Revert "Revert "Allow libz to have stub even though it's not an ..."
Revert submission 1313718-revert-1312595-zlib_as_stub-BVNRLZPNBJ Reason for revert: relanding Reverted Changes: I0cf486d9b:Revert "libz provides stubs to Mainline modules." I412132f8a:Revert "libz is a stub" I617eb90a3:Revert "Allow libz to have stub even though it's n... Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: this is a clean relanding. Test: m Change-Id: Ib09a615bd11cf2647dcad42108adfcfc5040940f
This commit is contained in:
parent
5b79950e99
commit
2478e4e98f
|
@ -309,7 +309,13 @@ func processVndkLibrary(mctx android.BottomUpMutatorContext, m *Module) {
|
|||
panic(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if m.HasStubsVariants() {
|
||||
if m.HasStubsVariants() && name != "libz" {
|
||||
// b/155456180 libz is the ONLY exception here. We don't want to make
|
||||
// libz an LLNDK library because we in general can't guarantee that
|
||||
// libz will behave consistently especially about the compression.
|
||||
// i.e. the compressed output might be different across releases.
|
||||
// As the library is an external one, it's risky to keep the compatibility
|
||||
// promise if it becomes an LLNDK.
|
||||
mctx.PropertyErrorf("vndk.enabled", "This library provides stubs. Shouldn't be VNDK. Consider making it as LLNDK")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue