A previous change handles dist properties automatically for all module
types and as a result has made the apexBundle setting of DistFiles
redundant so this change removes that.
Test: m nothing
m dist sdk - before and after this change, compare result to
make sure that there are no significant differences.
Test the effect on the apex by following instructions in
http://b/172951145
Bug: 174226317
Change-Id: If6f741b5b73b3335f4c478a6528f5f311cd633e4
Mostly documentation changes, but includes a few refactorings like
changing the variable names, reording functions, reordering statements
in logical order, etc.
Bug: 173472337
Test: m
Change-Id: Ie1799c0972d63da823ad375f008018de782529d1
A host target is considered as being cross-compiled when the target
can't run natively on the build machine. For example, linux_glibc/x86_64
is a non-cross target on a standard x86/Linux machine, but is a cross
host on Mac. Previously, whether cross or not was a static attribute of
an OsType. For example, Windows was always considered as cross host,
while linux_bionic was not. This becomes a problem when we support more
host targets like linux_bionic/arm64 which should be cross-host on
standard x86/Linux machines.
This change removes HostCross from the OsClass type and instead adds a
property HostCross to the Target type. When a target is being added, it
is initialized to true when the target can't run natively on the current
build machine.
Bug: 168086242
Test: m
Change-Id: Ic37c8db918873ddf324c86b12b5412952b0f2be2
Flattened APEXes are installed in /<partition>/apex/<name>, so its
file_contexts file should be amended accordingly.
For example, file_contexts of an apex "com.android.foo" with should be
modified by prepending actual install path to the path regex.
/bin/foo <sepolicy label>
=> /system/apex/com\.android\.foo/bin/foo <sepolicy label>
File_contexts file is emitted to "make" via LOCAL_FILE_CONTEXTS variable
for apex_manifest.pb module.
Make collects these files and use them to build file_contexts.bin.
Also removed global state which is used to keep the list of all
flattened apexes.
Bug: 166518492
Test: m file_contexts.bin
check intermediate file_contexts.modules.tmp file
in $OUT/obj/ETC/file_contexts.bin_intermediates/
Change-Id: I780370b6e576964a5c09f9477f3361f341dd576b
For "non-updatable" devices, apex_manifest.pb is a module representing
the apex, so we need to pass common properties like init_rc and
vintf_fragments to the Make module of apex_manifest.pb so that those
files are copied when the apex is installed as flattened.
Bug: 159211312
Bug: 167383491
Test: lunch aosp_sunfish-userdebug
OVERRIDE_TARGET_FLATTEN_APEX=true m com.android.vibrator.sunfish
check $OUT/vendor/etc for init_rc/vintf_fragmemts
Change-Id: I5d5ce5acb9b837da2fb4e6ee8f3813707c6c3bd4
Multiple GKI APEXes may write to the same path
under $OUT/apex. Prevent it.
Fixes: 162366062
Test: build GKI APEX
Change-Id: I1b19870b10d6da2a85c3f7b9d93408d3a0fe90bc
Update android_app_set to use word install rather than master for
android_app_sets, this better matches the phrasing used for apex_set.
See https://source.android.com/setup/contribute/respectful-code for
reference
Bug: 161896447
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I429e7f8b16c42c10ad4d9543110f5ce814a893b1
This change fixes this error:
```
TARGET module com.android.adbd.flattened requires non-existent TARGET
module: prebuilt_libclang_rt.ubsan_standalone-arm-android
```
apexFile.moduleName is used as Make dependency name, so it should use
m.BaseModuleName() instead of m.Name(), because soong may prepend
"prebuilt_" to or mutate the output of m.Name() in other ways.
android/androidmk.go emits Android.mk modules with
`LOCAL_MODULE := module.BaseModuleName() + <SubName>`, so replace
apexFile.moduleName with BaseModuleName() + <SubName> as much as
possible.
Bug: 7456955
Test: Add unit test in apex/apex_test.go
Test: lunch blueline_hwasan && SANITIZE_TARGET='hwaddress fuzzer' m nothing
Test: Verify out/soong/Android-blueline_hwasan.mk
Change-Id: If8537fc1bedbe6c3405de3662a5df210a073c43f
Pass a list of unstripped JNI libraries to Make so that they can be
installed into the symbols directory.
Bug: 159726429
Test: forrest
Change-Id: Ieb4bffbb3d0a09f476da011399c5b8b1611929d7
AndroidMkEntries handles bunch of common properties(e.g. LOCAL_INIT_RC,
LOCAL_VINTF_FRAGMENTS, etc).
However apex defines its own Custom() writer, so those properties should
be handled manually.
For example, when an apex defines "init_rc" properties, the value should
be passed to Make via LOCAL_INIT_RC.
Bug: 159211312
Test: m
Change-Id: I65e7a456486c9f5fe70c91b78ff181425035fcf2
Previously, when a boot jar was provided by a java_sdk_library_import
module the check-boot-jars check failed because the file it depended on
was not available. In an incremental build the build failed due to the
file in the out directory not having a rule to generate it.
That was because the module was named prebuilt_<module>.<apex> instead
of <module>.<apex>. This was fixed by simply removing prebuilt_ prefix
from the name if it was present.
After fixing that the check-boot-jars still did not work properly
because it was expecting a jar file containing .class files but instead
was given a jar file containing .dex files which meant the check did
not work properly.
This was fixed by defining a new ApexDependency interface for use by
the apex/apex.go code to use instead of java.Dependency for generating
the androidmk entries. The *SdkLibraryImport type then implemented
those, by delegating to the implementation library.
Bug: 158304459
Bug: 159112414
Test: m check-boot-jars
m checkbuild
manual inspection of the .jar file used by check-boot-jars to
ensure it contained .class files and not .dex files.
Change-Id: I545c5c9072dd472337d2f9b4dfdf08f53c981662
Merged-In: I545c5c9072dd472337d2f9b4dfdf08f53c981662
Previously, when a boot jar was provided by a java_sdk_library_import
module the check-boot-jars check failed because the file it depended on
was not available. In an incremental build the build failed due to the
file in the out directory not having a rule to generate it.
That was because the module was named prebuilt_<module>.<apex> instead
of <module>.<apex>. This was fixed by simply removing prebuilt_ prefix
from the name if it was present.
After fixing that the check-boot-jars still did not work properly
because it was expecting a jar file containing .class files but instead
was given a jar file containing .dex files which meant the check did
not work properly.
This was fixed by defining a new ApexDependency interface for use by
the apex/apex.go code to use instead of java.Dependency for generating
the androidmk entries. The *SdkLibraryImport type then implemented
those, by delegating to the implementation library.
Bug: 158304459
Bug: 159112414
Test: m check-boot-jars
m checkbuild
manual inspection of the .jar file used by check-boot-jars to
ensure it contained .class files and not .dex files.
Change-Id: I545c5c9072dd472337d2f9b4dfdf08f53c981662
Don't emit an empty LOCAL_OVERRIDES_MODULES line if APEX is not
overriding any module.
Test: TH noop
Change-Id: I7abbaccd54bf2ffa25a6c798260c81284ea5ecb2
Ida6f7bb784efe74cc1fa0e8d370eaee803f08b0f made it possible to add
dex_import modules into apex, but that change had a bug. When creating
Android.mk for the dex_import module, the code executed an unchecked
type assertion to convert java.DexImport to java.Dependency, which
cannot be successful. This change fixes the bug by doing a checked type
assertion instead.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from AOSP
Bug: 157886942
Test: m (test added)
Merged-In: Id22c20d42effce539fab10b0d349bf340d467f02
(cherry picked from commit 9e83f0b531)
Change-Id: Id22c20d42effce539fab10b0d349bf340d467f02
Ida6f7bb784efe74cc1fa0e8d370eaee803f08b0f made it possible to add
dex_import modules into apex, but that change had a bug. When creating
Android.mk for the dex_import module, the code executed an unchecked
type assertion to convert java.DexImport to java.Dependency, which
cannot be successful. This change fixes the bug by doing a checked type
assertion instead.
Bug: 157886942
Test: m (test added)
Change-Id: Id22c20d42effce539fab10b0d349bf340d467f02
Previously, if a data source was included in multiple APEX, it would
appear multiple times; however, this caused errors for overriding
commands for targets
Test: apex_test.go
Test: m nothing with change I54d92eca88fc04c949209d490e838d0a92ce8f87
Bug: 155820504
Change-Id: I98f04e0fd9fa3238f2bb0e5da3a86fc0797c38ba
Incorrectly used fmt.Println, printing to stdout instead of the desired
file.
Test: m com.android.art.testing
Bug: 155820504
Change-Id: I1aaf15de4f18f71710bc344bc8f71723e9756ad4
Passes an additional android.Module parameter through to avoid having
to use javaLibrary interface.
Bug: 146586360
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Ie533c16c753dc9c43171d0223953adea7b2b5ee6
Change-Id: Ie533c16c753dc9c43171d0223953adea7b2b5ee6
(cherry picked from commit 581bbbe8cb)
Passes an additional android.Module parameter through to avoid having
to use javaLibrary interface.
Bug: 146586360
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ie533c16c753dc9c43171d0223953adea7b2b5ee6
This is a cherry-pick change.
Test: Built mainline module coverage data
Bug: 152117890
Change-Id: I47bf3e5d6e78c4518729bdb52616e248156d3cec
Merged-In: I47bf3e5d6e78c4518729bdb52616e248156d3cec
Using $(call dist-for-goals,droidcore,...) for every apex
installed-files.txt causes every apex to be built for all builds,
causing a signficiant regression in build time. For now only
dist them in checkbuilds, which were going to build all of them
anyways.
Ideally we would like to dist the installed-files.txt only if
the apex was already built, but there is not currently a way to
express that.
Test: treehugger
Bug: 149979076
Change-Id: I21edbc90980f94ad6d497cb86ee80223dd782fe1
Merged-In: I21edbc90980f94ad6d497cb86ee80223dd782fe1
(cherry picked from commit 1c85e8e019)
Using $(call dist-for-goals,droidcore,...) for every apex
installed-files.txt causes every apex to be built for all builds,
causing a signficiant regression in build time. For now only
dist them in checkbuilds, which were going to build all of them
anyways.
Ideally we would like to dist the installed-files.txt only if
the apex was already built, but there is not currently a way to
express that.
Test: treehugger
Bug: 149979076
Change-Id: I21edbc90980f94ad6d497cb86ee80223dd782fe1
As a second step to removing the go/android3p instructions to copy or
to link NOTICE to LICENSE, include LICENSE files in the notices, which
will allow deleting all of the copied/linked NOTICE files.
The change causes a few additions to the system image notice files.
Test: manually built and compared before and after notices
Change-Id: Ia7bc58e2eba7bed5e63934881b5298201a93bc3e
When a module is not available for platform (i.e.
//apex_available:platform is missing in the apex_available property), m
<module_name> previously just didn't work because there is no platform
variant of the module.
This change fixes the behavior; regardless of whether the platform
variant is available or not, m <module_name> builds all the apex
variants of the module along with the platform variant if it exists.
Bug: 147728094
Test: m conscrypt
Change-Id: Iedd3fa6fc0ed779c5f7c5d65f23d86f799ac0cbe
apex {
name: "myapex",
native_shared_libs: ["libfoo"],
apex_name: "apex_name",
}
override_apex {
name: "myapex.override",
base: "myapex"
}
Previsouly, above wasn't supported because both APEXes have the same
apex_name and that apex_name is used as the suffix of libfoo. i.e.,
there are two libfoo.apex_name modules defined.
Now, the two apex variants of libfoo are named as
libfoo.myapex and libfoo.myapex.override.
Bug: 140136207
Test: m
Change-Id: I63f8a1de463011c6e0b97f5f6eee83103e22bc30
Leaving out LOCAL_CERTIFICATE for flattened apex APKs causes
the apkcerts.txt to have empty keys for those APKs, which
confuses the signing tools. Set LOCAL_CERTIFICATE for them.
Also refactor the Certificate support to avoid introducing
duplicated handling for presigned certificates.
Bug: 147765187
Test: m apkcerts-list
Change-Id: Ife07661761cd5a89c9f009b8ce041db4dff9ec54
Paul Duffin