The 32-bit ARM port doesn't have ACPI headers, and conditionally
including them is going to look horrendous. In preparation for sharing
the PSCI invocation code with 32-bit, move the acpi_psci_* function
declarations and definitions such that the PSCI client code need not
include ACPI headers.
While it would seem like we could simply hide the ACPI includes in
psci.h, the ACPI headers have hilarious circular dependencies which make
this infeasible without reorganising most of ACPICA. So rather than
doing that, move the acpi_psci_* prototypes into psci.h.
The psci_acpi_init function is made dependent on CONFIG_ACPI (with a
stub implementation in asm/psci.h) such that it need not be built for
32-bit ARM or kernels without ACPI support. The currently missing __init
annotations are added to the prototypes in the header.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
The code that initializes cpus on arm64 is currently split in two
different code paths that carry out DT and ACPI cpus initialization.
Most of the code executing SMP initialization is common and should
be merged to reduce discrepancies between ACPI and DT initialization
and to have code initializing cpus in a single common place in the
kernel.
This patch refactors arm64 SMP cpus initialization code to merge
ACPI and DT boot paths in a common file and to create sanity
checks that can be reused by both boot methods.
Current code assumes PSCI is the only available boot method
when arm64 boots with ACPI; this can be easily extended if/when
the ACPI parking protocol is merged into the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [DT]
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
ARM64 CPU operations such as cpu_init and cpu_init_idle take
a struct device_node pointer as a parameter, which corresponds to
the device tree node of the logical cpu on which the operation
has to be applied.
With the advent of ACPI on arm64, where MADT static table entries
are used to initialize cpus, the device tree node parameter
in cpu_ops hooks become useless when booting with ACPI, since
in that case cpu device tree nodes are not present and can not be
used for cpu initialization.
The current cpu_init hook requires a struct device_node pointer
parameter because it is called while parsing the device tree to
initialize CPUs, when the cpu_logical_map (that is used to match
a cpu node reg property to a device tree node) for a given logical
cpu id is not set up yet. This means that the cpu_init hook cannot
rely on the of_get_cpu_node function to retrieve the device tree
node corresponding to the logical cpu id passed in as parameter,
so the cpu device tree node must be passed in as a parameter to fix
this catch-22 dependency cycle.
This patch reshuffles the cpu_logical_map initialization code so
that the cpu_init cpu_ops hook can safely use the of_get_cpu_node
function to retrieve the cpu device tree node, removing the need for
the device tree node pointer parameter.
In the process, the patch removes device tree node parameters
from all cpu_ops hooks, in preparation for SMP DT/ACPI cpus
initialization consolidation.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [DT]
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Since the only caller of acpi_parse_gic_cpu_interface() doesn't
need the return value, make it have a void return type to avoid
introducing subtle bugs, and update the comments of the function
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
MADT scanning will stop when it gets an error from the handler,
acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface(), on arm64. However, we need to
find all of the enabled CPUs so that SMP initialization can work
properly. So, if an error occurs in this case, ignore it for
now so that we can find all of the enabled CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
acpi_parse_gic_cpu_interface calls acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface by both
passing a 32-bit value in the u8 enabled parameter and then subsequently
ignoring its return value.
Sort it out.
Reported-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
If acpi=force is passed on the command line, it forces ACPI to be
the only available boot method, hence it must be left enabled even
if the initialization and sanity checks on ACPI tables fails.
This patch refactors ACPI initialization to prevent disabling ACPI
if acpi=force is passed on the command line.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Current ACPI init code on ARM64 relies on acpi_table_parse() API to
check if the FADT is present and to carry out sanity checks on that.
The handler passed to the acpi_table_parse() function and used to
carry out the parsing on the requested table returns a value that is
ignored by the acpi_table_parse() function, so it is not possible
to propagate errors back to the acpi_table_parse() caller through
the handler.
This forces ARM64 ACPI init code to have disable_acpi() calls scattered
all over the place that makes code unwieldy and not easy to follow.
This patch refactors the ARM64 ACPI init code, by creating a
self-contained function (ie acpi_fadt_sanity_check()) that carries
out the required checks on FADT and returns an adequate return value
to the caller. This allows creating a common error path that disables
ACPI and makes code more readable and easy to parse and change were
further checks FADT to be added in the future.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
The code deployed to implement GSI linux IRQ numbers mapping on arm64 turns
out to be generic enough so that it can be moved to ACPI core code along
with its respective config option ACPI_GENERIC_GSI selectable on
architectures that can reuse the same code.
Current ACPI IRQ mapping code is not integrated in the kernel IRQ domain
infrastructure, in particular there is no way to look-up the
IRQ domain associated with a particular interrupt controller, so this
first version of GSI generic code carries out the GSI<->IRQ mapping relying
on the IRQ default domain which is supposed to be always set on a
specific architecture in case the domain structure passed to
irq_create/find_mapping() functions is missing.
This patch moves the arm64 acpi functions that implement the gsi mappings:
acpi_gsi_to_irq()
acpi_register_gsi()
acpi_unregister_gsi()
to ACPI core code. Since the generic GSI<->domain mapping is based on IRQ
domains, it can be extended as soon as a way to map an interrupt
controller to an IRQ domain is implemented for ACPI in the IRQ domain
layer.
x86 and ia64 code for GSI mappings cannot rely on the generic GSI
layer at present for legacy reasons, so they do not select the
ACPI_GENERIC_GSI config options and keep relying on their arch
specific GSI mapping layer.
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Since the policy is that once we pass acpi=force in the early
param, we will not unflatten device tree even if ACPI is disabled
in ACPI table init fails, so fix the code by comparinging both
acpi_disabled and param_acpi_force before the device tree is
unflattened.
CC: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
ACPI reduced hardware mode is disabled by default, but ARM64
can only run properly in ACPI hardware reduced mode, so select
ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY if ACPI is enabled on ARM64.
If the firmware is not using hardware reduced ACPI mode, we
will disable ACPI to avoid nightmare such as accessing some
registers which are not available on ARM64.
CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Tested-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>
Acked-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
ACPI kernel uses MADT table for proper GIC initialization. It needs to
parse GIC related subtables, collect CPU interface and distributor
addresses and call driver initialization function (which is hardware
abstraction agnostic). In a similar way, FDT initialize GICv1/2.
NOTE: This commit allow to initialize GICv1/2 basic functionality.
While now simple GICv2 init call is used, any further GIC features
require generic infrastructure for proper ACPI irqchip initialization.
That mechanism and stacked irqdomains to support GICv2 MSI/virtualization
extension, GICv3/4 and its ITS are considered as next steps.
CC: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
CC: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Tested-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>
Acked-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Reviewed-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Introduce ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC which is needed for ARM64 as GIC is
used, and then register device's gsi with the core IRQ subsystem.
acpi_register_gsi() is similar to DT based irq_of_parse_and_map(),
since gsi is unique in the system, so use hwirq number directly
for the mapping.
We are going to implement stacked domains when GICv2m, GICv3, ITS
support are added.
CC: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Originally-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Tested-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>
Acked-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
MADT contains the information for MPIDR which is essential for
SMP initialization, parse the GIC cpu interface structures to
get the MPIDR value and map it to cpu_logical_map(), and add
enabled cpu with valid MPIDR into cpu_possible_map.
ACPI 5.1 only has two explicit methods to boot up SMP, PSCI and
Parking protocol, but the Parking protocol is only specified for
ARMv7 now, so make PSCI as the only way for the SMP boot protocol
before some updates for the ACPI spec or the Parking protocol spec.
Parking protocol patches for SMP boot will be sent to upstream when
the new version of Parking protocol is ready.
CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Tested-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>
Acked-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>
Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Reviewed-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
This implements the following policy to decide whether ACPI should
be used to boot the system:
- acpi=off: ACPI will not be used to boot the system, even if there is
no alternative available (e.g., device tree is empty)
- acpi=force: only ACPI will be used to boot the system; if that fails,
there will be no fallback to alternative methods (such as device tree)
- otherwise, ACPI will be used as a fallback if the device tree turns out
to lack a platform description; the heuristic to decide this is whether
/chosen is the only node present at depth 1
CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
As we want to get ACPI tables to parse and then use the information
for system initialization, we should get the RSDP (Root System
Description Pointer) first, it then locates Extended Root Description
Table (XSDT) which contains all the 64-bit physical address that
pointer to other boot-time tables.
Introduce acpi.c and its related head file in this patch to provide
fundamental needs of extern variables and functions for ACPI core,
and then get boot-time tables as needed.
- asm/acenv.h for arch specific ACPICA environments and
implementation, It is needed unconditionally by ACPI core;
- asm/acpi.h for arch specific variables and functions needed by
ACPI driver core;
- acpi.c for ARM64 related ACPI implementation for ACPI driver
core;
acpi_boot_table_init() is introduced to get RSDP and boot-time tables,
it will be called in setup_arch() before paging_init(), so we should
use eary_memremap() mechanism here to get the RSDP and all the table
pointers.
FADT Major.Minor version was introduced in ACPI 5.1, it is the same
as ACPI version.
In ACPI 5.1, some major gaps are fixed for ARM, such as updates in
MADT table for GIC and SMP init, without those updates, we can not
get the MPIDR for SMP init, and GICv2/3 related init information, so
we can't boot arm64 ACPI properly with table versions predating 5.1.
If firmware provides ACPI tables with ACPI version less than 5.1,
OS has no way to retrieve the configuration data that is necessary
to init SMP boot protocol and the GIC properly, so disable ACPI if
we get an FADT table with version less that 5.1 when acpi_boot_table_init()
called.
CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Tested-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>
Acked-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>
Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Mark Rutland