Impact: cleanup, solve 80 columns wrap problems
It would be cleaner to rename all the mpf->mpf_X fields to
mpf->X - that alone would give 4 characters per usage site.
(we already know that it's an 'mpf' entity -
no need to duplicate that in the field too)
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: cleanup, solve 80 columns wrap problems
intel_mp_floating should be renamed to mpf_intel.
The reason: the 'f' in MPF already means 'floating'
which means MP Floating pointer structure -
no need to repeat that in the type name.
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: cleanup, solve 80 columns wrap problems
It would be cleaner to rename all the mpc->mpc_X fields to
mpc->X - that alone would give 4 characters per usage site.
(we already know that it's an 'mpc' entity -
no need to duplicate that in the field too)
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: cleanup, solve 80 columns wrap problems
It would be cleaner to rename all the mpc->oem_X fields to
mpc->X - that alone would give 4 characters per usage site.
(we already know that it's an 'oem' entity -
no need to duplicate that in the field too)
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: cleanup, solve 80 columns wrap problems
It would be cleaner to rename all the mpc->mpc_X fields to
mpc->X - that alone would give 4 characters per usage site.
(we already know that it's an 'mpc' entity -
no need to duplicate that in the field too)
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: cleanup, solve 80 columns wrap problems
It would be cleaner to rename all the mpc->mpc_X fields to
mpc->X - that alone would give 4 characters per usage site.
(we already know that it's an 'mpc' entity -
no need to duplicate that in the field too)
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: cleanup, solve 80 columns wrap problems
It would be cleaner to rename all the mpc->mpc_X fields to
mpc->X - that alone would give 4 characters per usage site.
(we already know that it's an 'mpc' entity -
no need to duplicate that in the field too)
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: cleanup, solve 80 columns wrap problems
It would be cleaner to rename all the mpc->mpc_X fields to
mpc->X - that alone would give 4 characters per usage site.
(we already know that it's an 'mpc' entity -
no need to duplicate that in the field too)
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: cleanup, solve 80 columns wrap problems
It would be cleaner to rename all the mpc->mpc_X fields to
mpc->X - that alone would give 4 characters per usage site.
(we already know that it's an 'mpc' entity -
no need to duplicate that in the field too)
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: cleanup, solve 80 columns wrap problems
mpc_config_oemtable should be renamed to mpc_oemtable.
The reason: the 'c' in MPC already means 'config' -
no need to repeat that in the type name.
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: cleanup, solve 80 columns wrap problems
mpc_config_lintsrc should be renamed to mpc_lintsrc.
The reason: the 'c' in MPC already means 'config' -
no need to repeat that in the type name.
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: cleanup, solve 80 columns wrap problems
mpc_config_intsrc should be renamed to mpc_intsrc.
The reason: the 'c' in MPC already means 'config' -
no need to repeat that in the type name.
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: cleanup, solve 80 columns wrap problems
mpc_config_ioapic should be renamed to mpc_ioapic.
The reason: the 'c' in MPC already means 'config' -
no need to repeat that in the type name.
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: cleanup, solve 80 columns wrap problems
mpc_config_processor should be renamed to mpc_cpu.
The reason: the 'c' in MPC already means 'config' -
no need to repeat that in the type name.
Plus 'processor' is a lot longer than 'cpu' - so we try to use 'cpu' in all
type names, as much as possible.
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: cleanup, solve 80 columns wrap problems
mpc_config_bus should be renamed to mpc_bus.
The reason: the 'c' in MPC already means 'config' -
no need to repeat that in the type name.
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: cleanup, solve 80 columns wrap problems
mp_config_table should be renamed to mpc_table.
The reason: the 'c' in MPC already means 'config' -
no need to repeat that in the type name.
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Change header guards named "ASM_X86__*" to "_ASM_X86_*" since:
a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless.
b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Jaswinder Singh Rajput