Drop down to a single high-mem task when we've got <=16GB, as the system
probably isn't completely free RAM, ninja will be using a couple gigs,
along with whatever "normal" actions will be running concurrently. So
it's unlikely that we can handle two 6-8GB actions along with everything
else.
Also print warnings when we detect <=16GB total RAM, or when we're
running more parallel jobs than than we have GB RAM. These both notify
the user and suggest lowering the `-j` value if they run into problems.
Test: fake totalRAM to [0.5,8,16]GB, checking warning
Test: fake totalRAM to 17GB, `m -j4 nothing` has no warning
Test: `m -j187 nothing` on a 188GB system
Test: `m -j188 nothing` on a 188GB system
Change-Id: Ieb008e9f462d5f40fb65781d94cf116b1caf8446
I made a mistake and only fixed android_test_import in my previous
change, I5bbb2d2b733bbd6b868898285683ba5ff45be10b.
Bug: 154281342
Test: TreeHugger
Test: chromium-webview
Change-Id: I1575d9ef3f8596f1eb8db0867db09de08945d711
Previously, droiddoc was using SdkImplementationJars() to get a JAR to
add to the classpath in order to resolve unknown references in the
source.
Given that SdkHeaderJars() returns jars created by Turbine which are
(for compilation at least) functionally identical to the implementation
jars there is no point in using the implementation jars.
Bug: 148080325
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I2b718cc1445c04e849dcb0b1f53bba2b0bd90c95
Access to the implementation JARs is restricted to avoid code from
depending on implementation details that could change from one release
to the next which could cause compatibility issues. That is not a
problem when referenced from within the APEX that contains the
java_sdk_library.
As references from within the same APEX often need to access
implementation specific details of the java_sdk_library and doing that
from within the same APEX is safe this change all references to a
java_sdk_library made within the same APEX to use the implementation
jars instead of stub jars.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
Change-Id: If239059690de61683c2ad2d8a0ce2e47286a3637
The implementation jars are not built if api_only: true. In that case
the jar paths must not be exposed implicitly as they will be nil and
they will just be ignored.
This change ensures that stubs are returned when the implementation
jars are not built.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
Change-Id: Ic495982a5dcb2754916260e7d91d921a5da288ae
Since the metalava invocations have been merged into a single one,
and checkapi already requires the other timestamp, this has no effect.
Bug: 151160048
Test: m checkapi
Change-Id: I560058f0f4cdeaedaf247cd35119da2cf0b86ea0
Adds support to translate app prebuilt tests to android_test_import and
LOCAL_REPLACE_PREBUILT_APK_INSTALLED to preprocessed property.
Test: androidmk_test.go, bpfix_test.go
Bug: 155412211
Change-Id: I77c07c684125adf228ba91911998823a68b3a65d
apex_available/min_sdk_version are required to be available for mainline
modules(APK/APEX).
- java_import/java_library_static
- android_library/android_library_import
Bug: 156996905
Test: prebuilts/sdk/update_prebuilts.sh
Change-Id: I201ebabaa533c5ee19e394ab30ca2fa0e3d7ce0e
The expression !sdkVersion.specified() is equivalent to the following:
!sdkVersion.valid() || sdkVersion.kind == sdkPrivate
That means that the else if clause "sdkVersion.kind == sdkPrivate" will
never be reached so it was removed.
There is also no need to check sdkVersion.valid() as that will already
have been checked, and an error reported, before this code has been
called. Therefore that has been removed.
Bug: 148080325
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ib7c544b48dfb53bad3e15f9f73f71bd05cff9b49
If set to true, preprocessed indicates that the prebuilt apk is
installable as is and does not need any further processing (e.g.
zipaligning, signing).
Test: app_test.go
Bug: 155412211
Change-Id: If0c27c1e340c1bdb270064f636dc6bf33a0fc949
ART tests need to explicitly control the compression.
Bug: 157239179
Test: "atest ArtGtestsTarget" with http://go/aog/1302773
Change-Id: I4490aa0a61fa71f830feb6a46dffd8d20fccfc66
Merged-In: I4490aa0a61fa71f830feb6a46dffd8d20fccfc66
The android_library module type can be used within an android_app that
can itself be added to an apex but android_library does not call
android.InitApexModule(module) and so it does not support apex variants
and so is treated as if it cannot be part of an APEX even though it
actually is.
Now, android_library supports AEPX variants.
Due to this change, the whilelist for apex_available got bigger.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Bug: 156978407
Test: m
Merged-In: I3a21d653fe9c4159e3a89791fe1a8597865eeae6
Change-Id: I3a21d653fe9c4159e3a89791fe1a8597865eeae6
(cherry picked from commit bd133b1bdc)
Previously, all java_sdk_library instances were assumed to be usable as
shared libraries, i.e. referenced from <uses-library> in Android
manifest. However, that was not true for any instances that specified
api_only: true and will not be true for many of the new Android
modules.
One consequence of this assumption is that use of one of the api_only
instances could (but fortunately does not appear to) have lead to an
invalid library being referenced in an app's manifest which would
prevent the app from loading. That would have been done automatically
by the implicit sdk library tracking and manifest fixing mechanism and
there would have been nothing a developer could have done about it.
Changes:
1) Prevents api_only instances from participating in the automatic
tracking which will prevent them from being added to Android
manifests and breaking apps.
2) Add a new shared_library property that can have the same effect as
api_only while still creating a runtime implementation library.
3) Renamed commonProperties to commonSdkLibraryProperties to
disambiguate it from the ModuleBase.commonProperties field.
4) Extracts requiresRuntimeImplementationLibrary() to remove duplicate
code accessing the Api_only property.
5) Tests for the api_only and shared_library behaviours.
Test: m nothing - added tests, tests broke, fixed code, tests passed.
Bug: 156723295
Change-Id: Iccf509e808d5ff53522188541a4c54d8f9ada93c
The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are
referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that
includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate
<uses-library> entry in their manifest.
Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that:
1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module
itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs
module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it
possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be
available at runtime.
2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library
was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow
java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should
be treated as an Android shared library.
3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances
which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set
api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the
actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change.
Changes:
* Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into
java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides
the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an
SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any
references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to
the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked.
* Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented
SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the
OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the
sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return
nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked.
* Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is
a better place for it to be.
* Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize
the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating
module.
* Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the
java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be
tracked too.
* Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both
java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly.
Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock
being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken
anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest.
m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the
code.
Bug: 156723295
Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
The test was written with the assumption that the build OS is
Linux, which is not always the case (the test was broken on Darwin).
Test: m nothing (on Linux host)
Bug: 157192627
Change-Id: I6ae3deed7a3342f4526528f29ce0a299d24b464b
Treehugger Robot