4 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Thomas Gleixner	a7f4255f90	x86: Derandom delay_tsc for 64 bit ... Commit f0fbf0abc0 ("x86: integrate delay functions") converted delay_tsc() into a random delay generator for 64 bit. The reason is that it merged the mostly identical versions of delay_32.c and delay_64.c. Though the subtle difference of the result was: static void delay_tsc(unsigned long loops) { - unsigned bclock, now; + unsigned long bclock, now; Now the function uses rdtscl() which returns the lower 32bit of the TSC. On 32bit that's not problematic as unsigned long is 32bit. On 64 bit this fails when the lower 32bit are close to wrap around when bclock is read, because the following check if ((now - bclock) >= loops) break; evaluated to true on 64bit for e.g. bclock = 0xffffffff and now = 0 because the unsigned long (now - bclock) of these values results in 0xffffffff00000001 which is definitely larger than the loops value. That explains Tvortkos observation: "Because I am seeing udelay(500) (_occasionally_) being short, and that by delaying for some duration between 0us (yep) and 491us." Make those variables explicitely u32 again, so this works for both 32 and 64 bit. Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@onelan.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # >= 2.6.27 Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>	2012-03-09 12:43:27 -08:00
Christoph Lameter	357089fca9	x86: udelay: Use this_cpu_read to avoid address calculation ... The code will use a segment prefix instead of doing the lookup and calculation. Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Acked-by: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>	2011-01-04 06:08:55 +01:00
Pallipadi, Venkatesh	e888d7facd	x86, delay: tsc based udelay should have rdtsc_barrier ... delay_tsc needs rdtsc_barrier to provide proper delay. Output from a test driver using hpet to cross check delay provided by udelay(). Before: [ 86.794363] Expected delay 5us actual 4679ns [ 87.154362] Expected delay 5us actual 698ns [ 87.514162] Expected delay 5us actual 4539ns [ 88.653716] Expected delay 5us actual 4539ns [ 94.664106] Expected delay 10us actual 9638ns [ 95.049351] Expected delay 10us actual 10126ns [ 95.416110] Expected delay 10us actual 9568ns [ 95.799216] Expected delay 10us actual 9638ns [ 103.624104] Expected delay 10us actual 9707ns [ 104.020619] Expected delay 10us actual 768ns [ 104.419951] Expected delay 10us actual 9707ns After: [ 50.983320] Expected delay 5us actual 5587ns [ 51.261807] Expected delay 5us actual 5587ns [ 51.565715] Expected delay 5us actual 5657ns [ 51.861171] Expected delay 5us actual 5587ns [ 52.164704] Expected delay 5us actual 5726ns [ 52.487457] Expected delay 5us actual 5657ns [ 52.789338] Expected delay 5us actual 5726ns [ 57.119680] Expected delay 10us actual 10755ns [ 57.893997] Expected delay 10us actual 10615ns [ 58.261287] Expected delay 10us actual 10755ns [ 58.620505] Expected delay 10us actual 10825ns [ 58.941035] Expected delay 10us actual 10755ns [ 59.320903] Expected delay 10us actual 10615ns [ 61.306311] Expected delay 10us actual 10755ns [ 61.520542] Expected delay 10us actual 10615ns Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>	2009-06-25 16:47:40 -07:00
Glauber Costa	f0fbf0abc0	x86: integrate delay functions. ... delay_32.c, delay_64.c are now equal, and are integrated into delay.c. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>	2008-07-09 08:52:05 +02:00