Some maros were not well aligned. Re-align them.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
The register naming convention for clock domain control inside
power domain instance is:
OMAPXXXX_<partition>_<power_domain>_<clock_domain>_CDOFFS
Both CPU0 and CPU1 use MPU as clock domain name instead of CPU0
and CPU1.
Change the name to stick to the convention.
The autogen scripts are updated accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
CPU0 and CPU1 clockdomain is at the offset of 0x18 from the LPRM base.
The header file has set it wrongly to 0x0. Offset 0x0 is for CPUx power
domain control register
Fix the same.
The autogen scripts is fixed thanks to Benoit Cousson
With the old value, the clockdomain code would access the
*_PWRSTCTRL.POWERSTATE field when it thought it was accessing the
*_CLKSTCTRL.CLKTRCTRL field. In the worst case, this could cause
system power management to behave incorrectly.
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
[paul@pwsan.com: added second paragraph to commit message]
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
In OMAP4 CM instances, some registers (CM_CLKSTCTRL, CM_STATICDEP,
CM_DYNAMICDEP, and the module-specific registers underneath) are
organized by clockdomain. Add the clockdomain offset macros to the
appropriate PRCM module header files.
This data was almost completely autogenerated from the TI hardware
database; the autogeneration scripts have been updated.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Tested-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
In some ways, the OMAP4 PRCM register layout is quite different than
the OMAP2/3 PRCM register layout. For example, on OMAP2/3, from a
register layout point of view, all CM instances were located in the CM
subsystem, and all PRM instances were located in the PRM subsystem.
OMAP4 changes this. Now, for example, some CM instances, such as
WKUP_CM and EMU_CM, are located in the system PRM subsystem. And a
"local PRCM" exists for the MPU - this PRCM combines registers that
would normally appear in both CM and PRM instances, but uses its own
register layout which matches neither the OMAP2/3 PRCM layout nor the
OMAP4 PRCM layout.
To try to deal with this, introduce some new functions, omap4_cminst*
and omap4_prminst*. The former is to be used when writing to a CM
instance register (no matter what subsystem or hardware module it
exists in), and the latter, similarly, with PRM instance registers.
To determine which "PRCM partition" to write to, the functions take a
PRCM instance ID argument. Subsequent patches add these partition IDs
to the OMAP4 powerdomain and clockdomain definitions.
As far as I can see, there's really no good way to handle these types
of register access inconsistencies. This patch seemed like the least
bad approach.
Moving forward, the long-term goal is to remove all direct PRCM
register access from the PM code. PRCM register access should go
through layers such as the powerdomain and clockdomain code that can
hide the details of how to interact with the specific hardware
variant.
While here, rename cm4xxx.c to cm44xx.c to match the naming convention
of the other OMAP4 PRCM files.
Thanks to Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, Rajendra Nayak
<rnayak@ti.com>, and Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> for some comments.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Back in the OMAP2/3 PRCM interface days, the macros that referred to
the offsets of individual PRM/CM instances from the top of the PRM/CM
hardware modules were incorrectly suffixed with "_MOD". (They should
have been suffixed with something like "_INST" or "_INSTANCE".) These
days, now that we have better contact with the OMAP hardware people,
we know that this naming is wrong. And in fact in OMAP4, there are
actual hardware module offsets inside the instances, so the incorrect
naming gets confusing very quickly for anyone who knows the hardware.
Fix this naming for OMAP4, before things get too far along, by
changing "_MOD" to "_INST" on the end of these macros. So, for
example, OMAP4430_CM2_INSTR_MOD becomes OMAP4430_CM2_INSTR_INST.
This unfortunately creates quite a large diff, but it is a
straightforward rename. This patch should not result in any
functional changes.
The autogeneration scripts have been updated accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Tested-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Split the existing cm44xx.h file into cm1_44xx.h and cm2_44xx.h files
so they match their underlying OMAP hardware modules. Add clockdomain
offset information.
Add header files for the MPU local PRCM, prcm_mpu44xx.h, and for the
SCRM, scrm44xx.h. SCRM register offsets still need to be added; TI
should do this.
Move the "_MOD" macros out of the prcm-common.h header file, into the
header file of the hardware module that they belong to. For example,
OMAP4430_PRM_*_MOD macros have been moved into the prm44xx.h header.
Adjust #includes of all files that used the old PRCM header file names
to point to the new filenames.
The autogeneration scripts have been updated accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Tested-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Benoit Cousson