It looks like there are two leftovers, at least one of which can leak
the resource (IRQ).
Convert both places to use managed variants of the functions.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
A common pattern with skb_put() is to just want to memcpy()
some data into the new space, introduce skb_put_data() for
this.
An spatch similar to the one for skb_put_zero() converts many
of the places using it:
@@
identifier p, p2;
expression len, skb, data;
type t, t2;
@@
(
-p = skb_put(skb, len);
+p = skb_put_data(skb, data, len);
|
-p = (t)skb_put(skb, len);
+p = skb_put_data(skb, data, len);
)
(
p2 = (t2)p;
-memcpy(p2, data, len);
|
-memcpy(p, data, len);
)
@@
type t, t2;
identifier p, p2;
expression skb, data;
@@
t *p;
...
(
-p = skb_put(skb, sizeof(t));
+p = skb_put_data(skb, data, sizeof(t));
|
-p = (t *)skb_put(skb, sizeof(t));
+p = skb_put_data(skb, data, sizeof(t));
)
(
p2 = (t2)p;
-memcpy(p2, data, sizeof(*p));
|
-memcpy(p, data, sizeof(*p));
)
@@
expression skb, len, data;
@@
-memcpy(skb_put(skb, len), data, len);
+skb_put_data(skb, data, len);
(again, manually post-processed to retain some comments)
Reviewed-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
drivers/nfc/fdp/fdp.c: In function ‘fdp_nci_patch_otp’:
drivers/nfc/fdp/fdp.c:373: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type
drivers/nfc/fdp/fdp.c: In function ‘fdp_nci_patch_ram’:
drivers/nfc/fdp/fdp.c:444: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type
fdp_nci_create_conn() may return a negative error code, which is
silently ignored by assigning it to a u8.
Change conn_id from u8 to int to fix this.
Fixes: a06347c04c ("NFC: Add Intel Fields Peak NFC solution driver")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
When info->ram_patch is released info->otp_patch is being set
to NULL rather than info->ram_patch. I believe this is a cut-n-paste
bug from almost identical code proceeding it that uses the same
idiom for info->otp_patch.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
According to NCI specification, destination type and destination
specific parameters shall uniquely identify a single destination
for the Logical Connection.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Ricard <christophe-h.ricard@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Fields Peak complies with the ISO/IEC 14443A/B, 15693, 18092,
and JIS X 6319-4. It is an NCI based controller.
RF Protocols supported:
- NFC Forum Type 1 Tags (Jewel, Topaz)
- NFC Forum Type 2 Tags (Mifare UL)
- NFC Forum Type 3 Tags (FeliCa)
- NFC Forum Type 4A (ISO/IEC 14443 A-4 106kbps to 848kbps)
- NFC Forum Type 4B (ISO/IEC 14443 B-4 106kbps to 848kbps)
- NFCIP in passive and active modes (ISO/IEC 18092 106kbps
to 424kbps)
- B’ (based on ISO/IEC 14443 B-2)
- iCLASS (based on ISO/IEC 15693-2)
- Vicinity cards (ISO/IEC 15693-3)
- Kovio tags (NFC Forum Type 2)
The device can be enumerated using ACPI using the id INT339A.
The 1st GPIO is the IRQ and the 2nd is the RESET pin.
Signed-off-by: Robert Dolca <robert.dolca@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Andy Shevchenko