There is a comment here which says that DIV_ROUND_UP() and that's where
the problem comes from. Say you pick:
args->bpp = UINT_MAX - 7;
args->width = 4;
args->height = 1;
The integer overflow in DIV_ROUND_UP() means "cpp" is UINT_MAX / 8 and
because of how we picked args->width that means cpp < UINT_MAX / 4.
I've fixed it by preventing the integer overflow in DIV_ROUND_UP(). I
removed the check for !cpp because it's not possible after this change.
I also changed all the 0xffffffffU references to U32_MAX.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180516140026.GA19340@mwanda
I just learned that &struct_name.member_name works and looks pretty
even. It doesn't (yet) link to the member directly though, which would
be really good for big structures or vfunc tables (where the
per-member kerneldoc tends to be long).
Also some minor drive-by polish where it makes sense, I read a lot
of docs ...
v2: Review from Eric.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170125062657.19270-4-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
sed -e 's/\( \* .*\)struct &\([_a-z]*\)/\1\&struct \2/' -i
Originally I wasnt a friend of this style because I thought a
line-break between the "&struct" and "foo" part would break it. But a
quick test shows that " * &struct \n * foo\n" works pefectly well with
current kernel-doc. So time to mass-apply these changes!
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1483044517-5770-6-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Dan Carpenter