Hi Linus,
Please, pull the following patches that replace zero-length arrays with
flexible-array members.
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member convertions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.
Notice that all of these patches have been baking in linux-next for
quite a while now and, 238 more of these patches have already been
merged into 5.7-rc1.
There are a couple hundred more of these issues waiting to be addressed
in the whole codebase.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Thanks
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=GsIm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'flexible-array-member-5.7-rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux
Pull flexible-array member conversion from Gustavo Silva:
"The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array
member[1][2], introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof
operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original
implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible
array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of
code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously
applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances
may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member
convertions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of
issues.
Notice that all of these patches have been baking in linux-next for
quite a while now and, 238 more of these patches have already been
merged into 5.7-rc1.
There are a couple hundred more of these issues waiting to be
addressed in the whole codebase"
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
* tag 'flexible-array-member-5.7-rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux: (28 commits)
xattr.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
uapi: linux: fiemap.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
uapi: linux: dlm_device.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
tpm_eventlog.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
ti_wilink_st.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
swap.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
skbuff.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
sched: topology.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
rslib.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
rio.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
posix_acl.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
platform_data: wilco-ec.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
memcontrol.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
list_lru.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
lib: cpu_rmap: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
irq.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
ihex.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
igmp.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
genalloc.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
ethtool.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
...
Seven fixes; three in target, one on a sg error leg, two in qla2xxx
fixing warnings introduced in the last merge window and updating
MAINTAINERS and one in hisi_sas fixing a problem introduced by libata.
Signed-off-by: James E.J. Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iJwEABMIAEQWIQTnYEDbdso9F2cI+arnQslM7pishQUCXptd+CYcamFtZXMuYm90
dG9tbGV5QGhhbnNlbnBhcnRuZXJzaGlwLmNvbQAKCRDnQslM7pishbngAP46suq5
KFaRycXl1lmznlPmM7gyFfszxDV3hp9SusFrzgEAxV4S6vdgEsF2pd5F6EYZoV0i
eCPKR6qDY4SaiUcGFRA=
=B9UG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'scsi-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi
Pull SCSI fixes from James Bottomley:
"Seven fixes: three in target, one on a sg error leg, two in qla2xxx
fixing warnings introduced in the last merge window and updating
MAINTAINERS and one in hisi_sas fixing a problem introduced by libata"
* tag 'scsi-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi:
scsi: sg: add sg_remove_request in sg_common_write
scsi: target: tcmu: reset_ring should reset TCMU_DEV_BIT_BROKEN
scsi: target: fix PR IN / READ FULL STATUS for FC
scsi: target: Write NULL to *port_nexus_ptr if no ISID
scsi: MAINTAINERS: Update qla2xxx FC-SCSI driver maintainer
scsi: qla2xxx: Fix regression warnings
scsi: hisi_sas: Fix build error without SATA_HOST
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
pmbus/isl68137:
Fix up chip IDs
drivetemp:
Return -ENODATA for invalid temperatures
Use true module name
k10temp:
Fix static symbol warnings
jc42:
Use valid hwmon device name
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=gfMJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'hwmon-for-v5.7-rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging
Pull hwmon fixes from Guenter Roeck:
- Fix up chip IDs (isl68137)
- error handling for invalid temperatures and use true module name
(drivetemp)
- Fix static symbol warnings (k10temp)
- Use valid hwmon device name (jc42)
* tag 'hwmon-for-v5.7-rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging:
hwmon: (jc42) Fix name to have no illegal characters
hwmon: (k10temp) make some symbols static
hwmon: (drivetemp) Return -ENODATA for invalid temperatures
hwmon: (drivetemp) Use drivetemp's true module name in Kconfig section
hwmon: (pmbus/isl68137) Fix up chip IDs
- Fix a partially uninitialized variable.
- Teach the background gc threads to apply for fsfreeze protection.
- Fix some scaling problems when multiple threads try to flush the
filesystem when we're about to hit ENOSPC.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=YkcH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'xfs-5.7-fixes-3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux
Pull xfs fixes from Darrick Wong:
"The three commits here fix some livelocks and other clashes with
fsfreeze, a potential corruption problem, and a minor race between
processes freeing and allocating space when the filesystem is near
ENOSPC.
Summary:
- Fix a partially uninitialized variable.
- Teach the background gc threads to apply for fsfreeze protection.
- Fix some scaling problems when multiple threads try to flush the
filesystem when we're about to hit ENOSPC"
* tag 'xfs-5.7-fixes-3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux:
xfs: move inode flush to the sync workqueue
xfs: fix partially uninitialized structure in xfs_reflink_remap_extent
xfs: acquire superblock freeze protection on eofblocks scans
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iHUEABYKAB0WIQRAhzRXHqcMeLMyaSiRxhvAZXjcogUCXprWIAAKCRCRxhvAZXjc
omUyAQCQcvJQhilLv0b7FtBAbN7+TkzV8vAQTzEITuHPa6m/HwEA2Gp9ZDTJfQbV
T6utOrTm/LT0mfBkiDLSnLPtVzh7mgE=
=Jz3d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'for-linus-2020-04-18' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brauner/linux
Pull thread fixes from Christian Brauner:
"A few fixes and minor improvements:
- Correctly validate the cgroup file descriptor when clone3() is used
with CLONE_INTO_CGROUP.
- Check that a new enough version of struct clone_args is passed
which supports the cgroup file descriptor argument when
CLONE_INTO_CGROUP is set in the flags argument.
- Catch nonsensical struct clone_args layouts at build time.
- Catch extensions of struct clone_args without updating the uapi
visible size definitions at build time.
- Check whether the signal is valid early in kill_pid_usb_asyncio()
before doing further work.
- Replace open-coded rcu_read_lock()+kill_pid_info()+rcu_read_unlock()
sequence in kill_something_info() with kill_proc_info() which is a
dedicated helper to do just that"
* tag 'for-linus-2020-04-18' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brauner/linux:
clone3: add build-time CLONE_ARGS_SIZE_VER* validity checks
clone3: add a check for the user struct size if CLONE_INTO_CGROUP is set
clone3: fix cgroup argument sanity check
signal: use kill_proc_info instead of kill_pid_info in kill_something_info
signal: check sig before setting info in kill_pid_usb_asyncio
Pull i2c fixes from Wolfram Sang:
"Some driver bugfixes and an old API removal now that all users are
gone"
* 'i2c/for-current' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux:
i2c: tegra: Synchronize DMA before termination
i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
i2c: remove i2c_new_probed_device API
i2c: altera: use proper variable to hold errno
i2c: designware: platdrv: Remove DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND flag on BYT and CHT
i915:
- Fix guest page access by using the brand new VFIO dma r/w interface (Yan)
- Fix for i915 perf read buffers (Ashutosh)
amdgpu:
- gfx10 fix
- SMU7 overclocking fix
- RAS fix
- GPU reset fix
- Fix a regression in a previous s/r fix
- Add a gfxoff quirk
nouveau:
- fix missing MODULE_FIRMWARE
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=wRCV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'drm-fixes-2020-04-18' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm
Pull drm fixes from Dave Airlie:
"Quiet enough for rc2, mostly amdgpu fixes, a couple of i915 fixes, and
one nouveau module firmware fix:
i915:
- Fix guest page access by using the brand new VFIO dma r/w interface (Yan)
- Fix for i915 perf read buffers (Ashutosh)
amdgpu:
- gfx10 fix
- SMU7 overclocking fix
- RAS fix
- GPU reset fix
- Fix a regression in a previous suspend/resume fix
- Add a gfxoff quirk
nouveau:
- fix missing MODULE_FIRMWARE"
* tag 'drm-fixes-2020-04-18' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm:
drm/nouveau/sec2/gv100-: add missing MODULE_FIRMWARE()
drm/amdgpu/gfx9: add gfxoff quirk
drm/amdgpu: fix the hw hang during perform system reboot and reset
drm/i915/gvt: switch to user vfio_group_pin/upin_pages
drm/i915/gvt: subsitute kvm_read/write_guest with vfio_dma_rw
drm/i915/gvt: hold reference of VFIO group during opening of vgpu
drm/i915/perf: Do not clear pollin for small user read buffers
drm/amdgpu: fix wrong vram lost counter increment V2
drm/amd/powerplay: unload mp1 for Arcturus RAS baco reset
drm/amd/powerplay: force the trim of the mclk dpm_levels if OD is enabled
Revert "drm/amdgpu: change SH MEM alignment mode for gfx10"
The jc42 driver passes I2C client's name as hwmon device name. In case
of device tree probed devices this ends up being part of the compatible
string, "jc-42.4-temp". This name contains hyphens and the hwmon core
doesn't like this:
jc42 2-0018: hwmon: 'jc-42.4-temp' is not a valid name attribute, please fix
This changes the name to "jc42" which doesn't have any illegal
characters.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200417092853.31206-1-s.hauer@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Tremont CPUs support IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES bits to indicate whether
specific SKUs have support for split lock detection.
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200416205754.21177-4-tony.luck@intel.com
The Intel Software Developers' Manual erroneously listed bit 5 of the
IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES register as an architectural feature. It is not.
Features enumerated by IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES are model specific and
implementation details may vary in different cpu models. Thus it is only
safe to trust features after checking the CPU model.
Icelake client and server models are known to implement the split lock
detect feature even though they don't enumerate IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES
[ tglx: Use switch() for readability and massage comments ]
Fixes: 6650cdd9a8 ("x86/split_lock: Enable split lock detection by kernel")
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200416205754.21177-3-tony.luck@intel.com
free_more_memory func has been completely removed in commit bc48f001de
("buffer: eliminate the need to call free_more_memory() in __getblk_slow()")
So comment and `WB_REASON_FREE_MORE_MEM` reason about free_more_memory
are no longer needed.
Fixes: bc48f001de ("buffer: eliminate the need to call free_more_memory() in __getblk_slow()")
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQFDBAABCAAtFiEEIw+MvkEiF49krdp9F0NaE2wMflgFAl6aCQcPHGNvcmJldEBs
d24ubmV0AAoJEBdDWhNsDH5YkCgH/AtTYeNvTQYmdErz/4LCdqLbMqNT1wmP4Wo2
jCjrlG7kbnxnjqnYOuPb3LUFJCv9rQO98lSYEKOY1wjSbA4EBEmikT+Y0p3gBPVn
zD1PYPhfQ3tpEwHcwV081X5SVg4SzQ33KufI+qVJFym6vj2MWbrk9w4YQBiQTb6f
vjy3hZj/nR9+7BKPnPPz4ShtgUCUSEGU7zXo2fs2ZReDrxfH8RV1R/Yx8kOFiPDX
E71gYbY0ljop1O+vuDvrZSufx4PeySYhhZftEuEMVZOGFPU/0AEig3/vEMM87hwy
4UOjao3UkDVZu/fZ6JfGPF1bTLVgElfXejxhaypNrvoVK2DxCRQ=
=BC63
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'docs-fixes' of git://git.lwn.net/linux
Pull documentation fixes from Jonathan Corbet:
"A handful of fixes for reasonably obnoxious documentation issues"
* tag 'docs-fixes' of git://git.lwn.net/linux:
scripts: documentation-file-ref-check: Add line break before exit
scripts/kernel-doc: Add missing close-paren in c:function directives
docs: admin-guide: merge sections for the kernel.modprobe sysctl
docs: timekeeping: Use correct prototype for deprecated functions
Pull proc fix from Eric Biederman:
"While running syzbot happened to spot one more oversight in my rework
of proc_flush_task.
The fields proc_self and proc_thread_self were not being reinitialized
when proc was unmounted, which could cause problems if the mount of
proc fails"
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace:
proc: Handle umounts cleanly
- Fix warnings from enabling more dtc warnings which landed in the merge
window and didn't get fixed in time.
- Fix some document references from DT schema conversions
- Fix kmemleak errors in DT unittests
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=qdNV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'devicetree-fixes-for-5.7' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux
Pull devicetree fixes from Rob Herring:
- Fix warnings from enabling more dtc warnings which landed in the
merge window and didn't get fixed in time.
- Fix some document references from DT schema conversions
- Fix kmemleak errors in DT unittests
* tag 'devicetree-fixes-for-5.7' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux: (23 commits)
kbuild: check libyaml installation for 'make dt_binding_check'
of: unittest: kmemleak in duplicate property update
of: overlay: kmemleak in dup_and_fixup_symbol_prop()
of: unittest: kmemleak in of_unittest_overlay_high_level()
of: unittest: kmemleak in of_unittest_platform_populate()
of: unittest: kmemleak on changeset destroy
MAINTAINERS: dt: fix pointers for ARM Integrator, Versatile and RealView
MAINTAINERS: dt: update display/allwinner file entry
dt-bindings: iio: dac: AD5570R fix bindings errors
dt-bindings: Fix misspellings of "Analog Devices"
dt-bindings: pwm: Fix cros-ec-pwm example dtc 'reg' warning
docs: dt: rockchip,dwc3.txt: fix a pointer to a renamed file
docs: dt: fix a broken reference for a file converted to json
docs: dt: qcom,dwc3.txt: fix cross-reference for a converted file
docs: dt: fix broken reference to phy-cadence-torrent.yaml
dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Fix loongson,parent_int_map property schema
dt-bindings: hwmon: Fix incorrect $id paths
dt-bindings: Fix dtc warnings on reg and ranges in examples
dt-bindings: BD718x7 - add missing I2C bus properties
dt-bindings: clock: syscon-icst: Remove unneeded unit name
...
- Delete the space separator in the __emit_inst macro as it breaks the
clang integrated assembler.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=2DjJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'arm64-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux
Pull arm64 fixes from Catalin Marinas:
- Remove vdso code trying to free unallocated pages.
- Delete the space separator in the __emit_inst macro as it breaks the
clang integrated assembler.
* tag 'arm64-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux:
arm64: Delete the space separator in __emit_inst
arm64: vdso: don't free unallocated pages
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iHUEABYIAB0WIQRTLbB6QfY48x44uB6AXGG7T9hjvgUCXpnH4AAKCRCAXGG7T9hj
vjkNAQD2Rl1RAKSrNP6UdKYr0uaA5CW9AN6+GArQXqulrtx0cAD6AxS9QKox176+
1oDGzmj/72hv8n/vAXST0pmFLD1RLQA=
=+3Ft
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'for-linus-5.7-rc2-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip
Pull xen update from Juergen Gross:
- a small cleanup patch
- a security fix for a bug in the Xen hypervisor to avoid enabling Xen
guests to crash dom0 on an unfixed hypervisor.
* tag 'for-linus-5.7-rc2-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip:
arm/xen: make _xen_start_info static
xen/xenbus: ensure xenbus_map_ring_valloc() returns proper grant status
Resctrl assumes that all CPUs are online when the filesystem is mounted,
and that CPUs remember their CDP-enabled state over CPU hotplug.
This goes wrong when resctrl's CDP-enabled state changes while all the
CPUs in a domain are offline.
When a domain comes online, enable (or disable!) CDP to match resctrl's
current setting.
Fixes: 5ff193fbde ("x86/intel_rdt: Add basic resctrl filesystem support")
Suggested-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200221162105.154163-1-james.morse@arm.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=n9hr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'io_uring-5.7-2020-04-17' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block
Pull io_uring fixes from Jens Axboe:
- wrap up the init/setup cleanup (Pavel)
- fix some issues around deferral sequences (Pavel)
- fix splice punt check using the wrong struct file member
- apply poll re-arm logic for pollable retry too
- pollable retry should honor cancelation
- fix setup time error handling syzbot reported crash
- restore work state when poll is canceled
* tag 'io_uring-5.7-2020-04-17' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block:
io_uring: don't count rqs failed after current one
io_uring: kill already cached timeout.seq_offset
io_uring: fix cached_sq_head in io_timeout()
io_uring: only post events in io_poll_remove_all() if we completed some
io_uring: io_async_task_func() should check and honor cancelation
io_uring: check for need to re-wait in polled async handling
io_uring: correct O_NONBLOCK check for splice punt
io_uring: restore req->work when canceling poll request
io_uring: move all request init code in one place
io_uring: keep all sqe->flags in req->flags
io_uring: early submission req fail code
io_uring: track mm through current->mm
io_uring: remove obsolete @mm_fault
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=W4kQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'block-5.7-2020-04-17' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block
Pull block fixes from Jens Axboe:
- Fix for a driver tag leak in error handling (John)
- Remove now defunct Kconfig selection from dasd (Stefan)
- blk-wbt trace fiexs (Tommi)
* tag 'block-5.7-2020-04-17' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block:
blk-wbt: Drop needless newlines from tracepoint format strings
blk-wbt: Use tracepoint_string() for wbt_step tracepoint string literals
s390/dasd: remove IOSCHED_DEADLINE from DASD Kconfig
blk-mq: Put driver tag in blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list() when no budget
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=MzVj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'libata-5.7-2020-04-17' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block
Pull libata fixlet from Jens Axboe:
"Add yet another Comet Lake PCI ID for ahci"
* tag 'libata-5.7-2020-04-17' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block:
ahci: Add Intel Comet Lake PCH-U PCI ID
Linus Torvalds