Impact: cleanup
Now that all APIC code is consolidated there's nothing 'gen' about
apics anymore - so rename 'struct genapic' to 'struct apic'.
This shortens the code and is nicer to read as well.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: cleanup
Reduce the number of include files to worry about.
Also, most of the users of APIC facilities had to
include genapic.h already, which embedded apic.h,
so the distinction was meaningless.
[ include apic.h from genapic.h for compatibility. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: cleanup
make it simpler, don't need have one extra struct.
v2: fix the sgi_uv build
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: cleanup
so could deselect x2apic
and INTR_REMAP will select x2apic
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Remove the 32-bit subarchitecture support code.
All subarchitectures but Voyager have been converted. Voyager will be
done later or will be removed.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: cleanup, reduce kernel size a bit, avoid sparse warning
Fixes sparse warning:
arch/x86/kernel/apic.c:270:5: warning: symbol 'x2apic_icr_read' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Impact: cleanup, reduce kernel size a bit, avoid sparse warning
Fixes sparse warning:
arch/x86/kernel/apic.c:103:5: warning: symbol 'disable_x2apic' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: really halt all CPUs on halt
Function machine_halt (resp. native_machine_halt) is empty for x86
architectures. When command 'halt -f' is invoked, the message "System
halted." is displayed but this is not really true because all CPUs are
still running.
There are also similar inconsistencies for other arches (some uses
power-off for halt or forever-loop with IRQs enabled/disabled).
IMO there should be used the same approach for all architectures OR
what does the message "System halted" really mean?
This patch fixes it for x86.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Change header guards named "ASM_X86__*" to "_ASM_X86_*" since:
a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless.
b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Ingo Molnar