Fix a glitch in the procfs dumping of whether the alarm IRQ is enabled: use
the traditional name (from drivers/char/rtc.c and many other places) of
"alarm_IRQ", not "alrm_wakeup" (which didn't even match the efirtc code, which
originated that reporting API).
Also, update a few of the RTC drivers to stop providing that duplicate status,
and/or to expose it properly when reporting the alarm state. We really don't
want every RTC driver doing their own thing here...
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This removes some syslog spam as RTC drivers register; debug messages
shouldn't come out at "info" level.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Update RTC framework so that drivers can constify their method tables, moving
them from ".data" to ".rodata". Then update the drivers.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
The rtc_is_valid_tm() routine needs to treat some of the fields it checks as
unsigned, to prevent wrongly accepting invalid rtc_time structs; this is the
same approach used elsewhere in the RTC code for such tests.
Conversely, rtc_proc_show() is missing one invalid-day-of-month test that
rtc_is_valid_tm() makes: there is no day zero.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This makes RTC core components use "subsys_init" instead of "module_init", as
appropriate for subsystem infrastructure. This is mostly useful for
statically linking drivers in other parts of the tree that may provide an RTC
interface as a secondary functionality (e.g. part of a multifunction chip);
they won't need to worry so much about drivers/Makefile link order.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Acked-by: Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Move the "24hr: yes" proc output from drivers to rtc proc code. This is
required because the time value in the proc output is always in 24hr mode
regardless of the driver.
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Add the proc interface to the RTC subsystem.
The first RTC driver which registers with the class will be accessible by
/proc/driver/rtc .
This is required for compatibility with the standard RTC driver and to avoid
breaking any user space application which may erroneusly rely on this.
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
David Brownell