This consolidates the routines of_find_node_by_path, of_find_node_by_name,
of_find_node_by_type and of_find_compatible_device. Again, the comparison
of strings are done differently by Sparc and PowerPC and also these add
read_locks around the iterations.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Acked-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This adds a read_lock around the child/next accesses on Sparc.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Acked-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This requires creating dummy of_node_{get,put} routines for sparc and
sparc64. It also adds a read_lock around the parent accesses.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Acked-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The only change here is that a readlock is taken while the property list
is being traversed on Sparc where it was not taken previously.
Also, Sparc uses strcasecmp to compare property names while PowerPC
uses strcmp.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Acked-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The only difference here is that Sparc uses strncmp to match compatibility
names while PowerPC uses strncasecmp.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Acked-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This creates drivers/of/base.c (depending on CONFIG_OF) and puts
the first trivially common bits from the prom.c files into it.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Acked-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Stephen Rothwell