mirror of https://gitee.com/openkylin/linux.git
253 lines
11 KiB
ReStructuredText
253 lines
11 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
|
|
|
|
===========================================
|
|
Intel(R) Memory Protection Extensions (MPX)
|
|
===========================================
|
|
|
|
Intel(R) MPX Overview
|
|
=====================
|
|
|
|
Intel(R) Memory Protection Extensions (Intel(R) MPX) is a new capability
|
|
introduced into Intel Architecture. Intel MPX provides hardware features
|
|
that can be used in conjunction with compiler changes to check memory
|
|
references, for those references whose compile-time normal intentions are
|
|
usurped at runtime due to buffer overflow or underflow.
|
|
|
|
You can tell if your CPU supports MPX by looking in /proc/cpuinfo::
|
|
|
|
cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep ' mpx '
|
|
|
|
For more information, please refer to Intel(R) Architecture Instruction
|
|
Set Extensions Programming Reference, Chapter 9: Intel(R) Memory Protection
|
|
Extensions.
|
|
|
|
Note: As of December 2014, no hardware with MPX is available but it is
|
|
possible to use SDE (Intel(R) Software Development Emulator) instead, which
|
|
can be downloaded from
|
|
http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-software-development-emulator
|
|
|
|
|
|
How to get the advantage of MPX
|
|
===============================
|
|
|
|
For MPX to work, changes are required in the kernel, binutils and compiler.
|
|
No source changes are required for applications, just a recompile.
|
|
|
|
There are a lot of moving parts of this to all work right. The following
|
|
is how we expect the compiler, application and kernel to work together.
|
|
|
|
1) Application developer compiles with -fmpx. The compiler will add the
|
|
instrumentation as well as some setup code called early after the app
|
|
starts. New instruction prefixes are noops for old CPUs.
|
|
2) That setup code allocates (virtual) space for the "bounds directory",
|
|
points the "bndcfgu" register to the directory (must also set the valid
|
|
bit) and notifies the kernel (via the new prctl(PR_MPX_ENABLE_MANAGEMENT))
|
|
that the app will be using MPX. The app must be careful not to access
|
|
the bounds tables between the time when it populates "bndcfgu" and
|
|
when it calls the prctl(). This might be hard to guarantee if the app
|
|
is compiled with MPX. You can add "__attribute__((bnd_legacy))" to
|
|
the function to disable MPX instrumentation to help guarantee this.
|
|
Also be careful not to call out to any other code which might be
|
|
MPX-instrumented.
|
|
3) The kernel detects that the CPU has MPX, allows the new prctl() to
|
|
succeed, and notes the location of the bounds directory. Userspace is
|
|
expected to keep the bounds directory at that location. We note it
|
|
instead of reading it each time because the 'xsave' operation needed
|
|
to access the bounds directory register is an expensive operation.
|
|
4) If the application needs to spill bounds out of the 4 registers, it
|
|
issues a bndstx instruction. Since the bounds directory is empty at
|
|
this point, a bounds fault (#BR) is raised, the kernel allocates a
|
|
bounds table (in the user address space) and makes the relevant entry
|
|
in the bounds directory point to the new table.
|
|
5) If the application violates the bounds specified in the bounds registers,
|
|
a separate kind of #BR is raised which will deliver a signal with
|
|
information about the violation in the 'struct siginfo'.
|
|
6) Whenever memory is freed, we know that it can no longer contain valid
|
|
pointers, and we attempt to free the associated space in the bounds
|
|
tables. If an entire table becomes unused, we will attempt to free
|
|
the table and remove the entry in the directory.
|
|
|
|
To summarize, there are essentially three things interacting here:
|
|
|
|
GCC with -fmpx:
|
|
* enables annotation of code with MPX instructions and prefixes
|
|
* inserts code early in the application to call in to the "gcc runtime"
|
|
GCC MPX Runtime:
|
|
* Checks for hardware MPX support in cpuid leaf
|
|
* allocates virtual space for the bounds directory (malloc() essentially)
|
|
* points the hardware BNDCFGU register at the directory
|
|
* calls a new prctl(PR_MPX_ENABLE_MANAGEMENT) to notify the kernel to
|
|
start managing the bounds directories
|
|
Kernel MPX Code:
|
|
* Checks for hardware MPX support in cpuid leaf
|
|
* Handles #BR exceptions and sends SIGSEGV to the app when it violates
|
|
bounds, like during a buffer overflow.
|
|
* When bounds are spilled in to an unallocated bounds table, the kernel
|
|
notices in the #BR exception, allocates the virtual space, then
|
|
updates the bounds directory to point to the new table. It keeps
|
|
special track of the memory with a VM_MPX flag.
|
|
* Frees unused bounds tables at the time that the memory they described
|
|
is unmapped.
|
|
|
|
|
|
How does MPX kernel code work
|
|
=============================
|
|
|
|
Handling #BR faults caused by MPX
|
|
---------------------------------
|
|
|
|
When MPX is enabled, there are 2 new situations that can generate
|
|
#BR faults.
|
|
|
|
* new bounds tables (BT) need to be allocated to save bounds.
|
|
* bounds violation caused by MPX instructions.
|
|
|
|
We hook #BR handler to handle these two new situations.
|
|
|
|
On-demand kernel allocation of bounds tables
|
|
--------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
MPX only has 4 hardware registers for storing bounds information. If
|
|
MPX-enabled code needs more than these 4 registers, it needs to spill
|
|
them somewhere. It has two special instructions for this which allow
|
|
the bounds to be moved between the bounds registers and some new "bounds
|
|
tables".
|
|
|
|
#BR exceptions are a new class of exceptions just for MPX. They are
|
|
similar conceptually to a page fault and will be raised by the MPX
|
|
hardware during both bounds violations or when the tables are not
|
|
present. The kernel handles those #BR exceptions for not-present tables
|
|
by carving the space out of the normal processes address space and then
|
|
pointing the bounds-directory over to it.
|
|
|
|
The tables need to be accessed and controlled by userspace because
|
|
the instructions for moving bounds in and out of them are extremely
|
|
frequent. They potentially happen every time a register points to
|
|
memory. Any direct kernel involvement (like a syscall) to access the
|
|
tables would obviously destroy performance.
|
|
|
|
Why not do this in userspace? MPX does not strictly require anything in
|
|
the kernel. It can theoretically be done completely from userspace. Here
|
|
are a few ways this could be done. We don't think any of them are practical
|
|
in the real-world, but here they are.
|
|
|
|
:Q: Can virtual space simply be reserved for the bounds tables so that we
|
|
never have to allocate them?
|
|
:A: MPX-enabled application will possibly create a lot of bounds tables in
|
|
process address space to save bounds information. These tables can take
|
|
up huge swaths of memory (as much as 80% of the memory on the system)
|
|
even if we clean them up aggressively. In the worst-case scenario, the
|
|
tables can be 4x the size of the data structure being tracked. IOW, a
|
|
1-page structure can require 4 bounds-table pages. An X-GB virtual
|
|
area needs 4*X GB of virtual space, plus 2GB for the bounds directory.
|
|
If we were to preallocate them for the 128TB of user virtual address
|
|
space, we would need to reserve 512TB+2GB, which is larger than the
|
|
entire virtual address space today. This means they can not be reserved
|
|
ahead of time. Also, a single process's pre-populated bounds directory
|
|
consumes 2GB of virtual *AND* physical memory. IOW, it's completely
|
|
infeasible to prepopulate bounds directories.
|
|
|
|
:Q: Can we preallocate bounds table space at the same time memory is
|
|
allocated which might contain pointers that might eventually need
|
|
bounds tables?
|
|
:A: This would work if we could hook the site of each and every memory
|
|
allocation syscall. This can be done for small, constrained applications.
|
|
But, it isn't practical at a larger scale since a given app has no
|
|
way of controlling how all the parts of the app might allocate memory
|
|
(think libraries). The kernel is really the only place to intercept
|
|
these calls.
|
|
|
|
:Q: Could a bounds fault be handed to userspace and the tables allocated
|
|
there in a signal handler instead of in the kernel?
|
|
:A: mmap() is not on the list of safe async handler functions and even
|
|
if mmap() would work it still requires locking or nasty tricks to
|
|
keep track of the allocation state there.
|
|
|
|
Having ruled out all of the userspace-only approaches for managing
|
|
bounds tables that we could think of, we create them on demand in
|
|
the kernel.
|
|
|
|
Decoding MPX instructions
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
If a #BR is generated due to a bounds violation caused by MPX.
|
|
We need to decode MPX instructions to get violation address and
|
|
set this address into extended struct siginfo.
|
|
|
|
The _sigfault field of struct siginfo is extended as follow::
|
|
|
|
87 /* SIGILL, SIGFPE, SIGSEGV, SIGBUS */
|
|
88 struct {
|
|
89 void __user *_addr; /* faulting insn/memory ref. */
|
|
90 #ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO
|
|
91 int _trapno; /* TRAP # which caused the signal */
|
|
92 #endif
|
|
93 short _addr_lsb; /* LSB of the reported address */
|
|
94 struct {
|
|
95 void __user *_lower;
|
|
96 void __user *_upper;
|
|
97 } _addr_bnd;
|
|
98 } _sigfault;
|
|
|
|
The '_addr' field refers to violation address, and new '_addr_and'
|
|
field refers to the upper/lower bounds when a #BR is caused.
|
|
|
|
Glibc will be also updated to support this new siginfo. So user
|
|
can get violation address and bounds when bounds violations occur.
|
|
|
|
Cleanup unused bounds tables
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
When a BNDSTX instruction attempts to save bounds to a bounds directory
|
|
entry marked as invalid, a #BR is generated. This is an indication that
|
|
no bounds table exists for this entry. In this case the fault handler
|
|
will allocate a new bounds table on demand.
|
|
|
|
Since the kernel allocated those tables on-demand without userspace
|
|
knowledge, it is also responsible for freeing them when the associated
|
|
mappings go away.
|
|
|
|
Here, the solution for this issue is to hook do_munmap() to check
|
|
whether one process is MPX enabled. If yes, those bounds tables covered
|
|
in the virtual address region which is being unmapped will be freed also.
|
|
|
|
Adding new prctl commands
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
Two new prctl commands are added to enable and disable MPX bounds tables
|
|
management in kernel.
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
155 #define PR_MPX_ENABLE_MANAGEMENT 43
|
|
156 #define PR_MPX_DISABLE_MANAGEMENT 44
|
|
|
|
Runtime library in userspace is responsible for allocation of bounds
|
|
directory. So kernel have to use XSAVE instruction to get the base
|
|
of bounds directory from BNDCFG register.
|
|
|
|
But XSAVE is expected to be very expensive. In order to do performance
|
|
optimization, we have to get the base of bounds directory and save it
|
|
into struct mm_struct to be used in future during PR_MPX_ENABLE_MANAGEMENT
|
|
command execution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special rules
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
1) If userspace is requesting help from the kernel to do the management
|
|
of bounds tables, it may not create or modify entries in the bounds directory.
|
|
|
|
Certainly users can allocate bounds tables and forcibly point the bounds
|
|
directory at them through XSAVE instruction, and then set valid bit
|
|
of bounds entry to have this entry valid. But, the kernel will decline
|
|
to assist in managing these tables.
|
|
|
|
2) Userspace may not take multiple bounds directory entries and point
|
|
them at the same bounds table.
|
|
|
|
This is allowed architecturally. See more information "Intel(R) Architecture
|
|
Instruction Set Extensions Programming Reference" (9.3.4).
|
|
|
|
However, if users did this, the kernel might be fooled in to unmapping an
|
|
in-use bounds table since it does not recognize sharing.
|