Modules in a package is implicitly visible within the same package.
When making effective visibility rules which work from another location
that visibility needs to be mentioned explicitly. In practice this
allows prebuilts to remain visible to other modules in the source
package when the prebuilts are preferred.
Test: m nothing
Test: m conscrypt-module-sdk, check that the snapshot Soong modules give
visibility to //external/conscrypt
Bug: 151303681
Change-Id: I404f6e5ca7021974a8c7be5e4d6b4982c050b8a5
For java.AndroidApp app, app.MinSdkVersion() was selected from
ApexBundleDepsInfo, not from java.Module.
This caused app.MinSdkVersion() to return "" always.
Besides, having two embeded fields and relying on depth to choose one of
them makes it hard to read.
Bug: 156537348
Test: m
Change-Id: Ib525b2f5132c596db8e33492d0a565ea23e91d1c
Vendor JNI libraries already have stable APIs enforced by the VNDK,
they shouldn't use SDK variants.
Bug: 156225490
Test: TestJNISDK
Change-Id: I21ba67e8e9fb05016caf5888129adc1a939545c2
Visibility rules can be 'inherited' in one of two ways. Either from
defaults or from a module that called ctx.CreateModule(...).
Previously, in both cases the inheriting module could only append
additional visibility rules to the end of the inherited rules. That
made it impossible to restrict the visibility by removing or ignore
inherited rules.
The //visibility:override rectifies that by allowing the inheriting
module to ignore all the rules that they would have inherited. It can
only go at the beginning of a list of rules specified in a module but
after defaults are applied it can end up in the middle of a list of
rules. In that case it behaves as if all the rules up to and including
the //visibility:override rule were discarded.
It can be used with //visibility:private to override
//visibility:public and vice versa.
Bug: 155787200
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I8a9c9c5a1bdceaee387c08864ae2b34629e0d46f
Adds a filter mechanism that can exclude property values from being
included in the common value extraction. That is needed to prevent the
snapshot mechanism from generating invalid output for properties that
are ignored on host (and have their values cleared) and which are not
tagged with `android:"arch_variant"`.
Changes:
* Updates the documentation of SdkMemberType to explain what effect
the 'ignored-on-host' tag has.
* Adds some tests for this new mechanism.
Bug: 155628860
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ibafdb6e921ba5abe505bd8a91ca5a1d9c9b5d0cb
Previously, the snapshot code did not know whether a specific property
could be arch specific or not and assumed that they all were which
meant that it could generate snapshots containing arch specific values
for properties that are not arch specific and so would fail when
unpacked.
This change requires arch specific fields in SdkMemberProperties to be
tagged as such using `android:"arch_variant"` (just as in module input
property structures). Any property without that must have properties
that are common across all variants.
Bug: 155628860
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I3df60f0b53ba02ec2c55a80c7da058eac5909d26
* changes:
Revert "Detect invalid arch specific properties in snapshot"
Revert "Adds support for 'ignored-on-host'"
Revert "Fix snapshot of a host/device cc_library with stubs"
Revert submission 1302576
Bug: 156054601
Reason for revert: Presumed root cause of build break.
Reverted Changes:
Ifc8116e11:Detect invalid arch specific properties in snapsho...
I7ebd33307:Adds support for 'ignored-on-host'
I167b47a13:Fix snapshot of a host/device cc_library with stub...
Change-Id: Id7eba0bdde5c579e10e9b42d94a7cfab5f34995f
Revert submission 1302576
Bug: 156054601
Reason for revert: Presumed root cause of build break.
Reverted Changes:
Ifc8116e11:Detect invalid arch specific properties in snapsho...
I7ebd33307:Adds support for 'ignored-on-host'
I167b47a13:Fix snapshot of a host/device cc_library with stub...
Change-Id: I2a7ac0ef0232177eefc26542c11dc675d6f4cab2
Adds a filter mechanism that can exclude property values from being
included in the common value extraction. That is needed to prevent the
snapshot mechanism from generating invalid output for properties that
are ignored on host (and have their values cleared) and which are not
tagged with `android:"arch_variant"`.
Changes:
* Updates the documentation of SdkMemberType to explain what effect
the 'ignored-on-host' tag has.
* Adds some tests for this new mechanism.
Bug: 155628860
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I7ebd333079619dba546bc8c4911d567e0287b676
Previously, the snapshot code did not know whether a specific property
could be arch specific or not and assumed that they all were which
meant that it could generate snapshots containing arch specific values
for properties that are not arch specific and so would fail when
unpacked.
This change requires arch specific fields in SdkMemberProperties to be
tagged as such using `android:"arch_variant"` (just as in module input
property structures). Any property without that must have properties
that are common across all variants.
Bug: 155628860
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ifc8116e11d987cfe7aec2eeaa964f3bbf36b5dc2
The method is a thin wrapper around GetWalkPath and GetTagPath to make
it easy to construct a string representation of the current path.
It was originally inlined in the apex package. This change makes it a
function and moves it to the android package so make it more useful.
Bug: N/A
Test: m
Change-Id: I7e2bc2074baed759d67d9097151c9ac10e34ed31
Previously, the only way for a module type to create modules (other
than defining its own mutator) was to register a LoadHook. However,
that is called before defaults are applied so any properties used in
that hook cannot take advantage of defaults, e.g. java_sdk_library
cannot use defaults to set its sdk_version property and have that
affect its child modules.
This change adds a new SetDefaultableHook() to DefaultableModule to
register a hook that is called after any defaults have been applied.
Also adds some tests to ensure that errors in the visibility property
introduced in a DefaultableHook are reported in the gather phase of
visibility processing.
A follow up change will switch java_sdk_library to use that instead
of the AddLoadHook() mechanism.
Bug: 155295806
Test: m checkapi
Change-Id: I13df3115f9e225f7324b6725eaeb16a78cc2538a
A follow up change will add a mechanism for a module to register a hook
that is called after any defaults have been applied. That is intended
for use by modules like java_sdk_library that create child modules that
are dependent upon properties that could be supplied by defaults.
Creating those child modules after prebuilts mutators are run will
cause problems if those child modules clash with prebuilts modules.
Moving the prebuilts mutators after the defaults mutators will fix
that.
Tests are currently being run with the mutators in different orders so
this change also cleans that up so they are consistent with the actual
code that is being run.
Bug: 155295806
Test: m checkbuild
Change-Id: I825c6df09058fb3a45db196661959eb332aca2f3
This was not previously possible due to LoadHooks being run after the
module was registered.
Bug: 155462403
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ia8383b9d1272bb12c8a83948753a0e4b0d98a650
This adds gcov coverage support for Rust device library and binary
modules (including test modules). Support is provided to pass Rust
static library gcno files to CC modules and visa versa.
Additional changes:
* Begin mutator added for Rust modules.
* SuffixInList added to android package.
* CoverageEnabled added to Coverage interface.
* CoverageFiles added to LinkableLibrary interface.
* Fix in coverage mutator for non-CC modules which marked the wrong
variant as the coverage variant.
* Added coverage libraries to the cc.GatherRequiredDepsForTest.
Bug: 146448203
Test: NATIVE_COVERAGE=true COVERAGE_PATHS='*' m -j <rust_module>
Change-Id: If20728bdde42a1dd544a35a40f0d981b80a5835f
Compared to full list, flat list drops dependency edges and simply
lists all transitive dependencies for a top-level apex bundle.
Bug: 149622332
Test: m, manually build flatlist
Change-Id: Ibd521c96b7aeab90b95965c1b524e0a0152aaf5a
Move depsInfo into android for easier sharing with APK code.
Bug: 149622332
Test: m, diff'ing outputs for conscrypt module.
Change-Id: If0ee967d37425540e69b4ce9304229d9f2cd86bd
Previously, errors that were found when splitting visibility rules were
only reported in the check phase and simply ignored during the gather
phase. That was because every visibility property that was processed in
the gather phase had already been checked in the check phase. However,
that is not strictly true as it has always been possible to add a
mutator between the check and gather phases that creates a module with
invalid visibility properties that will just be ignored. Fortunately,
that has not happened.
A follow up commit will add the capability to create modules after the
defaults have been applied which means the chances of invalid visibility
properties being ignored will increase.
This change makes both phases report any errors they find. It will not
have any impact on existing code as if any errors are reported in the
check phase then the build will exit before the gather phase. It will
prevent any invalid visibility errors from being ignored.
Bug: 155295806
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I101fa6b03d2530b16e4394a9e466fead48be0ff0
Adds a couple of new methods to manage visibility property instances to
reduce duplication and encapsulate the implementation slightly better.
The AddVisibilityProperty method is exported as it will be needed by
other packages in follow up commits.
Bug: 155295806
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ic1a9bb1e151fc6ae65761344fd210b4e4ba74fbc
The first component is the apex name, or a special name "platform"
if the boot jar is a platform jar rather than a part of some apex.
This is a prerequisite change for moving core-icu4j to a separate
com.android.i18n apex.
Old one-column format is still supported, but all unqualified
components of PRODUCT_BOOT_JARS get "platform:" prepended to them
after reading the product makefiles.
Test: aosp_walleye-userdebug boots
Bug: 138994281
Change-Id: Ic229159fdcdaf6182210a53b63850a389dd786fc
This change adds 'test_for' property to cc_test_* types. The property is
used to mark a module as a test for one or more APEXes, in which case
the module has accecss to the private part of the listed APEXes. For
example, the module is linked with the actrual shared library in the
APEX instead of the stub of the shared library.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: already +2'ed by owner
Bug: 129539670
Bug: 153046163
Test: m
Change-Id: I45ed0d7a15540b0d69b2a3b8d9c4cb202adff6f2
A module is marked unavailable for platform when 1) it does not have
"//apex_available:platform" in its apex_available property, or 2)
it depends on another module that is unavailable for platform.
In that case, LOCAL_NOT_AVAILABLE_FOR_PLATFORM is set to true for the
module in the Make world. Later, that flag is used to ensure that there
is no module with the flag is installed to the device.
The reason why this isn't entirely done in Soong is because Soong
doesn't know if a module will be installed to the device or not. To
explain this, let's have an example.
cc_test { name: "mytest", static_libs: ["libfoo"]}
cc_library_static { name: "libfoo", static_libs: ["libbar"]}
cc_library { name: "libbar", apex_available: ["com.android.xxx"]}
Here, libbar is not available for platform, but is used by libfoo which
is available for platform (apex_available defaults to
"//apex_available:platform"). libfoo is again depended on by mytest
which again is available for platform. The use of libbar should be
allowed in the context of test; we don't want to make libbar available
to platform just for the dependency from test because it will allow
non-test uses of the library as well.
Soong by itself can't tell whether libfoo and libbar are used only in the
context of a test. There could be another module depending them, e.g.,
cc_library_shared { name: "mylib", static_libs: ["libfoo"] }
can exist and it might be installed to the device, in which case
we really should trigger an error.
Since Make has the knowledge of what's installed and what's not,
the check should be done there.
Bug: 153073816
Test: m
Test: remove "//apex_available:platform" from libmdnssd (it is currently
installed to /system/lib), and check that `m system_image` fails
Change-Id: Ia304cc5f41f173229e8a154e90cea4dce46dcebe
Treehugger Robot