock so that mark itself and
mark->obj_list.next cannot get freed. Thus we are required to wait for
response to fanotify events from userspace process with
fsnotify_mark_srcu lock held. That causes issues when userspace process
is buggy and does not reply to some event - basically the whole
notification subsystem gets eventually stuck.

So to be able to drop fsnotify_mark_srcu lock while waiting for
response, we have to pin the mark in memory and make sure it stays in
the object list (as removing the mark waiting for response could lead to
lost notification events for groups later in the list). However we don't
want inode reclaim to block on such mark as that would lead to system
just locking up elsewhere.

This commit is the first in the series that paves way towards solving
these conflicting lifetime needs. Instead of anchoring the list of marks
directly in the object, we anchor it in a dedicated structure
(fsnotify_mark_connector) and just point to that structure from the
object. The following commits will also add spinlock protecting the list
and object pointer to the structure.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:34 +02:00
Jan Kara c1f33073ac fsnotify: Update comments
Add a comment that lifetime of a notification mark is protected by SRCU
and remove a comment about clearing of marks attached to the inode. It
is stale and more uptodate version is at fsnotify_destroy_marks() which
is the function handling this case.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
2017-04-10 17:37:34 +02:00
Jan Kara e3ba730702 fsnotify: Remove fsnotify_duplicate_mark()
There are only two calls sites of fsnotify_duplicate_mark(). Those are
in kernel/audit_tree.c and both are bogus. Vfsmount pointer is unused
for audit tree, inode pointer and group gets set in
fsnotify_add_mark_locked() later anyway, mask and free_mark are already
set in alloc_chunk(). In fact, calling fsnotify_duplicate_mark() is
actively harmful because following fsnotify_add_mark_locked() will leak
group reference by overwriting the group pointer. So just remove the two
calls to fsnotify_duplicate_mark() and the function.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
[PM: line wrapping to fit in 80 chars]
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2016-12-23 16:40:32 -05:00
Jan Kara 35e481761c fsnotify: avoid spurious EMFILE errors from inotify_init()
Inotify instance is destroyed when all references to it are dropped.
That not only means that the corresponding file descriptor needs to be
closed but also that all corresponding instance marks are freed (as each
mark holds a reference to the inotify instance).  However marks are
freed only after SRCU period ends which can take some time and thus if
user rapidly creates and frees inotify instances, number of existing
inotify instances can exceed max_user_instances limit although from user
point of view there is always at most one existing instance.  Thus
inotify_init() returns EMFILE error which is hard to justify from user
point of view.  This problem is exposed by LTP inotify06 testcase on
some machines.

We fix the problem by making sure all group marks are properly freed
while destroying inotify instance.  We wait for SRCU period to end in
that path anyway since we have to make sure there is no event being
added to the instance while we are tearing down the instance.  So it
takes only some plumbing to allow for marks to be destroyed in that path
as well and not from a dedicated work item.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reported-by: Xiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Xiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-19 19:12:14 -07:00
Jeff Layton 0918f1c309 fsnotify: turn fsnotify reaper thread into a workqueue job
We don't require a dedicated thread for fsnotify cleanup.  Switch it
over to a workqueue job instead that runs on the system_unbound_wq.

In the interest of not thrashing the queued job too often when there are
a lot of marks being removed, we delay the reaper job slightly when
queueing it, to allow several to gather on the list.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Tested-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-02-18 16:23:24 -08:00
Jeff Layton 13d34ac6e5 Revert "fsnotify: destroy marks with call_srcu instead of dedicated thread"
This reverts commit c510eff6be ("fsnotify: destroy marks with
call_srcu instead of dedicated thread").

Eryu reported that he was seeing some OOM kills kick in when running a
testcase that adds and removes inotify marks on a file in a tight loop.

The above commit changed the code to use call_srcu to clean up the
marks.  While that does (in principle) work, the srcu callback job is
limited to cleaning up entries in small batches and only once per jiffy.
It's easily possible to overwhelm that machinery with too many call_srcu
callbacks, and Eryu's reproduer did just that.

There's also another potential problem with using call_srcu here.  While
you can obviously sleep while holding the srcu_read_lock, the callbacks
run under local_bh_disable, so you can't sleep there.

It's possible when putting the last reference to the fsnotify_mark that
we'll end up putting a chain of references including the fsnotify_group,
uid, and associated keys.  While I don't see any obvious ways that that
could occurs, it's probably still best to avoid using call_srcu here
after all.

This patch reverts the above patch.  A later patch will take a different
approach to eliminated the dedicated thread here.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Reported-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-02-18 16:23:24 -08:00
Jeff Layton c510eff6be fsnotify: destroy marks with call_srcu instead of dedicated thread
At the time that this code was originally written, call_srcu didn't
exist, so this thread was required to ensure that we waited for that
SRCU grace period to settle before finally freeing the object.

It does exist now however and we can much more efficiently use call_srcu
to handle this.  That also allows us to potentially use srcu_barrier to
ensure that they are all of the callbacks have run before proceeding.
In order to conserve space, we union the rcu_head with the g_list.

This will be necessary for nfsd which will allocate marks from a
dedicated slabcache.  We have to be able to ensure that all of the
objects are destroyed before destroying the cache.  That's fairly

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-01-14 16:00:49 -08:00
Jan Kara 4712e722f9 fsnotify: get rid of fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked()
fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked() is subtle to use because it temporarily
releases group->mark_mutex.  To avoid future problems with this
function, split it into two.

fsnotify_detach_mark() is the part that needs group->mark_mutex and
fsnotify_free_mark() is the part that must be called outside of
group->mark_mutex.  This way it's much clearer what's going on and we
also avoid some pointless acquisitions of group->mark_mutex.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-09-04 16:54:41 -07:00
Jan Kara 925d1132a0 fsnotify: remove mark->free_list
Free list is used when all marks on given inode / mount should be
destroyed when inode / mount is going away.  However we can free all of
the marks without using a special list with some care.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-09-04 16:54:41 -07:00
Jan Kara 8f2f3eb59d fsnotify: fix oops in fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags()
fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags() can race with
fsnotify_destroy_marks() so that when fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked()
drops mark_mutex, a mark from the list iterated by
fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags() can be freed and thus the next
entry pointer we have cached may become stale and we dereference free
memory.

Fix the problem by first moving marks to free to a special private list
and then always free the first entry in the special list.  This method
is safe even when entries from the list can disappear once we drop the
lock.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Reported-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
Cc: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-08-07 04:39:41 +03:00
Linus Torvalds d725e66c06 Revert "fsnotify: fix oops in fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags()"
This reverts commit a2673b6e04.

Kinglong Mee reports a memory leak with that patch, and Jan Kara confirms:

 "Thanks for report! You are right that my patch introduces a race
  between fsnotify kthread and fsnotify_destroy_group() which can result
  in leaking inotify event on group destruction.

  I haven't yet decided whether the right fix is not to queue events for
  dying notification group (as that is pointless anyway) or whether we
  should just fix the original problem differently...  Whenever I look
  at fsnotify code mark handling I get lost in the maze of locks, lists,
  and subtle differences between how different notification systems
  handle notification marks :( I'll think about it over night"

and after thinking about it, Jan says:

 "OK, I have looked into the code some more and I found another
  relatively simple way of fixing the original oops.  It will be IMHO
  better than trying to fixup this issue which has more potential for
  breakage.  I'll ask Linus to revert the fsnotify fix he already merged
  and send a new fix"

Reported-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Requested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-07-21 16:06:53 -07:00
Jan Kara a2673b6e04 fsnotify: fix oops in fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags()
fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags() can race with
fsnotify_destroy_marks() so when fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked() drops
mark_mutex, a mark from the list iterated by
fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags() can be freed and we dereference free
memory in the loop there.

Fix the problem by keeping mark_mutex held in
fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked().  The reason why we drop that mutex is that
we need to call a ->freeing_mark() callback which may acquire mark_mutex
again.  To avoid this and similar lock inversion issues, we move the call
to ->freeing_mark() callback to the kthread destroying the mark.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reported-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
Suggested-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-07-17 16:39:54 -07:00
Jan Kara 37d469e767 fsnotify: remove destroy_list from fsnotify_mark
destroy_list is used to track marks which still need waiting for srcu
period end before they can be freed.  However by the time mark is added to
destroy_list it isn't in group's list of marks anymore and thus we can
reuse fsnotify_mark->g_list for queueing into destroy_list.  This saves
two pointers for each fsnotify_mark.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-13 12:42:53 -08:00
Jan Kara 0809ab69a2 fsnotify: unify inode and mount marks handling
There's a lot of common code in inode and mount marks handling.  Factor it
out to a common helper function.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-13 12:42:53 -08:00
Jan Kara 8edc6e1688 fanotify: fix notification of groups with inode & mount marks
fsnotify() needs to merge inode and mount marks lists when notifying
groups about events so that ignore masks from inode marks are reflected
in mount mark notifications and groups are notified in proper order
(according to priorities).

Currently the sorting of the lists done by fsnotify_add_inode_mark() /
fsnotify_add_vfsmount_mark() and fsnotify() differed which resulted
ignore masks not being used in some cases.

Fix the problem by always using the same comparison function when
sorting / merging the mark lists.

Thanks to Heinrich Schuchardt for improvements of my patch.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87721
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reported-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Tested-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-11-13 16:17:06 -08:00