"discard" support, some dm-raid improvements and other assorted
bits and pieces.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)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=XRmL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'md-3.7' of git://neil.brown.name/md
Pull md updates from NeilBrown:
- "discard" support, some dm-raid improvements and other assorted bits
and pieces.
* tag 'md-3.7' of git://neil.brown.name/md: (29 commits)
md: refine reporting of resync/reshape delays.
md/raid5: be careful not to resize_stripes too big.
md: make sure manual changes to recovery checkpoint are saved.
md/raid10: use correct limit variable
md: writing to sync_action should clear the read-auto state.
Subject: [PATCH] md:change resync_mismatches to atomic64_t to avoid races
md/raid5: make sure to_read and to_write never go negative.
md: When RAID5 is dirty, force reconstruct-write instead of read-modify-write.
md/raid5: protect debug message against NULL derefernce.
md/raid5: add some missing locking in handle_failed_stripe.
MD: raid5 avoid unnecessary zero page for trim
MD: raid5 trim support
md/bitmap:Don't use IS_ERR to judge alloc_page().
md/raid1: Don't release reference to device while handling read error.
raid: replace list_for_each_continue_rcu with new interface
add further __init annotations to crypto/xor.c
DM RAID: Fix for "sync" directive ineffectiveness
DM RAID: Fix comparison of index and quantity for "rebuild" parameter
DM RAID: Add rebuild capability for RAID10
DM RAID: Move 'rebuild' checking code to its own function
...
When a RAID5 is reshaping, conf->raid_disks is increased
before mddev->delta_disks becomes zero.
This can result in check_reshape calling resize_stripes with a
number that is too large. This particularly happens
when md_check_recovery calls ->check_reshape().
If we use ->previous_raid_disks, we don't risk this.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Now that multiple threads can handle stripes, it is safer to
use an atomic64_t for resync_mismatches, to avoid update races.
Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
to_read and to_write are part of the result of analysing
a stripe before handling it.
Their use is to avoid some loops and tests if the values are
known to be zero. Thus it is not a problem if they are a
little bit larger than they should be.
So decrementing them in handle_failed_stripe serves little value, and
due to races it could cause some loops to be skipped incorrectly.
So remove those decrements.
Reported-by: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The pr_debug in add_stripe_bio could race with something
changing *bip, so it is best to hold the lock until
after the pr_debug.
Reported-by: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
We really should hold the stripe_lock while accessing
'toread' else we could race with add_stripe_bio and corrupt
a list.
Reported-by: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
We want to avoid zero discarded dev page, because it's useless for discard.
But if we don't zero it, another read/write hit such page in the cache and will
get inconsistent data.
To avoid zero the page, we don't set R5_UPTODATE flag after construction is
done. In this way, discard write request is still issued and finished, but read
will not hit the page. If the stripe gets accessed soon, we need reread the
stripe, but since the chance is low, the reread isn't a big deal.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Discard for raid4/5/6 has limitation. If discard request size is
small, we do discard for one disk, but we need calculate parity and
write parity disk. To correctly calculate parity, zero_after_discard
must be guaranteed. Even it's true, we need do discard for one disk
but write another disks, which makes the parity disks wear out
fast. This doesn't make sense. So an efficient discard for raid4/5/6
should discard all data disks and parity disks, which requires the
write pattern to be (A, A+chunk_size, A+chunk_size*2...). If A's size
is smaller than chunk_size, such pattern is almost impossible in
practice. So in this patch, I only handle the case that A's size
equals to chunk_size. That is discard request should be aligned to
stripe size and its size is multiple of stripe size.
Since we can only handle request with specific alignment and size (or
part of the request fitting stripes), we can't guarantee
zero_after_discard even zero_after_discard is true in low level
drives.
The block layer doesn't send down correctly aligned requests even
correct discard alignment is set, so I must filter out.
For raid4/5/6 parity calculation, if data is 0, parity is 0. So if
zero_after_discard is true for all disks, data is consistent after
discard. Otherwise, data might be lost. Let's consider a scenario:
discard a stripe, write data to one disk and write parity disk. The
stripe could be still inconsistent till then depending on using data
from other data disks or parity disks to calculate new parity. If the
disk is broken, we can't restore it. So in this patch, we only enable
discard support if all disks have zero_after_discard.
If discard fails in one disk, we face the similar inconsistent issue
above. The patch will make discard follow the same path as normal
write request. If discard fails, a resync will be scheduled to make
the data consistent. This isn't good to have extra writes, but data
consistency is important.
If a subsequent read/write request hits raid5 cache of a discarded
stripe, the discarded dev page should have zero filled, so the data is
consistent. This patch will always zero dev page for discarded request
stripe. This isn't optimal because discard request doesn't need such
payload. Next patch will avoid it.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Change the thread parameter, so the thread can carry extra info. Next patch
will use it.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
commit b17459c050
raid5: add a per-stripe lock
added a spin_lock to the 'stripe_head' struct.
Unfortunately there are two places where this struct is allocated
but the spin lock was only initialised in one of them.
So add the missing spin_lock_init.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When a replacement device becomes active, we mark the device that it
replaces as 'faulty' so that it can subsequently get removed.
However 'calc_degraded' only pays attention to the primary device, not
the replacement, so the array appears to become degraded, which is
wrong.
So teach 'calc_degraded' to consider any replacement if a primary
device is faulty.
This is suitable for -stable as an incorrect 'degraded' value can
confuse md and could lead to data corruption.
This is only relevant for 3.3 and later.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Robin Hill <robin@robinhill.me.uk>
Reported-by: John Drescher <drescherjm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
This reverts commit 895e3c5c58.
While this patch seemed like a good idea and did help some workloads,
it hurts other workloads.
Large sequential O_DIRECT writes were faster,
Small random O_DIRECT writes were slower.
Other changes (batching RAID5 writes) have improved the sequential
writes using a different mechanism, so the net result of this patch
is definitely negative. So revert it.
Reported-by: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
This contains a few patches that depend on
plugging changes in the block layer so needs to wait
for those.
It also contains a Kconfig fix for the new RAID10 support
in dm-raid.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
iQIVAwUAUBnKUznsnt1WYoG5AQJOQA/+M7RoVnF63+TbGIqdNDotuF8FxvudCZBl
Ou2yG47EOPtWf/RoqPyfpydDgdjyXsk4T5TfXoc0hsXVr4shCYo51uT9K34TMSDJ
2GzGWuyugRJFyvxW7PBgM+zFWlcVdgUGcwsdmIUMtHRz8Q10TqO5fE22RNLkhwOl
fvGCK1KYnQqlG87DbulHWMo22vyZVic8jBqFSw55CPuuFMSJMxCw0rOPUnvk5Q8v
jWzZzuUqrM8iiOxTDHsbCA0IleCbGl/m0tgk02Vj4tkCvz9N/xzQW2se0H6uECiK
k8odbAiNBOh1q135sa7ASrBzxT+JqSiQ25rLheTEzzNxjFv6/NlntXmYu6HB+lD3
DoHAvRjgMxiLCdisW6TJb10NItitXwE/HSpQOVRxyYtINdzmhIDaCccgfN8ZMkho
nmE/uzO+CAoCFpZC2C/nY8D0BZs5fw4hgDAsci66mvs+88dy+SoA4AbyNEMAusOS
tiL8ZEjnYXvxTh3JFaMIaqQd6PkbahmtEtvorwXsUYUdY0ybkcs2FYVksvkgYdyW
WlejOZVurY2i5biqck3UqjesxeJA5TMAlAUQR7vXu1Fa9fYFXZbqJom/KnPRTfek
xerCWPMbhuzmcyEjUOGfjs6GFEnEmRT6Q6fN3CBaQMS2Q/z+6AkTOXKVl5Fhvoyl
aeu1m8nZLuI=
=ovN2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'md-3.6' of git://neil.brown.name/md
Pull additional md update from NeilBrown:
"This contains a few patches that depend on plugging changes in the
block layer so needed to wait for those.
It also contains a Kconfig fix for the new RAID10 support in dm-raid."
* tag 'md-3.6' of git://neil.brown.name/md:
md/dm-raid: DM_RAID should select MD_RAID10
md/raid1: submit IO from originating thread instead of md thread.
raid5: raid5d handle stripe in batch way
raid5: make_request use batch stripe release
Let raid5d handle stripe in batch way to reduce conf->device_lock locking.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
make_request() does stripe release for every stripe and the stripe usually has
count 1, which makes previous release_stripe() optimization not work. In my
test, this release_stripe() becomes the heaviest pleace to take
conf->device_lock after previous patches applied.
Below patch makes stripe release batch. All the stripes will be released in
unplug. The STRIPE_ON_UNPLUG_LIST bit is to protect concurrent access stripe
lru.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Pull block driver changes from Jens Axboe:
- Making the plugging support for drivers a bit more sane from Neil.
This supersedes the plugging change from Shaohua as well.
- The usual round of drbd updates.
- Using a tail add instead of a head add in the request completion for
ndb, making us find the most completed request more quickly.
- A few floppy changes, getting rid of a duplicated flag and also
running the floppy init async (since it takes forever in boot terms)
from Andi.
* 'for-3.6/drivers' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block:
floppy: remove duplicated flag FD_RAW_NEED_DISK
blk: pass from_schedule to non-request unplug functions.
block: stack unplug
blk: centralize non-request unplug handling.
md: remove plug_cnt feature of plugging.
block/nbd: micro-optimization in nbd request completion
drbd: announce FLUSH/FUA capability to upper layers
drbd: fix max_bio_size to be unsigned
drbd: flush drbd work queue before invalidate/invalidate remote
drbd: fix potential access after free
drbd: call local-io-error handler early
drbd: do not reset rs_pending_cnt too early
drbd: reset congestion information before reporting it in /proc/drbd
drbd: report congestion if we are waiting for some userland callback
drbd: differentiate between normal and forced detach
drbd: cleanup, remove two unused global flags
floppy: Run floppy initialization asynchronous
This seemed like a good idea at the time, but after further thought I
cannot see it making a difference other than very occasionally and
testing to try to exercise the case it is most likely to help did not
show any performance difference by removing it.
So remove the counting of active plugs and allow 'pending writes' to
be activated at any time, not just when no plugs are active.
This is only relevant when there is a write-intent bitmap, and the
updating of the bitmap will likely introduce enough delay that
the single-threading of bitmap updates will be enough to collect large
numbers of updates together.
Removing this will make it easier to centralise the unplug code, and
will clear the other for other unplug enhancements which have a
measurable effect.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
'sync' writes set both REQ_SYNC and REQ_NOIDLE.
O_DIRECT writes set REQ_SYNC but not REQ_NOIDLE.
We currently assume that a REQ_SYNC request will not be followed by
more requests and so set STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE to expedite the
request.
This is appropriate for sync requests, but not for O_DIRECT requests.
So make the setting of STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE conditional on REQ_NOIDLE
rather than REQ_SYNC. This is consistent with the documented meaning
of REQ_NOIDLE:
__REQ_NOIDLE, /* don't anticipate more IO after this one */
Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Because bios will merge at block-layer,so bios-error may caused by other
bio which be merged into to the same request.
Using this flag,it will find exactly error-sector and not do redundant
operation like re-write and re-read.
V0->V1:Using REQ_FLUSH instead REQ_NOMERGE avoid bio merging at block
layer.
Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Add a per-stripe lock to protect stripe specific data. The purpose is to reduce
lock contention of conf->device_lock.
stripe ->toread, ->towrite are protected by per-stripe lock. Accessing bio
list of the stripe is always serialized by this lock, so adding bio to the
lists (add_stripe_bio()) and removing bio from the lists (like
ops_run_biofill()) not race.
If bio in ->read, ->written ... list are not shared by multiple stripes, we
don't need any lock to protect ->read, ->written, because STRIPE_ACTIVE will
protect them. If the bio are shared, there are two protections:
1. bi_phys_segments acts as a reference count
2. traverse the list uses r5_next_bio, which makes traverse never access bio
not belonging to the stripe
Let's have an example:
| stripe1 | stripe2 | stripe3 |
...bio1......|bio2|bio3|....bio4.....
stripe2 has 4 bios, when it's finished, it will decrement bi_phys_segments for
all bios, but only end_bio for bio2 and bio3. bio1->bi_next still points to
bio2, but this doesn't matter. When stripe1 is finished, it will not touch bio2
because of r5_next_bio check. Next time stripe1 will end_bio for bio1 and
stripe3 will end_bio bio4.
before add_stripe_bio() addes a bio to a stripe, we already increament the bio
bi_phys_segments, so don't worry other stripes release the bio.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Neil pointed out the bitmap write optimization in handle_stripe_clean_event()
is unnecessary, because the chance one stripe gets written twice in the mean
time is rare. We can always do a bitmap_startwrite when a write request is
added to a stripe and bitmap_endwrite after write request is done. Delete the
optimization. With it, we can delete some cases of device_lock.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Raid5 overrides bio->bi_phys_segments, accessing it is with device_lock hold,
which is unnecessary, We can make it lockless actually.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
release_stripe() is a place conf->device_lock is heavily contended. We take the
lock even stripe count isn't 1, which isn't required.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The value returned by "mddev_check_plug" is only valid until the
next 'schedule' as that will unplug things. This could happen at any
call to mempool_alloc.
So just calling mddev_check_plug at the start doesn't really make
sense.
So call it just before, or just after, queuing things for the thread.
As the action that happens at unplug is to wake the thread, this makes
lots of sense.
If we cannot add a plug (which requires a small GFP_ATOMIC alloc) we
wake thread immediately.
RAID5 is a bit different. Requests are queued for the thread and the
thread is woken by release_stripe. So we don't need to wake the
thread on failure.
However the thread doesn't perform certain actions when there is any
active plug, so it is important to install a plug before waking the
thread. So for RAID5 we install the plug *before* queuing the request
and waking the thread.
Without this patch it is possible for raid1 or raid10 to queue a
request without then waking the thread, resulting in the array locking
up.
Also change raid10 to only flush_pending_write when there are not
active plugs, just like raid1.
This patch is suitable for 3.0 or later. I plan to submit it to
-stable, but I'll like to let it spend a few weeks in mainline
first to be sure it is completely safe.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
There isn't locking setting STRIPE_DELAYED and STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE bits, but
the two bits have relationship. A delayed stripe can be moved to hold list only
when preread active stripe count is below IO_THRESHOLD. If a stripe has both
the bits set, such stripe will be in delayed list and preread count not 0,
which will make such stripe never leave delayed list.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
We may not be able to fix a bad block if:
- the array is degraded
- the over-write fails.
In these cases we currently eject the device, but we should
record a bad block if possible.
Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Having the 'name' arg optional and defaulting to the current
personality name is no necessary and leads to errors, as when
changing the level of an array we can end up using the
name of the old level instead of the new one.
So make it non-optional and always explicitly pass the name
of the level that the array will be.
Reported-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
commit 43220aa0f2
md/raid5: fix a hang on device failure.
fixed a hang, but introduced a refcounting in-balance so
that if the presence of bad-blocks ever caused an rdev to
be 'blocked' we would increment the refcount on the rdev and
never decrement it.
So added the needed rdev_dec_pending when md_wait_for_blocked_rdev
is not called.
Reported-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
In ops_run_io(), the call to md_wait_for_blocked_rdev will decrement
nr_pending so we lose the reference we hold on the rdev.
So atomic_inc it first to maintain the reference.
This bug was introduced by commit 73e92e51b7
md/raid5. Don't write to known bad block on doubtful devices.
which appeared in 3.0, so patch is suitable for stable kernels since
then.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
In chunk_aligned_read() we are adding data_offset before calling
is_badblock. But is_badblock also adds data_offset, so that is bad.
So move the addition of data_offset to after the call to
is_badblock.
This bug was introduced by commit 31c176ecdf
md/raid5: avoid reading from known bad blocks.
which first appeared in 3.0. So that patch is suitable for any
-stable kernel from 3.0.y onwards. However it will need minor
revision for most of those (as the comment didn't appear until
recently).
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
If a RAID5 has both a failed device and a device marked as
'WantReplacement', then we should preferentially replace the failed
device.
However the current code replaces whichever is found first.
So split into 2 loops, check fail failed/missing first, and only check
for WantReplacement if nothing is failed or missing.
Reported-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
After a reshape which reduced the number of devices we need
to disconnect the extra devices.
The code for this doesn't currently handle 'replacement' devices.
It is very unlikely that such devices will be present, but it is
safest to handle them anyway.
So simplify the handling. Just clear In_sync and leave it
to remove_and_add_spaces (which will be called soon) to do
the real works.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
We always should have allowed this. A raid5 reshape doesn't change
the size of the bitmap, so not need to restrict it.
Also add a test to make sure we don't try to start a reshape on a
failed array.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Now that bitmaps can be resized, we can allow an array to be resized
while the bitmap is present.
This only covers resizing that involves changing the effective size
of member devices, not resizing that changes the number of devices.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
REQ_SYNC is ignored in current raid5 code. Block layer does use it to do
policy,
for example ioscheduler. This patch adds it.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The important issue here is incorporating the different in data_offset
into calculations concerning when we might need to over-write data
that is still thought to be valid.
To this end we find the minimum offset difference across all devices
and add that where appropriate.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
As there can now be two different data_offsets - an 'old' and
a 'new' - we need to carefully choose between them.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When reshaping we can avoid costly intermediate backup by
changing the 'start' address of the array on the device
(if there is enough room).
So as a first step, allow such a change to be requested
through sysfs, and recorded in v1.x metadata.
(As we didn't previous check that all 'pad' fields were zero,
we need a new FEATURE flag for this.
A (belatedly) check that all remaining 'pad' fields are
zero to avoid a repeat of this)
The new data offset must be requested separately for each device.
This allows each to have a different change in the data offset.
This is not likely to be used often but as data_offset can be
set per-device, new_data_offset should be too.
This patch also removes the 'acknowledged' arg to rdev_set_badblocks as
it is never used and never will be. At the same time we add a new
arg ('in_new') which is currently always zero but will be used more
soon.
When a reshape finishes we will need to update the data_offset
and rdev->sectors. So provide an exported function to do that.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Currently a reshape operation always progresses from the start
of the array to the end unless the number of devices is being
reduced, in which case it progressed in the opposite direction.
To reverse a partial reshape which changes the number of devices
you can stop the array and re-assemble with the raid-disks numbers
reversed and it will undo.
However for a reshape that does not change the number of devices
it is not possible to reverse the reshape in the middle - you have to
wait until it completes.
So add a 'reshape_direction' attribute with is either 'forwards' or
'backwards' and can be explicitly set when delta_disks is zero.
This will become more important when we allow the data_offset to
change in a reshape. Then the explicit statement of what direction is
being used will be more useful.
This can be enabled in raid5 trivially as it already supports
reverse reshape and just needs to use a different trigger to request it.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When create a raid5 using assume-clean and echo check or repair to
sync_action.Then component disks did not operated IO but the raid
check/resync faster than normal.
Because the judgement in function analyse_stripe():
if (do_recovery ||
sh->sector >= conf->mddev->recovery_cp)
s->syncing = 1;
else
s->replacing = 1;
When check or repair,the recovery_cp == MaxSectore,so syncing equal zero
not one.
This bug was introduced by commit 9a3e1101b8
md/raid5: detect and handle replacements during recovery.
so this patch is suitable for 3.3-stable.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
1/ We can only treat a known-bad-block like a read-error if we
have the data that belongs in that block. So fix that test.
2/ If we cannot recovery a stripe due to insufficient data,
don't tell "md_done_sync" that the sync failed unless we really
did fail something. If we successfully record bad blocks,
that is success.
Reported-by: "majianpeng" <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
md.h has an 'rdev_for_each()' macro for iterating the rdevs in an
mddev. However it uses the 'safe' version of list_for_each_entry,
and so requires the extra variable, but doesn't include 'safe' in the
name, which is useful documentation.
Consequently some places use this safe version without needing it, and
many use an explicity list_for_each entry.
So:
- rename rdev_for_each to rdev_for_each_safe
- create a new rdev_for_each which uses the plain
list_for_each_entry,
- use the 'safe' version only where needed, and convert all other
list_for_each_entry calls to use rdev_for_each.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When an array is failed (some data inaccessible) then there is no
point attempting to add a spare as it could not possibly be recovered.
However that may be value in re-adding a recently removed device.
e.g. if there is a write-intent-bitmap and it is clear, then access
to the data could be restored by this action.
So don't reject a re-add to a failed array for RAID10 and RAID5 (the
only arrays types that check for a failed array).
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Now that WantReplacement drives are replaced cleanly, mark a drive
as WantReplacement when we see a write error. It might get failed soon so
the WantReplacement flag is irrelevant, but if the write error is recorded
in the bad block log, we still want to activate any spare that might
be available.
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When attempting to add a spare to a RAID[456] array, also consider
adding it as a replacement for a want_replacement device.
This requires that common md code attempt hot_add even when the array
is not formally degraded.
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Linus Torvalds