CPUFreq drivers that use clock frameworks interface,i.e. clk_get_rate(),
to get CPUs clk rate, have similar sort of code used in most of them.
This patch adds a generic ->get() which will do the same thing for them.
All those drivers are required to now is to set .get to cpufreq_generic_get()
and set their clk pointer in policy->clk during ->init().
Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Sometimes boot loaders set CPU frequency to a value outside of frequency table
present with cpufreq core. In such cases CPU might be unstable if it has to run
on that frequency for long duration of time and so its better to set it to a
frequency which is specified in frequency table.
On some systems we can't really say what frequency we're running at the moment
and so for these we shouldn't check if we are running at a frequency present in
frequency table. And so we really can't force this for all the cpufreq drivers.
Hence we are created another flag here: CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK that
will be marked by platforms which want to go for this check at boot time.
Initially this is done for all ARM platforms but others may follow if required.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything
on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for
doing this work, work/tasklet/etc..
They may continue doing notification from their own code as flag:
CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION is already set for them.
All drivers are also modified in this patch to avoid breaking 'git bisect', as
double notification would happen otherwise.
Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Tested-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is:
int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq,
unsigned int relation);
And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid
index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they
don't use target_freq and relation after that.
So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be
done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For
others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers
are converted to expose frequency tables.
This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine.
It looks like this:
int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index);
CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this
routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines
present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time.
This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid
using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly.
It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight
.target_index() routine for many driver.
Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
The index field of cpufreq_frequency_table has been renamed to
driver_data by commit 5070158 (cpufreq: rename index as driver_data
in cpufreq_frequency_table).
This patch updates the s3c64xx driver to match.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: 3.11+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.11+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.
Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.
This patch uses these generic routines in the s3cx4xx driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr().
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This exposes frequency table of driver to cpufreq core and is required for core
to guess what the index for a target frequency is, when it calls
cpufreq_frequency_table_target(). And so this driver needs to expose it.
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
We don't need to set .owner = THIS_MODULE any more in cpufreq drivers
as this field isn't used any more by the cpufreq core.
This patch removes it and updates all dependent drivers accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers must be called in groups, i.e either both
should be called or both shouldn't be.
In case we have started PRECHANGE notifier and found an error, we must call
POSTCHANGE notifier with freqs.new = freqs.old to guarantee that sequence of
calling notifiers is complete.
This patch fixes it.
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
The "index" field of struct cpufreq_frequency_table was never an
index and isn't used at all by the cpufreq core. It only is useful
for cpufreq drivers for their internal purposes.
Many people nowadays blindly set it in ascending order with the
assumption that the core will use it, which is a mistake.
Rename it to "driver_data" as that's what its purpose is. All of its
users are updated accordingly.
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
policy->cpus contains all online cpus that have single shared clock line. And
their frequencies are always updated together.
Many SMP system's cpufreq drivers take care of this in individual drivers but
the best place for this code is in cpufreq core.
This patch modifies cpufreq_notify_transition() to notify frequency change for
all cpus in policy->cpus and hence updates all users of this API.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
We don't have any of the other code for VDDINT, including the variable
declaration, so don't try to get it as we can't build.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
They're already consistent but it saves remembering to do so.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
The header change has removed an implicit include of module.h, breaking
the build due to the use of THIS_MODULE. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
By extension from the 667MHz based clocks currently supported add 100MHz
and 200MHz operating points. Due to a lack of documentation these have not
been confirmed as supported but by extension from the existing frequencies
they should be OK, and I've given them quite a bit of runtime testing.
The major risk is synchronization with the non-ARM clocks but as we
can't currently scale the ARM PLL the risk should be relatively low.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
The CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notification is used to update things that depend on
the system clock rates. Since this may include the interfaces used to talk
to the regulators do the notification before we try to update regulators
to reflect lowered system clock rate.
The voltage scaling is just a power optimisation and may not happen at all
so there's no concern about it not having completed.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
At least some newer S3C6410 silicon supports operation up to 800MHz rather
than just 667MHz. Unfortunately I don't have access to any of documentation
of this other than some running systems, add a new cpufreq table entry for
this based on the behaviour of those systems.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Viresh Kumar