Remove code that is not needed and always allow MIMO when
in tight mode. In loose mode, we should avoid MIMO since BT
can use the other antenna to Rx while we Tx.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Tests have shown that we should go SMSP_STATIC when BT
traffic is high, and stay in dynamic if BT traffic is low.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
BT Coex needs to be updated when the bandwidth is modified
by the AP.
While at it, remove the vif parameter from
bt_coex_vif_change since it was unused.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Single shared antenna devices need a special LUT.
Address this need.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
In loose BT Coex scheme, the aggregation size doesn't need to
be limited.
To avoid triggering it, remove a lockdep assertion - we need
to compute the AMPDU size limit from rate control code which
can't take mvm->mutex. This means that there is a race but in
the worst case, we will have a wrong AMPDU size limit which
is not a big issue.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Rssi events were enabled on interfaces using 5.2GHz.
Interfaces on 5.2GHz were taken into account while
determining the ACK / CTS kill mask. Fix that.
The last rssi notified to BT Coex was reset every BT Coex
Notification. Since we get a lot of these notifications
from the firmware, we reset the rssi all the time which
means that the bt_rssi_event is called all the time.
Fix that by puting the rssi we pull upon BT Coex
notification into iwl_mvm_vif_bf_data.last_bt_coex_event
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
When we have only one antenna for BT and WiFi, reduced Tx
power is irrelevant.
Also, in loose scheme, we should not use reduced Tx power
nor set the control mask to Tx power.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
The data in MailBox comes direclty from the BT core.
We should use the data processed by the WiFi fw that is
appended to the MailBox in the BT Coex notification.
Also decide on whether the Coex type based on the input
from the the firmware and not hard coded.
Also fix the SMPS SISO threshold to 2 (it was 3).
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This was due to a fw remainder of old implementation.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This is the new API for BT Coex. The full functionality
will be implemented in further patches.
Note: this disables BT Coex for the currently existing
fw (-7 version).
There is also a new command - the channel inhibition command.
This command tells BT what channels to avoid in order to
minimise the interaction between BT and WiFi.
We can tell BT about 2 channels, primary and secondary.
BT will not tune to primary at all and will avoid secondary
as much as possible.
This also means that we need to track vifs that AP / GO.
So rename iwl_mvm_bt_coex_vif_assoc to
iwl_mvm_bt_coex_vif_change to better reflect its real
meaning.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This will deadlock due to commit 9f34783863bea806
("iwlwifi: mvm: Implement BT coex notifications"):
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
3.5.0 #10 Tainted: G W O
---------------------------------------------
kworker/2:1/5214 is trying to acquire lock:
(&mvm->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa03be23e>] iwl_mvm_bt_rssi_event+0x5e/0x210 [iwlmvm]
but task is already holding lock:
(&mvm->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa03ab2d9>] iwl_mvm_async_handlers_wk+0x49/0x120 [iwlmvm]
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&mvm->mutex);
lock(&mvm->mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
Change-Id: I9104f252b34676e2f7ffcd51166f95367e08a4d9
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.rds.intel.com/21887
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Tested-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Conflicts:
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/bt-coex.c
Use beacon statistics notification handler
to notify bt coex about rssi changes.
Mac80211's mechanism is not used anymore.
Signed-off-by: Andrei Otcheretianski <andrei.otcheretianski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This command will change and be much bigger.
Prepare to that by stop allocating on the stack.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
If a vif's RSSI gets good enough, we can enable reduced
Tx power. If so, we need to update the ACK / CTS kill mask
accordingly. Since the auditing for the interfaces was bad,
we enabled reduced Tx power, but didn't update the ACK / CTS
kill mask.
This is harmless since the firmware is most likely to
discard this setting anyway, but it is a good practice
to update it.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
When there one vif on 5GHz associating, it would clear all
the BT Coex constraints. This can't work if there is
another vif on 2.4GHz. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
1x1 products will need a special LUT.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
There was a typo in the Loose LUT for BT Coex.
Fix that.
Reported-by: Roi Cohen <roi.cohen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
In order to avoid NIC destruction due to high temperature,
CT kill will power down the NIC.
To avoid this, thermal throttling will decrease throughput
to prevent the NIC from reaching the temperature at which
CT kill is performed.
Signed-off-by: Eytan Lifshitz <eytan.lifshitz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
It actually handles a BT coex notification, so rename it
to be more self explained.
Also, this function can always look at mvm->last_bt_notif
provided that the latter is updated on time.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
The iterators don't need to know what bt_kill_msk means.
All they need to know is if reduced Tx power is enabled
on an interface or not. So change the member of the
iterator to be a bool.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
When we roam to A band, we don't need to constraint WiFi
any more since it is operating on a different band.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This allows to have better wifi TPT when BT is active under
good RSSI conditions.
Wifi will have better chance to send Acks and Cts even if BT
is active.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This module parameter isn't and won't be used. So ignore
its value and set BT_CH_ANNOUNCE unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
We should disable MIMO only if bt_traffic_load goes up to 3.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This feature is not implemented yet in firmware.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
The masks were wrong. They should be 0xffffffff when SCO,
HID or SNIFF profiles are used. They should be 0xffff0000
in any other case (default) to get a bit more throughput
when the BT profile allows for it.
Fix a debug print on the way.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This will allow to track how BT core updates the driver.
This is required to debug the BT Coexistence mechanism.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
When BT traffic load gets higher, we want to avoid using the
shared antenna. In order to do so, we need to tell the AP
that we don't support MIMO any more, or at least not all
the time: in short, use the SMPS to achieve this.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
The BT-Coex notification is sent by the fw when there are
updates wrt. BT activity. Driver action might be taken
based on the info in this notification.
For now, update the Ack/Cts_kill_msk if HID / SCO / A2DP
profiles are active.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Send the PRIO table before the calibrations. This table
tells the fw what priority to give to what (WiFi / BT)
according to events.
Send a hardcoded BT_COEX command to the fw to enable basic
BT coexistence.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Emmanuel Grumbach