gc_gen was a temporary used to recalculate last_gc, but since we only need
bucket->last_gc when gc isn't running (gc_mark_valid = 1), we can just update
last_gc directly.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
This was originally added as at optimization that for various reasons isn't
needed anymore, but it does add a lot of nasty corner cases (and it was
responsible for some recently fixed bugs). Just get rid of it now.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
This changes the bucket allocation reserves to use _real_ reserves - separate
freelists - instead of watermarks, which if nothing else makes the current code
saner to reason about and is going to be important in the future when we add
support for multiple btrees.
It also adds btree_check_reserve(), which checks (and locks) the reserves for
both bucket allocation and memory allocation for btree nodes; the old code just
kinda sorta assumed that since (e.g. for btree node splits) it had the root
locked and that meant no other threads could try to make use of the same
reserve; this technically should have been ok for memory allocation (we should
always have a reserve for memory allocation (the btree node cache is used as a
reserve and we preallocate it)), but multiple btrees will mean that locking the
root won't be sufficient anymore, and for the bucket allocation reserve it was
technically possible for the old code to deadlock.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
With the locking rework in the last patch, this shouldn't be needed anymore -
btree_node_write_work() only takes b->write_lock which is never held for very
long.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Add a new lock, b->write_lock, which is required to actually modify - or write -
a btree node; this lock is only held for short durations.
This means we can write out a btree node without taking b->lock, which _is_ held
for long durations - solving a deadlock when btree_flush_write() (from the
journalling code) is called with a btree node locked.
Right now just occurs in bch_btree_set_root(), but with an upcoming journalling
rework is going to happen a lot more.
This also turns b->lock is now more of a read/intent lock instead of a
read/write lock - but not completely, since it still blocks readers. May turn it
into a real intent lock at some point in the future.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Deadlock happened because a foreground write slept, waiting for a bucket
to be allocated. Normally the gc would mark buckets available for invalidation.
But the moving_gc was stuck waiting for outstanding writes to complete.
These writes used the bcache_wq, the same queue foreground writes used.
This fix gives moving_gc its own work queue, so it was still finish moving
even if foreground writes are stuck waiting for allocation. It also makes
work queue a parameter to the data_insert path, so moving_gc can use its
workqueue for writes.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Swenson <nks@daterainc.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
More disentangling bset.c from the rest of the bcache code - soon, the
sorting routines won't have any dependencies on any outside structs.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Now that we've got code for raid5/6 stripe awareness, bcache just needs
to know about the stripes and when writing partial stripes is expensive
- we probably don't want to enable this optimization for raid1 or 10,
even though they have stripes. So add a flag to queue_limits.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
We need a reserve for allocating buckets for new btree nodes - and now that
we've got multiple btrees, it really needs to be per btree.
This reworks the reserves so we've got separate freelists for each reserve
instead of watermarks, which seems to make things a bit cleaner, and it adds
some code so that btree_split() can make sure the reserve is available before it
starts.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAABAgAGBQJSwLfoAAoJEHm+PkMAQRiGi6QH/1U1B7lmHChDTw3jj1lfm9gA
189Si4QJlnxFWCKHvKEL+pcaVuACU+aMGI8+KyMYK4/JfuWVjjj5fr/SvyHH2/8m
LdSK8aHMhJ46uBS4WJ/l6v46qQa5e2vn8RKSBAyKm/h4vpt+hd6zJdoFrFai4th7
k/TAwOAEHI5uzexUChwLlUBRTvbq4U8QUvDu+DeifC8cT63CGaaJ4qVzjOZrx1an
eP6UXZrKDASZs7RU950i7xnFVDQu4PsjlZi25udsbeiKcZJgPqGgXz5ULf8ZH8RQ
YCi1JOnTJRGGjyIOyLj7pyB01h7XiSM2+eMQ0S7g54F2s7gCJ58c2UwQX45vRWU=
=/4/R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'v3.13-rc6' into for-3.14/core
Needed to bring blk-mq uptodate, since changes have been going in
since for-3.14/core was established.
Fixup merge issues related to the immutable biovec changes.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Conflicts:
block/blk-flush.c
fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
fs/btrfs/scrub.c
fs/logfs/dev_bdev.c
Bcache has a hack to avoid cloning the biovec if it's all full pages -
but with immutable biovecs coming this won't be necessary anymore.
For now, we remove the special case and always clone the bvec array so
that the immutable biovec patches are simpler.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Just to be safe, call the error reporting function with "%s" to avoid
any possible future format string leak.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Trying to treat btree pointers and leaf node pointers the same way was a
mistake - going to start being more explicit about the type of
key/pointer we're dealing with. This is the first part of that
refactoring; this patch shouldn't change any actual behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
The bucket refcount (dropped with bkey_put()) is only needed to prevent
the newly allocated bucket from being garbage collected until we've
added a pointer to it somewhere. But for btree node allocations, the
fact that we have btree nodes locked is enough to guard against races
with garbage collection.
Eventually the per bucket refcount is going to be replaced with
something specific to bch_alloc_sectors().
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Now, the on disk data structures are in a header that can be exported to
userspace - and having them all centralized is nice too.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
This simplifies the writeback flow control quite a bit - previously, it
was conceptually two coroutines, refill_dirty() and read_dirty(). This
makes the code quite a bit more straightforward.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
We needed a dedicated rescuer workqueue for gc anyways... and gc was
conceptually a dedicated thread, just one that wasn't running all the
time. Switch it to a dedicated thread to make the code a bit more
straightforward.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
At one point we did do fancy asynchronous waiting stuff with
bucket_wait, but that's all gone (and bucket_wait is used a lot less
than it used to be). So use the standard primitives.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Originally I got this right... except that the divides didn't use
do_div(), which broke 32 bit kernels. When I went to fix that, I forgot
that the raid stripe size usually isn't a power of two... doh
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
The old asynchronous discard code was really a relic from when all the
allocation code was asynchronous - now that allocation runs out of a
dedicated thread there's no point in keeping around all that complicated
machinery.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
The alloc kthread should've been using try_to_freeze() - and also there
was the potential for the alloc kthread to get woken up after it had
shut down, which would have been bad.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Stopping a cache set is supposed to make it stop attached backing
devices, but somewhere along the way that code got lost. Fixing this
mainly has the effect of fixing our reboot notifier.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Cc: linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # >= v3.10
If we stopped a bcache device when we were already detaching (or
something like that), bcache_device_unlink() would try to remove a
symlink from sysfs that was already gone because the bcache dev kobject
had already been removed from sysfs.
So keep track of whether we've removed stuff from sysfs.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Cc: linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # >= v3.10
Whoops - bcache's flush/FUA was mostly correct, but flushes get filtered
out unless we say we support them...
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Cc: linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # >= v3.10
To make background writeback aware of raid5/6 stripes, we first need to
track the amount of dirty data within each stripe - we do this by
breaking up the existing sectors_dirty into per stripe atomic_ts
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
Previously, dirty_data wouldn't get initialized until the first garbage
collection... which was a bit of a problem for background writeback (as
the PD controller keys off of it) and also confusing for users.
This is also prep work for making background writeback aware of raid5/6
stripes.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
The old lazy sorting code was kind of hacky - rewrite in a way that
mathematically makes more sense; the idea is that the size of the sets
of keys in a btree node should increase by a more or less fixed ratio
from smallest to biggest.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
Old gcc doesnt like the struct hack, and it is kind of ugly. So finish
off the work to convert pr_debug() statements to tracepoints, and delete
pkey()/pbtree().
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
Kent Overstreet