Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Rodrigo Vivi ab585dea12 drm/i915: kill i915.powersave
This flag was being mostly used as a meta flag in some
cases and not covering other cases.

One of the risks is that it was masking some frontbuffer
trackings without disabling PSR.

So, better to kill this at once and avoid umbrella parameters.

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: Drop unused out: label to appease gcc.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-03-26 13:04:23 +01:00
Paulo Zanoni dbef0f15b5 drm/i915: add frontbuffer tracking to FBC
Kill the blt/render tracking we currently have and use the frontbuffer
tracking infrastructure.

Don't enable things by default yet.

v2: (Rodrigo) Fix small conflict on rebase and typo at subject.
v3: (Paulo) Rebase on RENDER_CS change.
v4: (Paulo) Rebase.
v5: (Paulo) Simplify: flushes don't have origin (Daniel).
            Also rebase due to patch order changes.

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-03-17 22:29:56 +01:00
Paulo Zanoni a4001f1b75 drm/i915: pass which operation triggered the frontbuffer tracking
We want to port FBC to the frontbuffer tracking infrastructure, but
for that we need to know what caused the object invalidation so
we can react accordingly: CPU mmaps need manual, GTT mmaps and
flips don't need handling and ring rendering needs nukes.

v2: - s/ORIGIN_RENDER/ORIGIN_CS/ (Daniel, Rodrigo)
    - Fix copy/pasted wrong documentation
    - Rebase
v3: - Rebase
v4: - Don't pass the operation to flushes (Daniel).

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-03-17 22:29:51 +01:00
Vandana Kannan a93fad0f7f drm/i915: DRRS calls based on frontbuffer
Calls have been added to invalidate/flush DRRS whenever invalidate/flush is
called as part of frontbuffer tracking.
Apart from calls as a result of GEM tracking to fb invalidate/flush, a
call has been added to invalidate fb obj from crtc_page_flip as well. This
is to track busyness through flip calls.
The call to fb_obj_invalidate (in flip) is placed before queuing flip for this
obj.

drrs_invalidate() and drrs_flush() check for drrs.dp which would be NULL if
it was setup in drrs_enable(). This covers for the condition when DRRS is
not supported.

v2: Removing the call to invalidate_drrs from page_flip.
This has not been tested on Android yet, but, in case DRRS transtions do not
work as expected, check by adding back this call in page_flip.

Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2015-01-27 09:51:15 +01:00
Rodrigo Vivi 0bc12bcb1b drm/i915: Introduce intel_psr.c
No functional changes. Just cleaning and reorganizing it.

v2: Rebase it puting it to begin of psr rework. This helps to blame easily
at least latest changes.

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-11-17 19:12:28 +01:00
Daniel Vetter 5c323b2a78 drm/i915: spelling fixes for frontbuffer tracking kerneldoc
Oh well.

v2: Fix one more spelling fail Paulo spotted.

Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-10-01 10:52:57 +02:00
Daniel Vetter 11c9b6c628 drm/i915: Tighting frontbuffer tracking around flips
So I think I've spotted a small gap in the frontbuffer tracking
while discussing the logic with Paulo on irc:

1. Userspace schedules gpu rendering to the current frontbuffer.
This gets tracked in dev_priv->fb_tracking.busy_bits.

2. We pageflip a fully rendered buffer before the frontbuffer
rendering completes.

3. The request retiring will never clear busy_bits (since at retire
time the old frontbuffer won't have obj->frontbuffer_bits set), so
these bits now are stuck until someone again does a bit of frontbuffer
tracking.

If we clear stale busy_bits in flip_prepare this gap is closed.

Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-10-01 10:52:56 +02:00
Rodrigo Vivi 1d73c2a8f2 drm/i915: Minimize the huge amount of unecessary fbc sw cache clean.
The sw cache clean on BDW is a tempoorary workaround because we cannot
set cache clean on blt ring with risk of hungs. So we are doing the cache clean on sw.
However we are doing much more than needed. Not only when using blt ring.
So, with this extra w/a we minimize the ammount of cache cleans and call it only
on same cases that it was being called on gen7.

The traditional FBC Cache clean happens over LRI on BLT ring when there is a
frontbuffer touch happening. frontbuffer tracking set fbc_dirty variable
to let BLT flush that it must clean FBC cache.

fbc.need_sw_cache_clean works in the opposite information direction
of ring->fbc_dirty telling software on frontbuffer tracking to perform
the cache clean on sw side.

v2: Clean it a little bit and fully check for Broadwell instead of gen8.

v3: Rebase after frontbuffer organization.

v4: Wiggle confused me. So fixing v3!

Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-09-29 14:17:31 +02:00
Daniel Vetter b680c37a4d drm/i915: DocBook integration for frontbuffer tracking
I shouldn't ask everyone to do this and fail myself ...

This extracts all the frontbuffer tracking functions into
intel_frontbuffer.c, adds a DOC overview section and also adds the
missing kerneldoc for i915_gem_track_fb and also pulls it into the
same section for convenience.

v2: Don't forget about the header files.

v3: Oops, might check compilation next time around. To make my life
easier drop the increase_pllclock from set_base_atomic since really,
it doesn't matter if you see your Oops or kgdb with a tiny bit of lag.

v4: Try to better explain how to actually use this, requested by Paulo
on irc.

v5: Explain invalidate/flush a bit clearer.

v6: s/business/busyness/

Acked-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
2014-09-19 19:46:49 +02:00