Rename a couple of the struct psw_bits members so it is more obvious
for what they are good. Initially I thought using the single character
names from the PoP would be sufficient and obvious, but admittedly
that is not true.
The current implementation is not easy to use, if one has to look into
the source file to figure out which member represents the 'per' bit
(which is the 'r' member).
Therefore rename the members to sane names that are identical to the
uapi psw mask defines:
r -> per
i -> io
e -> ext
t -> dat
m -> mcheck
w -> wait
p -> pstate
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
The address space enums that must be used when modifying the address
space part of a psw with the psw_bits() macro can easily be confused
with the psw defines that are used to mask and compare directly the
mask part of a psw.
We have e.g. PSW_AS_PRIMARY vs PSW_ASC_PRIMARY.
To avoid confusion rename the PSW_AS_* enums to PSW_BITS_AS_*.
In addition also rename the PSW_AMODE_* enums, so they also follow the
same naming scheme: PSW_BITS_AMODE_*.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
We are going to split <linux/sched/task_stack.h> out of <linux/sched.h>, which
will have to be picked up from other headers and a couple of .c files.
Create a trivial placeholder <linux/sched/task_stack.h> file that just
maps to <linux/sched.h> to make this patch obviously correct and
bisectable.
Include the new header in the files that are going to need it.
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Remove __user address space annotation for sim_stor_event() calls since it
generates false positive warnings from sparse.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
If uprobes are single stepped for example with gdb, the behavior should
now be correct. Before this patch, when gdb was single stepping a uprobe,
the result was a SIGILL.
When PER is active for any storage alteration and a uprobe is hit, a storage
alteration event is indicated. These over indications are filterd out by gdb,
if no change has happened within the observed area.
Signed-off-by: Jan Willeke <willeke@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
If kprobes is disabled uprobes will not compile.
Fix this by including the correct header files.
Signed-off-by: Jan Willeke <willeke@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Heiko Carstens