Pull vfs updates from Al Viro:
"All kinds of stuff this time around; some more notable parts:
- RCU'd vfsmounts handling
- new primitives for coredump handling
- files_lock is gone
- Bruce's delegations handling series
- exportfs fixes
plus misc stuff all over the place"
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: (101 commits)
ecryptfs: ->f_op is never NULL
locks: break delegations on any attribute modification
locks: break delegations on link
locks: break delegations on rename
locks: helper functions for delegation breaking
locks: break delegations on unlink
namei: minor vfs_unlink cleanup
locks: implement delegations
locks: introduce new FL_DELEG lock flag
vfs: take i_mutex on renamed file
vfs: rename I_MUTEX_QUOTA now that it's not used for quotas
vfs: don't use PARENT/CHILD lock classes for non-directories
vfs: pull ext4's double-i_mutex-locking into common code
exportfs: fix quadratic behavior in filehandle lookup
exportfs: better variable name
exportfs: move most of reconnect_path to helper function
exportfs: eliminate unused "noprogress" counter
exportfs: stop retrying once we race with rename/remove
exportfs: clear DISCONNECTED on all parents sooner
exportfs: more detailed comment for path_reconnect
...
Pull fs-cache fixes from David Howells:
Can you pull these commits to fix an issue with NFS whereby caching can be
enabled on a file that is open for writing by subsequently opening it for
reading. This can be made to crash by opening it for writing again if you're
quick enough.
The gist of the patchset is that the cookie should be acquired at inode
creation only and subsequently enabled and disabled as appropriate (which
dispenses with the backing objects when they're not needed).
The extra synchronisation that NFS does can then be dispensed with as it is
thenceforth managed by FS-Cache.
Could you send these on to Linus?
This likely will need fixing also in CIFS and 9P also once the FS-Cache
changes are upstream. AFS and Ceph are probably safe.
* 'fscache' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs:
NFS: Use i_writecount to control whether to get an fscache cookie in nfs_open()
FS-Cache: Provide the ability to enable/disable cookies
FS-Cache: Add use/unuse/wake cookie wrappers
Use i_writecount to control whether to get an fscache cookie in nfs_open() as
NFS does not do write caching yet. I *think* this is the cause of a problem
encountered by Mark Moseley whereby __fscache_uncache_page() gets a NULL
pointer dereference because cookie->def is NULL:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010
IP: [<ffffffff812a1903>] __fscache_uncache_page+0x23/0x160
PGD 0
Thread overran stack, or stack corrupted
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
Modules linked in: ...
CPU: 7 PID: 18993 Comm: php Not tainted 3.11.1 #1
Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R420/072XWF, BIOS 1.3.5 08/21/2012
task: ffff8804203460c0 ti: ffff880420346640
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff812a1903>] __fscache_uncache_page+0x23/0x160
RSP: 0018:ffff8801053af878 EFLAGS: 00210286
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8800be2f8780 RCX: ffff88022ffae5e8
RDX: 0000000000004c66 RSI: ffffea00055ff440 RDI: ffff8800be2f8780
RBP: ffff8801053af898 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000003
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffea00055ff440
R13: 0000000000001000 R14: ffff8800c50be538 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88042fc60000(0063) knlGS:00000000e439c700
CS: 0010 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000000001d8f000 CR4: 00000000000607f0
Stack:
...
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81365a72>] __nfs_fscache_invalidate_page+0x42/0x70
[<ffffffff813553d5>] nfs_invalidate_page+0x75/0x90
[<ffffffff811b8f5e>] truncate_inode_page+0x8e/0x90
[<ffffffff811b90ad>] truncate_inode_pages_range.part.12+0x14d/0x620
[<ffffffff81d6387d>] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x1fd/0x2e0
[<ffffffff811b95d3>] truncate_inode_pages_range+0x53/0x70
[<ffffffff811b969d>] truncate_inode_pages+0x2d/0x40
[<ffffffff811b96ff>] truncate_pagecache+0x4f/0x70
[<ffffffff81356840>] nfs_setattr_update_inode+0xa0/0x120
[<ffffffff81368de4>] nfs3_proc_setattr+0xc4/0xe0
[<ffffffff81357f78>] nfs_setattr+0xc8/0x150
[<ffffffff8122d95b>] notify_change+0x1cb/0x390
[<ffffffff8120a55b>] do_truncate+0x7b/0xc0
[<ffffffff8121f96c>] do_last+0xa4c/0xfd0
[<ffffffff8121ffbc>] path_openat+0xcc/0x670
[<ffffffff81220a0e>] do_filp_open+0x4e/0xb0
[<ffffffff8120ba1f>] do_sys_open+0x13f/0x2b0
[<ffffffff8126aaf6>] compat_SyS_open+0x36/0x50
[<ffffffff81d7204c>] sysenter_dispatch+0x7/0x24
The code at the instruction pointer was disassembled:
> (gdb) disas __fscache_uncache_page
> Dump of assembler code for function __fscache_uncache_page:
> ...
> 0xffffffff812a18ff <+31>: mov 0x48(%rbx),%rax
> 0xffffffff812a1903 <+35>: cmpb $0x0,0x10(%rax)
> 0xffffffff812a1907 <+39>: je 0xffffffff812a19cd <__fscache_uncache_page+237>
These instructions make up:
ASSERTCMP(cookie->def->type, !=, FSCACHE_COOKIE_TYPE_INDEX);
That cmpb is the faulting instruction (%rax is 0). So cookie->def is NULL -
which presumably means that the cookie has already been at least partway
through __fscache_relinquish_cookie().
What I think may be happening is something like a three-way race on the same
file:
PROCESS 1 PROCESS 2 PROCESS 3
=============== =============== ===============
open(O_TRUNC|O_WRONLY)
open(O_RDONLY)
open(O_WRONLY)
-->nfs_open()
-->nfs_fscache_set_inode_cookie()
nfs_fscache_inode_lock()
nfs_fscache_disable_inode_cookie()
__fscache_relinquish_cookie()
nfs_inode->fscache = NULL
<--nfs_fscache_set_inode_cookie()
-->nfs_open()
-->nfs_fscache_set_inode_cookie()
nfs_fscache_inode_lock()
nfs_fscache_enable_inode_cookie()
__fscache_acquire_cookie()
nfs_inode->fscache = cookie
<--nfs_fscache_set_inode_cookie()
<--nfs_open()
-->nfs_setattr()
...
...
-->nfs_invalidate_page()
-->__nfs_fscache_invalidate_page()
cookie = nfsi->fscache
-->nfs_open()
-->nfs_fscache_set_inode_cookie()
nfs_fscache_inode_lock()
nfs_fscache_disable_inode_cookie()
-->__fscache_relinquish_cookie()
-->__fscache_uncache_page(cookie)
<crash>
<--__fscache_relinquish_cookie()
nfs_inode->fscache = NULL
<--nfs_fscache_set_inode_cookie()
What is needed is something to prevent process #2 from reacquiring the cookie
- and I think checking i_writecount should do the trick.
It's also possible to have a two-way race on this if the file is opened
O_TRUNC|O_RDONLY instead.
Reported-by: Mark Moseley <moseleymark@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Determine if we've created a new file by examining the directory change
attribute and/or the O_EXCL flag.
This fixes a regression when doing a non-exclusive create of a new file.
If the FILE_CREATED flag is not set, the atomic_open() command will
perform full file access permissions checks instead of just checking
for MAY_OPEN.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
This is to ensure that we don't clear the NFS_CONTEXT_RESEND_WRITES
flag while there are still writes that haven't been resent.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
If the server reboots before it can commit the unstable writes to disk,
then nfs_commit_release_pages() will detect this when it compares the
verifier returned by COMMIT to the one returned by WRITE. When this
happens, the client needs to resend those writes in order to guarantee
that they make it to stable storage.
This patch adds a signalling mechanism to notify fsync() that it
needs to retry all writes before it can exit.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
We need to ensure that if the call to filemap_write_and_wait_range()
fails, then we report that error back to the application.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
This patch moves the NFS v4 file functions into a new file that is only
compiled when CONFIG_NFS_V4 is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Linus Torvalds