Le jeudi 16 juin 2011 à 23:38 -0400, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:50:46 +0100
>
> > On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 04:15 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >> @@ -1594,6 +1594,7 @@ int tcp_v4_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >> goto discard;
> >>
> >> if (nsk != sk) {
> >> + sock_rps_save_rxhash(nsk, skb->rxhash);
> >> if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) {
> >> rsk = nsk;
> >> goto reset;
> >>
> >
> > I haven't tried this, but it looks reasonable to me.
> >
> > What about IPv6? The logic in tcp_v6_do_rcv() looks very similar.
>
> Indeed ipv6 side needs the same fix.
>
> Eric please add that part and resubmit. And in fact I might stick
> this into net-2.6 instead of net-next-2.6
>
OK, here is the net-2.6 based one then, thanks !
[PATCH v2] net: rfs: enable RFS before first data packet is received
First packet received on a passive tcp flow is not correctly RFS
steered.
One sock_rps_record_flow() call is missing in inet_accept()
But before that, we also must record rxhash when child socket is setup.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
CC: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
CC: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@conan.davemloft.net>
1eddceadb0