The android_library module type can be used within an android_app that
can itself be added to an apex but android_library does not call
android.InitApexModule(module) and so it does not support apex variants
and so is treated as if it cannot be part of an APEX even though it
actually is.
Now, android_library supports AEPX variants.
Due to this change, the whilelist for apex_available got bigger.
Bug: 156978407
Test: m
Merged-In: I3a21d653fe9c4159e3a89791fe1a8597865eeae6
Change-Id: I3a21d653fe9c4159e3a89791fe1a8597865eeae6
The marked library(ies) were available to the APEX via the
hand-written whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the
whitelist by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the
libraries.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I827d604c7e5a469a8b8a6d5a4b7917f2eaca48ca
Change-Id: I827d604c7e5a469a8b8a6d5a4b7917f2eaca48ca
apex_set takes an .apks file that contains a set of prebuilt apexes with
different configurations. It uses extract_apks to select and install the
best matching one for the current target.
Bug: 153456259
Test: apex_test.go
Test: com.android.media.apks
Change-Id: I1da8bbcf1611b7c580a0cb225856cbd7029cc0a7
Merged-In: I1da8bbcf1611b7c580a0cb225856cbd7029cc0a7
Passes an additional android.Module parameter through to avoid having
to use javaLibrary interface.
Bug: 146586360
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Ie533c16c753dc9c43171d0223953adea7b2b5ee6
Change-Id: Ie533c16c753dc9c43171d0223953adea7b2b5ee6
(cherry picked from commit 581bbbe8cb)
networkstack-aidl-interfaces-*java has explicit apex_available now.
Accordingly, remove it from the whitelist
Bug: 133526962
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: If5427afb2470a7dffbd418e1c405af508577ad93
Move depsInfo into android for easier sharing with APK code.
Bug: 149622332
Test: m, diff'ing outputs for conscrypt module.
Change-Id: If0ee967d37425540e69b4ce9304229d9f2cd86bd
Merged-In: If0ee967d37425540e69b4ce9304229d9f2cd86bd
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
(cherry picked from commit 872a144dca)
The marked library(ies) were available to the APEXes via the
hand-written whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the
whitelist by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the
libraries.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I11a4e877ee27f7c55e2f00371c6fa58daedb1a9f
(cherry picked from commit 601d31c234)
Change-Id: I11a4e877ee27f7c55e2f00371c6fa58daedb1a9f
A module is marked unavailable for platform when 1) it does not have
"//apex_available:platform" in its apex_available property, or 2)
it depends on another module that is unavailable for platform.
In that case, LOCAL_NOT_AVAILABLE_FOR_PLATFORM is set to true for the
module in the Make world. Later, that flag is used to ensure that there
is no module with the flag is installed to the device.
The reason why this isn't entirely done in Soong is because Soong
doesn't know if a module will be installed to the device or not. To
explain this, let's have an example.
cc_test { name: "mytest", static_libs: ["libfoo"]}
cc_library_static { name: "libfoo", static_libs: ["libbar"]}
cc_library { name: "libbar", apex_available: ["com.android.xxx"]}
Here, libbar is not available for platform, but is used by libfoo which
is available for platform (apex_available defaults to
"//apex_available:platform"). libfoo is again depended on by mytest
which again is available for platform. The use of libbar should be
allowed in the context of test; we don't want to make libbar available
to platform just for the dependency from test because it will allow
non-test uses of the library as well.
Soong by itself can't tell whether libfoo and libbar are used only in the
context of a test. There could be another module depending them, e.g.,
cc_library_shared { name: "mylib", static_libs: ["libfoo"] }
can exist and it might be installed to the device, in which case
we really should trigger an error.
Since Make has the knowledge of what's installed and what's not,
the check should be done there.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 153073816
Test: m
Test: remove "//apex_available:platform" from libmdnssd (it is currently
installed to /system/lib), and check that `m system_image` fails
Merged-In: Ia304cc5f41f173229e8a154e90cea4dce46dcebe
(cherry picked from commit 89e850ab84)
Change-Id: Ia304cc5f41f173229e8a154e90cea4dce46dcebe
updatable APEXes should set min_sdk_version as well.
Bug: 152655956
Test: m
Merged-In: I8192086eb89fa958dd8ff1b731e43e24bf217ce2
Change-Id: I8192086eb89fa958dd8ff1b731e43e24bf217ce2
(cherry picked from commit 548640b55f)
libopus sets its own apex_available property.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I4cff3ebb7e017a1fb629b18b72238acf3df0d26e
Change-Id: I4cff3ebb7e017a1fb629b18b72238acf3df0d26e
(cherry picked from commit 47db5adb06)
This reverts commit e17caa63a6.
Reason for revert: rewrite this in ag/11250335 without neverallow
Bug: 152655956
Change-Id: I24436720056ac1b9878e37c2ee45c5806714f3e9
apex_deps/apex/apex_flattened mutators don't have to run if module is
disabled.
For some branches which have no valid targets, apex modules are disabled
by the os mutator. e.g. aosp-build-tools
Some enforcement checks which run during those mutators may fail because
build-environment doesn't provide full context information.
For example, "Platform_version_all_codenames" config variable is not
set while apex.min_sdk_version uses one of those codenames.
Bug: 152655956
Test: m
Merged-In: I47e27d2d025ba4c36534708b113ce77c4cb2397b
Change-Id: I47e27d2d025ba4c36534708b113ce77c4cb2397b
(cherry picked from commit 49f6701e9a)
It is no longer needed because non-static java_library dependencies are
not considered to be part of the depending APEX.
Bug: 153443117
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: I7d58d1047b2d400395a253e492b35008284778ff
Change-Id: I7d58d1047b2d400395a253e492b35008284778ff
When a source and a prebuilt module are present in the same build a
dependency is added from the source module to the prebuilt module.
Previously, the code for generating the APEX did not recognize that
tag and in some cases (e.g. for cc_(prebuilt_)library_shared) will
fail the build.
This change:
1) Adds a test to reproduce the problem.
2) Improves the debug message by pretty printing the tag.
3) Adds a new ExcludeFromApexContents interface that can be implemented
by a tag to declare that it should be excluded from the APEX
contents.
4) Ignores tags that implement that interface when generating APEX
contents.
5) Implements that interface on prebuiltDependencyTag to fix the
test.
Bug: 153326844
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: I9dd4312c4f995c816c0a31d8d733eb5d7f56e1ea
Change-Id: I9dd4312c4f995c816c0a31d8d733eb5d7f56e1ea
Previously, adding java_library to an sdk required that the names of
any APEXes that transitively compiled against it were added to its
apex_available property. This change removes that requirement.
Also corrects the dependency path in the TestApexAvailable_IndirectDep
error which previously passed through "shared from static" static
dependency tags even though those are explicitly NOT followed when
checking apex_available settings.
Bug: 152878661
Bug: 153306490
Test: m droid
Merged-In: I995ed38956c1bc210b09494812de012fed9f9232
Change-Id: I995ed38956c1bc210b09494812de012fed9f9232
Having dependency tags in the dependency path that shows why a specific
module is considered part of an apex makes it easier to understand why
that is the case and detect possible issues.
Bug: 152762638
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Iba2a8a5a6abe03dadee456e760aa4373cd00c07b
Change-Id: Iba2a8a5a6abe03dadee456e760aa4373cd00c07b
The DepIsInSameApex() and RequiredSdks() methods were defined in a few
places to avoid having to depend on the whole ApexModule/SdkAware
interfaces directly. However, that has a couple of issues:
1) It duplicates functionality making it difficult to change, changes
to the definitions outside the main interfaces do not cause compile
time failures, instead they result in a runtime change in behavior
which can be difficult to debug.
2) IDE navigation (specifically in Intellij) does not detect that the
duplicate definitions can resolve to the definitions in the main
interface.
This change extracts the methods into their own interfaces and reuses
those interfaces instead of duplicating the methods to fix both of
these issues.
Bug: 152878661
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: I0cfdf342a14eb0bfb82b1bd17e0633d81c7facfb
Change-Id: I0cfdf342a14eb0bfb82b1bd17e0633d81c7facfb
Delegate the responsibility for determining whether the
walkPayloadDeps() should visit a child dependency to its do function.
This is needed to allow the visitor in checkApexAvailability() to avoid
checking the apex_available setting after crossing the APEX boundary.
Bug: 152878661
Bug: 153306490
Test: m droid
Merged-In: If46a2f74b6eca670befc3aeae430650e85542346
Change-Id: If46a2f74b6eca670befc3aeae430650e85542346
The apex available check can traverse quite a long path (5+ steps) to
get from the apex to a module that is missing the apex from its
apex_available property. Understanding where that dependency came from
can often require examining the dependency path which can be difficult.
This change adds the path to the error to simplify that process.
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Bug: 152762638
Merged-In: Ic4eb169dc2026cd8339d49e23b25d6d1c3879750
Change-Id: Ic4eb169dc2026cd8339d49e23b25d6d1c3879750
Makes sure that the module snapshots do not rely on the white list
of apex available settings so that when those lists are removed it is
not necessary to update any snapshots.
Bug: 142935992
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Iedcff7dfc2646a4da77258d16e06657dd2f411f9
Change-Id: Iedcff7dfc2646a4da77258d16e06657dd2f411f9
Test apexes no longer check to see whether their contents are available
so the special handling is no longer necessary.
Bug: 142935992
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Iecae7dcbb87908d19c672f74d3c1ed8810d4485b
Change-Id: Iecae7dcbb87908d19c672f74d3c1ed8810d4485b
The whitelistedApexAvailable used to map references to
com.android.art.debug/release to com.android.art before looking it up
in the white list. This change removed that mapping and simply added
both to the white list.
Bug: 142935992
Bug: 153306490
Test: m nothing
Merged-In: Ibad76fb73988688eb303e056197986ee9a6119ae
Change-Id: Ibad76fb73988688eb303e056197986ee9a6119ae
Coverage build adds extra dependencies for the runtime libs. Marking
them and their transitive dependenciese with apex_available doesn't make
any value; it instead adds noise.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I08e51cec1de6ded624ef9d4c41c1e5b2e611ff38
(cherry picked from commit 58d1090032)
Change-Id: I08e51cec1de6ded624ef9d4c41c1e5b2e611ff38
The marked library(ies) were available to the adbd APEX via the
hand-written whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the
whitelist by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the
libraries.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I6afbe905dda11056559521b937803dcd85b32fe5
(cherry picked from commit 3a0db5ef4e)
Change-Id: I6afbe905dda11056559521b937803dcd85b32fe5
The NDK prebuilts are implicitly used when building with sdk_version set.
Make the module types be available to any apex so that we don't need to
manually add apex_available property to the module definitions manually.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I0870afa4c74b4a06ab1273dff84615778561ecc9
(cherry picked from commit e01e228270)
Change-Id: I0870afa4c74b4a06ab1273dff84615778561ecc9
The marked library(ies) were available to the APEXes via the hand-written
whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the whitelist
by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the libraries.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Merged-In: I91d1b1076733a949ca2a959ba640ce34d0233492
(cherry picked from commit 541142ce6b)
Change-Id: I91d1b1076733a949ca2a959ba640ce34d0233492
Apex can use codenames like "Q", "R" for its min_sdk_version property.
Also, cc_library can use codenames for its stubs.versions.
Bug: 152655956
Test: vendor/google/build/build_mainline_modules.sh
Change-Id: I077ad7b2ac5d90b4c8708921e43846206f05ba70
libselinux no longer is included in any APEX. Only the platform variant
of it (/system/lib/libselinux.so) exists and APEXes link to it.
Removing the lib name from the whitelist to make it clear that the
library is not available to any APEX.
Bug: 151053366
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from aosp
Merged-In: Id4fb933141ad32ff5217a58f1c7d689cc657e9ea
(cherry picked from commit 1731f6ae3f)
Change-Id: Id4fb933141ad32ff5217a58f1c7d689cc657e9ea
min_sdk_version = 29 implies that the module should support Android10.
Bug: 150431944
Test: m
Merged-In: Iad90a239898f59456900ae7816b90379b1b43406
Change-Id: Iad90a239898f59456900ae7816b90379b1b43406
(cherry picked from commit 5417f775e5)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
Native modules within APEX should be linked with proper stub version
according to its min_sdk_version.
For example, when min_sdk_version is set to "29", libfoo in the apex
would be linked to libbar of version 29 from platform, even if it has
a newer version like 30.
Bug: 145796956
Test: m nothing (soong tests)
Merged-In: I4a0b2002587bc24b7deeb5d59b6eeba5e1db5b1f
Change-Id: I4a0b2002587bc24b7deeb5d59b6eeba5e1db5b1f
(cherry picked from commit 03b5185b88)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: got ORV already.
Checking apex_available was missing some corner cases.
For example, the deps of share deps of cc_library modules are missed
while those from cc_library_shared are correctly tracked.
This was due to..
* calling DepIsInSameApex in WalkDeps: both work fine separately, but
when they are used together, it fails to work. It's due to how WalkDeps
works. (We might fix this bug too risky since it is used very widely)
* incorrect receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator: receiver
is supposed to be parent, but child was used before. Interestingly lots
of deps are within the same group of module types(cc to cc, java to
java), it has worked. (note that receiver's DepIsInSameApex
implementation can be different).
This change fixes them by..
* walkPayloadDeps is now relying on ApexVariation, which is calculated
correctly by TopDown apex_deps mutator.
* use correct receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator, which
requires for java.SdkLibrary to override the method and for
java.Library/Import to use passed dep instead of receiver to check its
membership of sdk.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from aosp/master
Bug: 151071238
Test: build/boot
Merged-In: I0569ef4bb8e79635e4d97a89f421a8d8b7d26456
(cherry picked from commit 5e9013be22)
Change-Id: I0569ef4bb8e79635e4d97a89f421a8d8b7d26456
When the check for apex_available has failed, the build system now shows
the module that brought the unavailable module into the APEX.
Bug: 151051671
Test: m
Change-Id: Id1a3fda67fe56fdc2dc90ec800d10689415de4d6
Add a min_sdk_version property apexes. Currently a noop, but will
be used to enforce that dependencies are compatible with the
specified version.
Test: m checkbuild
Bug: 149591522
Merged-In: I923773c90fe15becbffae3986791aa9edde8f8f6
Change-Id: I923773c90fe15becbffae3986791aa9edde8f8f6
(cherry picked from commit 50317874ff)
Jooyung Han